ot a problem for a few recipients though -- it's
> > really only a performance problem with many separate recipients.
>
> Thanks for this incredibly clear explanation. And Xu, thanks for asking
> the question.
>
> Cheers,
To see the two signatures you can run this command at the encrypted message:
gpg --batch --list-packets
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
their position related to
> text, either), but also hide some links if I need to click the button
> in the page.
You understand that opening complete HTML messages with images linked from
remote servers and also clicking on links without knowing where they may take
you, is potentially unsaf
ecipient can decrypt this message with their private key.
A copy of the message will also be encrypted by your own public key and saved
in the folder you have specified for Sent messages. It is this copy which you
can decrypt with your private key later on, if you wish to read what you sent
to the recipient.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
behaviour? Thank you in advance.
Have you tried commenting out the record directive altogether?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Starred
On the folder sidebar neither "[Gmail]/" nor "All Mail" are listed, but I
can't recall what I changed in the configuration to make this so.
I'm asking because it takes forever to sync with the mailserver every time I
login (I have more than 100k messages).
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
il account, downloading 5.4MB of data each time. I have in excess of 125k
messages and do not want to download all of these locally. Other smaller
IMAP4 accounts are much faster. Is this how it should be, or am I doing
something wrong?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ogle.com/
>
> ?
>
> You may need to do something in the OS layer for your preferred handler
> for URLs. "open" just taps into that.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
:
"As long as these libraries support the Simple Authentication and Security
Layer (SASL), they should be compatible with the SASL XOAUTH2 mechanism
supported by Gmail."
I suspect that "secure" mobile client apps use the Google API directly with
OAuth 2.0 Access Tokens when they authenticate with Gmail/Calendar/etc. but I
haven't looked into it any more than this.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
uot;Access for less secure apps" turned On and I have no problem (yet)
connecting to their IMAP4 server. I hope this continues to be the case.
> Perhaps someone will post telling me google are wrong and it's fine to
> turn this off. I'm open to hearing this also provided I understand
> why.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ben F
--
Regards,
Mick
Thank you Peter,
On 22-06-2015 ,20:40:58, Peter P. wrote:
> * Mick [2015-06-22 18:44]:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Any idea why when I delete messages in trash, it creates duplicate
> > messages? Is there another way to delete a single message in the trash
> >
Hi All,
Any idea why when I delete messages in trash, it creates duplicate
messages? Is there another way to delete a single message in the trash
folder, or empty the whole folder?
--
Regards,
Mick
ail, say:
> >
> > mutt -s topic receiver < foo
> > The mail is successfully sent, but no copy in my server's sent folder.
> > I check the debug log, the mail is not uploaded to imap server at all,
> > just sent through smtp server.
> >
> > I have t
problem here, compared say to Kmail or T'bird. I don't know if it is down
to caching architecture differences between various mail clients or not yet
having tried some configuration that works for mutt, so I would be interested
to see if you come across a solution.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
w for
this and it bails out. Do you still get this problem if you try to use mutt
to connect to the same without the script and manually accept the certificate?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 06 Jan 2014 12:22:49 Heiko Heil wrote:
> Hello Mick,
>
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 08:34:52PM +0000, Mick wrote:
> >> I found the description of those fields in smime.c:
> >> /* 0=email 1=name 2=nick 3=intermediate 4=trust */ (line 397)
> >> Just wonde
t;?").
Could it be that the intermediate cert was not part of the p12 file bundle?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
lear - If the server is sending both a CA and
server certificate chain then these two or more separate certificates in the
chain would be returned when you try to login to the server with openssl
s_client -showcerts. You can then separately examine their fingerprints and
compare with whatever you may have in your local certificate store using:
openssl x509 -in cert.pem -noout -fingerprint
> Thanks again and happy holidays,
> Marcus
Happy Christmas to you and all mutters! :-)
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
connect
and check what each server is sending and manually compare the fingerprint of
the Issuing Authority. For certificates already in your .mutt/certificates
store you can check the same with, e.g.:
openssl x509 -in your_cert.pem -text
or if they are in a p12 bundle use:
openssl pkcs12 -in your_cert.p12 info
Hope this helps.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 18:10:04 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Mick [12-07-13 10:41]:
> [...]
>
> > It is not mere confirmation that I want at this stage, but to see the
> > complete message (headers + body) before I send it. It is a last check
> > and occasionally
On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 15:20:13 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Mick [12-07-13 09:53]:
> > On Saturday 07 Dec 2013 11:44:06 Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 12:16:08PM +0100, Martin Vegter wrote:
> > > > When composing a new mail, after I exit the editor
t; You can hit enter on the message body to view it again. I do that rather
> often.
I do that too sometimes, which illustrates the need for it to be available as
a feature, because it is inefficient having to do it manually. Is there some
stanza that could achieve this automatically?
-
t:587"
> set smtp_pass="thepassword"
> set realname="friend"
> set from="name.surn...@alice.it"
> set envelope_from = yes
> set copy = yes
> set record = /tmp/mutt_send_report.`/bin/date +%Y.%m`
> set postponed = /tmp/mutt_postponed
> #unset confirmappend
> unset use_domain
> set hostname = alice.it
You can increase debugging by launching mutt with -d # , where "#" = 1-5.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ive it on a real disk drive.
Is there some reason why you do not archive it using the many different
archiving tools that exist on Linux (from rsync, tar, cp -a commands, to more
complicated backup applications and scripts)?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 20 Nov 2013 21:07:13 Mark Filipak wrote:
> Thanks for your reply, Mick...
>
> On 2013/11/20 2:59 PM, Mick wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 Nov 2013 07:42:34 you wrote:
> >> On 2013/11/19 1:51 AM, Mick wrote:
> >>> I don't know what p
On Wednesday 20 Nov 2013 07:42:34 you wrote:
> On 2013/11/19 1:51 AM, Mick wrote:
> > I don't know what permissions problems you are talking about...
>
> Windows kept saying "Hey! That came from an alien system. I'm not going to
> let you install it." It
MSWindows at an application
level. I would think that application level locks would manage access to it.
Better try it out first before you trust your data to it.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
e I am reading the next message. Could somebody please
> advice if this can be disabled?
I use the space bar to page down (shift+space to page up) in a message. This
is what I have in ~/.muttrc to stop it going to the next message in the
folder:
set pager_stop
HTH.
--
Regards,
Mick
sig
ner.
No it won't. It requires a two step process of gpg decrypting it, then piping
it to the application that can handle the mime type of the file; you may need
something like xdg-open to process it and call the default application for the
mime type, or perhaps .mailcap can play a role here? Someone with better
knowledge in this should come along soon to explain.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
27;ve never managed to
learn how to use emacs, but as they say it's never tool late to learn to play
the piano! :p
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
ername, but pre-fills the field with my
> current user account. How can I amend this behaviour so that it uses
> the IMAP username by default? A web search reveals the,
> "mutt_addr_is_user" variable, but a search on the wiki and in the manual
> for this term gives no results.
>
> Regards,
>
> SQ.
You may want to try setting 'record' similar to this for sent messages, unless
you want to keep a local copy:
set record = "+INBOX/sent-mail"
if you haven't already done so. With Gmail you wouldn't need to do this.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
couple of seconds.
It may be my lack of knowledge with mutt that has produced this latency, but
having spent a week tweaking my configuration I did not see any improvement.
The OP circumstances may be different.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Monday 03 Jun 2013 00:13:15 Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote:
> nevermind .. .in this server is closed the port 25 ..
It doesn't matter, you can configure some other port for smtp on the server
and then point mailx, mutt, etc. to it.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: T
On Thursday 30 May 2013 14:51:45 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 23:17:56 +0100, Mick wrote:
> > ## usern...@account1.com
> > source "~/.mutt/account1/.muttrc"
> > folder-hook $folder '~/.mutt/account1/.muttrc'
> >
>
On Thursday 30 May 2013 14:30:32 Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:44:26AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 May 2013 23:57:39 Andre Klärner wrote:
> > > On Wed 29.05.2013 15:03:27, Mick wrote:
> > > > Hmm ... this is strange, becau
On Thursday 30 May 2013 13:38:36 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Mick [05-30-13 08:21]:
> > On Thursday 30 May 2013 02:05:48 Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > /s/set/reset/
> >
> > Sorry I don't understand ...
I still don't understand what "/s/set/reset/&
they will have to be rebuilt and cause delay!
>
> /s/set/reset/
Sorry I don't understand ...
I have created a ~/.mutt/tmp/ directory now, but this makes no odds in terms
of performance.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 29 May 2013 23:57:39 Andre Klärner wrote:
> On Wed 29.05.2013 15:03:27, Mick wrote:
> > Hmm ... this is strange, because it doesn't. All it says is:
> > /home/username/.mutt/gmail/.muttrc: unknown command
>
> did you miss a "source " before th
On Wednesday 29 May 2013 08:34:17 Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:16:47AM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > Meanwhile, the "Unknown command" error every time mutt parses my
> > ~/.mutt/gmail/.muttrc remains. :-(
>
> It should show you line numbers. That
On Wednesday 29 May 2013 11:14:39 James Griffin wrote:
> Wed 29.May'13 at 8:46:48 +0200, Patrick Ben
> Koetter....
>
> > * Mick :
> > > On Tuesday 28 May 2013 23:49:48 Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > --8<--
> >
> > > to
changes to messages in between, it still takes ages to evaluate the cache.
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 28 May 2013 23:49:48 Suvayu Ali wrote:
> Hi Mick,
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:17:56PM +0100, Mick wrote:
> > set folder = "imaps://imap.gmail.com:993"
> > set spoolfile = "imaps://imap.gmail.com:993/INBOX"
> > #set record = "+I
rw by the mail group too.
What is the convention with mutt?
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
= `gpg --decrypt ~/.mutt/.gmail_passwd.gpg`
set smtp_url = "smtp://usern...@smtp.gmail.com:587/"
#set smtp_pass = `gpg --decrypt ~/.mutt/.gmail_passwd.gpg`
set from = "usern...@gmai.com"
set realname = "Mick"
set signature = ~/Mail/Signatures/gmail
set ssl_starttls =
* John P. Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011216 14:12]:
> set backup
:s/backup/nobackup/
--
-Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP info is in the X-.* mail headers
two)
mailboxes ! +mbox +foo +etc
or something along the lines of:
mailboxes `echo $HOME/Mail/* | sed 's/ [^ ]*sent//'`
Don't mean to insult you if that ^is^ too obvious, but the symptoms
match exactly.
--
-Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP info is in the X-.* mail headers
PGP signature
7;t wish to see. Any
header field whose tag begins with an "ignored"
pattern will be ignored.
The unignore command permits you to define excep
tions from the above mentioned list of ignored
headers.
--
46 matches
Mail list logo
