On 2001-12-07 (Friday) at 09:46:26 +, Paul Roberts wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:56:33PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> > Cron will mail the standard output and error to you by default.
> > Try appending the following to the end of the cron command:
> >
> > 2>&1 >/dev/null
>
>
On 2001-12-04 (Tuesday) at 21:40:40 +0100, René Clerc wrote:
> * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-12-2001 21:22]:
> | Josh Huber wrote:
> | >
> | > 1) to have qmail generate the Mail-Followup-To header automatically,
> | >you must have a list of mailing lists for it to use, so unless you
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 05:19:45PM +0200, Petri Kelottijaervi wrote:
>
> I just wanted to notify at least you guys (I'm not a member of
> mutt-dev so I don't post there) that since HTML mail is so difficult,
> I'm probably just going to write a HTML code stripper (only caring
> about and such *n
If a MIME entity (either a sub-part of a multipart message or in this
case the entire body of the message) is not of a type that Mutt can
handle internally, but it's been told to autoview it then Mutt saves
the entity to a temporary file, runs the appropriate command on this
file and shows you the
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:43:30AM +0100, mark wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:04:31PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:14:36AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote:
> > > I normally save my mail in individual files depending on the user
> > > (s
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 03:48:29PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:43:30AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote:
> > I missed that post - I've only been using mutt (and subscribed to the
> > list) for a few days, but that sounds like the kind of thing I want.
>
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 07:49:40AM +0100, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> Using staroffice is a horror idea - at least to me...:-)). What do
> you want to see in those emails? Mutt is an email client, very fast,
> staroffice is *BIGGG* and *SLW*. I can imagine myself waiting
> 30-40 sec for some stupid
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 07:04:31PM -0500, Tim Legant wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:14:36AM +0100, Mark Sheppard wrote:
> > I normally save my mail in individual files depending on the user
> > (set force_name=yes), but for mailing lists I would like to save
> > th
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:42:24PM +0300, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
> Mike Broome wrote:
> : On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:46:36PM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote:
[...]
> : > What I imagine is this: mbox_umask and attach_umask default to
> : > 077. If the user explicitly configures mbox_umask to be
> : >
I don't know if that's possible. It guess mutt would need to set some
kind of local variable to use later in that command and then discard.
I was thinking about something similar recently. I normally save my
mail in individual files depending on the user (set force_name=yes),
but for mailing lis
>
> --- umutt ---
> #!/bin/sh
>
> umask 06
> exec mutt $*
> -
>
> Sam
>
> Quoting Mark Sheppard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> > How do I set the file permissions for my saved mail? I've looked
> > through the documentation
Hi,
How do I set the file permissions for my saved mail? I've looked
through the documentation and can't find any setting for this (there's
nothing mentioning "umask", "perm" or "mode"). When mail gets saved
it creates files with 600 permissions whereas I want 660.
Thanks,
Mark Sheppard.
12 matches
Mail list logo
