Re: folder hook: delete old messages [solved]

On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 07:56:00PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote.. > On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 06:52:12PM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote: > > For the longest time I successfully used a folder hook like > > this: > > > > folder-hook =mutt-users "push '~r>5d!~F

folder hook: delete old messages

topped working, but now this folder hook does not delete anything. Any thoughts on what might be happening? Using Mutt 1.5.13 connecting to an Imap server. Thanks. -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941

folder hook: delete older than 5 days

topped working, but now this folder hook does not delete anything. Any thoughts on what might be happening? Using Mutt 1.5.13 connecting to an Imap server. Thanks. -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [OT] buffy like tool for the console

t i were after! There's also mailcheck. http://mailcheck.sourceforge.net/ http://packages.debian.org/mailcheck Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

folder_format %N not working after upgrade to 1.5.16

e reason, they are not showing up in the file browser display in 1.5.16. Any one see this happen before? Thanks Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: connecting to imap

bscribed= yes set imap_user = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" set imap_pass = "xxx" set imap_passive = yes set imap_peek = yes set imap_servernoise = yes set imap_home_namespace = "imaps://mydomain.com" set imap_headers = "" set imap_idle = no Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: moving through mailboxes with new mail

On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 03:42:06PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote.. > Under this new imap setup, I've got most things working except for > this 'c' functionality. The first time I hit it, it takes me to > the first mailbox in my mailboxes list that has new mail. The &g

Re: How to specify multiple alternates

On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 08:44:22PM +0100, Chris G wrote.. > The manual just says:- > > set alternates= > > How does one specify a collection of different addresses? Is it just > || ? Like this: alternates "[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECT

moving through mailboxes with new mail

bscribed imap_passive imap_peek using 'mailboxes' and not using it Thanks Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: mutt, spamcop, and vi: header weeding

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 05:20:14PM -0600, Travis H. wrote.. > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 04:49:46PM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote: > > macro index \cx ":set autoedit=no fast_reply=yes \ > > editor=\"/bin/true\"\nsubmit.xx \ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:set auto

Re: mutt, spamcop, and vi: header weeding

made sure that /usr/bin/editor resolves to a real editor. The error message I get back from spamcop is: SpamCop could not find your spam message in this email: ... Any thoughts on the above macro? Has anyone a similar, working version? Thanks Kevin -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

mixmaster

utt didn't have mixmaster compiled in, as I've already wasted too much time on this. :-) Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30789/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

t-prot

Anyone have any experience using t-prot? I saw it in the Debian archives, and it looks like an interesting filter for TOFU and unwanted footers, etc. Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30706/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: spamassassin

> for x in `awk '{if ( $1 == "From:") { for (x = 1 ; x <= NF ; > x++) { if ($x ~ /[^ ]*@[^ ]*/) { gsub("<|>", "", $x) ; print $x } } > }}'` > do > echo $x >> $SPAMMERSFILE > echo "blacklist_from $x" >> $SPAMASSASSINFILE > done > > [...] -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30339/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: spamassassin

| spamassassin -r" "report message to Vipul's Razor" " > Just tryin' to help... > Thanks! You've been very helpful to me. Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30338/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

spamassassin

, but why would it be looking for audio/x-wav files? Thanks in advance for any tips. Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg30313/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Adressbook?

On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 11:59:24PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote.. > So sprach Kevin Coyner am 2002-06-14 um 17:43:27 -0400 : > > I started using abook yesterday, so I can't really give a solid > > Thanks, will try it. > > > addresses from within mutt. One thi

Re: Adressbook?

ECTED] >iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen >Uptime: 17 hours 9 minutes -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg29012/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: navigation questions from a newbie

On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 11:19:34AM -0400, Brett Sanger wrote.. > Okay, just started using mutt, (previously used pine, decided to make the > switch). I've heard pretty much nothing but good things about mutt, so > I'm assuming most of my issues can be resolved, I just don't know how. I > h

Re: signed email and OE

> > % that MS products are not my first choice in software. However, many of > % my friends use these products, in particular Outlook Express. > > Friends don't let friends use Outlook :-) > LOL ! > > % > % Recently I started GPG signing most of my emails, and have found that > % the re

signed email and OE

t settings to get around this OE shortcoming? Obviously I can set up send-hooks with and without the signature, but this presumes I know beforehand what client the recipient is using. Is there another way? Thanks Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941

Re: GnuPG - verify signatures

On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 07:09:18AM -0500, David T-G wrote.. > Kevin, et al -- > > % > % I'm using the new 1.0.7, > > OK. If you've never used gpg before this then you're probably fine; if > you're upgrading, there are some particular caveats. > New user. Can't you tell? I thought it w

urlview: console vs xterm

application/x-tar-gz; gunzip -c %s|tar -tf -; copiousoutput As always, thanks, Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 msg28807/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: GnuPG - verify signatures

On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 10:26:26PM -0500, David T-G wrote.. > Kevin -- > > ...and then Kevin Coyner said... > % > % I've recently installed mutt and loving it. Now I'm taking a stab at > % getting my GnuPG key associated with mutt, verifying sigs, etc. > &

Re: trash patch

On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 12:05:22AM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote.. > Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I thought I'd give the trash patch a try, but being inexperienced with > > command line patches, I've run into the following error, although I >

GnuPG - verify signatures

I've recently installed mutt and loving it. Now I'm taking a stab at getting my GnuPG key associated with mutt, verifying sigs, etc. I've got it working such that I can send my signature and send encrypted, but for some reason I can't verify the sigs of others. Here's what I have in my .muttrc

trash patch

I thought I'd give the trash patch a try, but being inexperienced with command line patches, I've run into the following error, although I thought I had the right syntax [kosuke@sumida mutt-1.4]$ patch -p1 < patch-1.4.trash.txt can't find file to patch at input line 4 Perhaps you used the w

maildir vs mbox

I don't want to start a religious war, but is there consensus opinion as to whether mbox or Maildir is better? I know mutt supports both automatically, so it's probably a bit of a mute question, but mutt also gives you the option of specifying which format new folders are set up in, so I thought

Re: urlview

David -- again, thanks for the help . On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:50:52PM -0500, David T-G wrote.. > Kevin - > > ...and then Kevin Coyner said... > % > % David --- > % > % On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:11:24PM -0500, David T-G wrote.. > % > Did you hit r

Re: urlview

ng the REGEXP (I forget whether REGEXP is necessary or if > I've simply tweaked the default). > > > HTH & HAND > > :-D > -- -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941

urlview

I just installed urlview and gave it a try on a message that I knew to have a few links. Sure enough it listed the links and gave an arrow that allowed me to select one of the links. When I selected, it rewrote the link down at the bottom of the screen. But after that, nothing, regardless of w

trash function (was 3 quick questions)

On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 07:32:58PM +0200, Thorsten Haude wrote: > * darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-06-07 14:18]: > >I have been using this setup for over a year, and it works great: > [Macro-based trash function] > You should have a look at Cedric's patch. I used something similar to >

Re: ask-from quadoption was 3 quick questions

On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 09:37:12AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: > * Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-07 09:28]: > > Many thanks for the patch. I'll give it a try, but have to learn how > > to apply them first. I've graduated from windoze to linux rp

ask-from quadoption was 3 quick questions

On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 08:13:40AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote: > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-06 16:40]: > > Well here's a feature request. I wish there were an option to have > > mutt prompt you for which return address to use, being able to pick > > from a menu of addresses

delete messages to trash - was 3 quick questions

t of an understatement. And even better, I'm starting to understand some of this stuff (the hooks), although I must admit the push statement will take some more studying ...! Thanks, Kevin > > (darren) > > -- > We can't all, and some of us don't. That's all there is to it. > -- Eeyore -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941

3 quick questions

First, thanks to everyone so far for their help. I'm finding Mutt challenging but fun, and with the help from this group, it's even better. Second, 3 quick questions: 1. Where do D (deleted) msgs go? Is there an equivalent of trash, or am I truly out of the disneyland GUI world now and just

Re: [Re: NuBe: upgrade question]

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 12:40:44PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Kevin -- > > ...and then Kevin Coyner said... > % > % Wow Wow. I see that I've a lot to learn. > > We all do. Don't worry; it'll come! > > > % > % I'm really liking Mutt, but in all honesty it's a lot

recommend good address book

As the newest Mutt user on the block (and definitely still trying to figure things out), one of the things I'm leaving behind with KMail is the KAddressbook. The two integrated pretty well. I'm enjoying using Mutt, although mangling the messages, but am wondering whether there is a good console

Re: [Re: NuBe: upgrade question]

Wow Wow. I see that I've a lot to learn. I'm really liking Mutt, but in all honesty it's a lot of work to put everything together. Ultimately that flexibility is the beauty of Mutt, but to get started is a steep learning curve, especially if you are relatively new to Linux, and even newer to th