On 30.07.2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> A top posting we see, when in the body of the mail before a line like
> this:
>
> On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> are some other text lines. Of course we need here a good regular
> expression because the line 'On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote
On 17.07.2015, Aurélien Rivet wrote:
> I have joined the content of my .muttrc with dummy address and password.
> I really appreciate any help you can provide.
First: I'm not using hotmail/outlook and have therefore no clue what
causes the behaviour you describe.
But why are you convinced it is
On 16.07.2015, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> I'll recompile without hcache and report back.
Ok, done. Still, hcache is a huge improvement in the way I reported in
my other mails.
On 15.07.2015, Will Yardley wrote:
> Did you time the load with header caching disabled as well?
No, in fact I didn't.
> I've found that opening an uncached folder, or a folder where the cache
> is very out of date, sometimes can take a bit longer (while the cache is
> being built, presumably),
On 15.07.2015, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > I'm using both IMAP and maildir, and hcache is a real and quite
> > noticeable improvement.
> FWIW, I use maildir too but locally, and turning hcache on did not
> result in a clear speed up. My largest folders are around 5000 messages
> each.
I have mai
On 14.07.2015, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> I think the hcache helps to alleviate network latency (pop/imap) and for
> opening and closing thousands of files (maildir/mh).
Jepp! And for IMAP, it may not be neccessary at all to read more than
the header of most of the mails. Ex: a large mailing lis
On 13.07.2015, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Eric Smith [07-13-15 09:17]:
> > Has anyone implemented this or is considering to do so?
> Been using it for *quite* a few years now.
AFAIK, mutt's header cache only works for IMAP and Maildir, but not
for the mbox format.
On 21.06.2015, jonas hedman wrote:
> I think I have to convince my friends to get decent email clients =)
A lot of people I communicate with use Thunderbird. You can rest
assured that it will properly decrypt gpg-encrypted emails, and it's
not too hard to handle either.
On 21.06.2015, jonas hedman wrote:
> I'm from Sweden and I occasionally communicate with other swedish people
> using pgp and I've stumbled upon this problem:
> If I encrypt a message containg any of the swedish letters "åÅäÄöÖ"
> using inline format everythings works just fine but when I encrypt
On 12.05.2015, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> For the index view, you can achieve this with a custom index_format like
> this:
[]
This is clearly the best solution! Thanks for sharing!
On 12.05.2015, Erik Christiansen wrote:
> Heinz, it can all be done in one line of sed, included in the procmail
> rule.
Yes, it can :-)
All those lines were just a quick hack to demonstrate that it can easily be
done without altering mutts sourcecode.
On 11.05.2015, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> 2. Mailman managed lists (and maybe others) insert the annoying [Foo-List]
> tags in the Subject header. Other MUAs allow one to massage the Subject
> header (for display only) so as to hide the tag, and (again) save screen
> space. Is this possible with mu
On 28.04.2015, Xu Wang wrote:
> Does someone have a script that they would be
> interested in sharing which does a build that is sensible?
Usually, I'm building it the easy way:
1. configure --enable-imap --enable-hcache --with-ssl --with-sasl
2. make
3. make install
> For example, how to buil
On 17.04.2015, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
> https://pbrisbin.com/posts/mairix/
Thanks a lot, Bastian. Will take a look.
On 17.04.2015, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > macro index "=.Search" "Load the search results"
> > macro pager "=.Search" "Load the search results"
> I believe those last two lines can be replaced with:
> macro index,pager "=.Search" "Load the search
> results"
Yes, they can. Thanks!
On 16.04.2015, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> > If there is interest I'll share some config and scripts on the mairix
> > setup.
> Please go ahead ;-)
Btw, this is my setup. It's quite minimalistic.
[htd@chiara ~]$ cat .mairixrc
base=~/Maildir
mfolder=.Search
database=~/.mai
On 16.04.2015, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
> Also the fcc is set to inbox so that I can see in threaded view the
> history of dialogs/threads.
I'm doing virtually the same by specifying
set record="+.INBOX"
> To search the mailboxes I use mairix which I invoke inside mutt via a
> key-bind. V
On 16.04.2015, Suvayu Ali wrote:
> ..I just tag it archived, and it disappears from my virtual
> folder. The physical message stays in the original mailbox as before.
Interesting. To what degree does this actually penalize performance?
I'm using good old procmail to mak a copy of every mail tha
On 04.04.2015, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> I'm cleaning up and looking into committing the multiple crypt hook
> patch, but need some feedback from people who use it.
Where can I find the patch?
On 31.03.2015, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> I've been working on this patch series for a while, and finally
> committed it to the repository yesterday. For those of you who would
> like to "encrypt by default" and don't mind compiling from the
> repository, please check it out.
Cool! Works for me
Hi,
when trying to encrypt a message in mutt, pressing "p" brings on the common pgp
dialog:
PGP (e)ncrypt, (s)ign, sign (a)s, (b)oth, or (c)lear?
Pressing "e" sets the "encrypt" flag. Then, when sending the mail, I'm asked to
enter a key id. Now, when I hit "ENTER", the listing of my public key
On 24.03.2015, Joe M wrote:
> Is it possible to configure mutt to ignore the reply (>) portion of
> the email when spell-checking.
In case you're using emacs within mutt: you can simply select the text to be
spell-checked, and invoke hunspell via "M-x ispell". "r" replaces the wrong
word, and sp
On 14.03.2015, Peter P. wrote:
> how can I configure mutt to always attach my public GPG key to signed
> messages without manually having to ESC-k and selecting the correct key?
Besides exploring mutts macro functionality already mentioned in this thread,
it could be an idea to copy your pubkey
On 11.03.2015, Silvio Siefke wrote:
> Now must find way to convert my old mail files mh to mutt and im happy.
http://www.informatik-vollmer.de/software/mh2maildir.php
On 19.02.2015, Philippe Delavalade wrote:
> mutt -f inbox_archive.gz
> I have an error message because it is not a mailbox.
Try with the .gz unpacked.
AFAIK, archivemail does not use SSL/TLS to connect tou your server.
Maybe you should consider using offlineimap or sth. similar.
w: (on Linux) when setlocale() queries the current locale and finds ""
(nothing), then it will set the default locale from the contents of LANG.
--
# Heinz Diehl, 68259 Mannheim, Germany
d the "charset-hook" option, and setting
'charset-hook "" iso-8859-1' did the trick for mail without further
specification of a special charset in the "Content-type:" header.
Thanks for your help!
--
# Heinz Diehl, 68259 Mannheim, Germany
dn't lead me
further.
Locale is set-up and works properly, so this can't be the cause.
Does anybody have a small hint for me?
--
# Heinz Diehl, 68259 Mannheim, Germany
On Fri Dec 24 1999, Bram Shirani wrote:
> gcc: Internal compiler error: program cpp got fatal signal 11
If it stops always at the same position it is usually a software
problem, e.g. there is a bug somewhere, this must not be in the
mutt code itself, it can also be in the kernel code or somewher
On Wed Dec 22 1999, Clint Olsen wrote:
> I am wondering which is the latest version of slang recommended for use with
> Mutt 1.X? Currently I'm using 1.2.2. I tried some of the later slang
> releases and had some problems with the main Mutt menu and was told to bug
> John Davis.
The latest ver
On Tue Oct 05 1999, David DeSimone wrote:
> Mutt had/has a known problem where it will dump core if it encounters a
> message which has no Message-ID header. Is there such a message in your
> mailbox?
Yep, now it is, for I have created one, for testing purpose :)
Mutt-0.96.7i and 1.0pre3i have
On Mon Oct 04 1999, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> I'm having a same kind of problem. The glibc is version 2.1.1 and is
> installed right out of the box from a SuSE 6.2 disc, only a few days
> ago. Last night i have installed Mutt 1.0pre3i.
> Now Mutt gives me "Sorting mailbox...Segmentation fault" error.
On Sat Sep 25 1999, peter pilsl wrote:
> I was using mutt for a long time without any problems. A few days ago I
> decided to upgrade to mutt1.0pre2i and now I am doomed.
If this is a problem related to a new glibc, you have to recompile
a few things, e.g. ncurses and slang, they have to be link
On Sun Sep 26 1999, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> can not guess host type: you must specify one
I'm quoting myself here, the solution to this problem is
trivial, the GCC-2.95.x install routines does not create a
simple link "cc" to "gcc" :)
~ hd
Hi !
After upgrading from GCC-2.7.2.3 to 2.96, the Mutt configure-script
exits with
can not guess host type: you must specify one
After switching back to GCC-2.7.2.3, it works again.
Does anybody know where configure gets this "host system type"
(which says "i586-pc-linux-gnu") ?
GCC-
35 matches
Mail list logo
