On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:37:26AM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote...... > > Yes, I'm aware of this. But still, somehow I feel, that the original > author didn't have this in his mind (correct me if I'm wrong, of > course). Although, maybe I'm trying to be too besserwisser here and > speculating things that I shouldn't be doing. > > I'm just wondering if the original author really meant '-d' option, or > something different. I just pointed it out (as did someone else, I > Oops. Yes, I did mean '-r' and not '-d'. I set my SP up directly with the tips from http://codesorcery.net/docs/spamtricks.html. Specifically ..... "2. Another trick is a combination of configurations that allows you to both see whether something is listed in Vipul's Razor, (one of the tests used in SpamAssassin) and to report it to Razor if it is not. To let you know if it's already reported: message-hook "~h RAZOR" "unignore X-Spam-Status" If it's not reported (and you choose to), you may easily report the mail with the keystroke S if you use this: macro index S "| spamassassin -r" "report message to Vipul's Razor" " > Just tryin' to help... > Thanks! You've been very helpful to me. Kevin -- Kevin Coyner mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
msg30338/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
