Re: message hook help please

2008-04-13 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2008-04-13, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008, Christian Ebert wrote: > > > message-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'alternative_order text/html > > > text/plain text/html' > > > > Why text/html twice? > > Woops. :) I took that out. > > > > message-hook . 'alternati

Re: send-hook not working

2008-04-13 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2008-04-13, Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-04-13, Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ++ 13/04/08 20:53 +0200 - Kirill Miazine: > > >>>If this one is removed, it works. I am wondering why I put that line > > >>>there in the first place. So, now running without this line

Re: send-hook not working

2008-04-13 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 13/04/08 22:36 +0200 - Kirill Miazine: >>With the first one, it doesn't work. Without the first line, it does. > >Yes, that does make sense and actually behaves the way I would expect. >To me it seems that your send-hooks will be flushed immediately after >you enter a folder. What is the first l

Re: send-hook not working

2008-04-13 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2008-04-13, Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ++ 13/04/08 20:53 +0200 - Kirill Miazine: > >>>If this one is removed, it works. I am wondering why I put that line > >>>there in the first place. So, now running without this line and see > >>>what else is broken. :) > >> > >>iirc, hooks act

Re: extract_url.pl: A Better URL Viewer

2008-04-13 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, April 2 at 10:14 AM, quoth Stefan Wimmer: >If I run "cat |$HOME/bin/extract_url.pl" in bash I get the >list as expected and the script does not freeze!!! > >It won't make me go back to bash but at least you know now what causes the >pro

Re: message hook help please

2008-04-13 Thread Ken Weingold
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008, Christian Ebert wrote: > > message-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'alternative_order text/html text/plain > > text/html' > > Why text/html twice? Woops. :) I took that out. > > message-hook . 'alternative_order text/plain text/html text/rtf > > text/x-vcard application/ms-t

Re: message hook help please

2008-04-13 Thread Christian Ebert
* Ken Weingold on Sunday, April 13, 2008 at 17:42:39 -0400 > Thanks, I've tried everything, but nothing works for me. There's no > error from mutt, just that whatever I try, every message gets > displayed as plain text or HTML. I just can't get it to only display > as HTML for that one address.

Re: message hook help please

2008-04-13 Thread Ken Weingold
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008, Rado S wrote: > Yes, see DebugConfig on wiki and also re-read the introduction to > hooks. Thanks, I've tried everything, but nothing works for me. There's no error from mutt, just that whatever I try, every message gets displayed as plain text or HTML. I just can't get it

Re: send-hook not working

2008-04-13 Thread Kirill Miazine
* Rejo Zenger [2008-04-13 20:59]: [...] Correctly. I had this order: folder-hook . unhook send-hook send-hook ."unset pgp_autoencrypt" send-hook '^~C "set pgp_autoencrypt=yes" With the first one, it doesn't work. Without the first line, it does.

Re: send-hook not working

2008-04-13 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 13/04/08 20:53 +0200 - Kirill Miazine: >>>If this one is removed, it works. I am wondering why I put that line >>>there in the first place. So, now running without this line and see >>>what else is broken. :) >> >>iirc, hooks act on the first match found. > >This is not actually true for *all* h

Re: send-hook not working

2008-04-13 Thread Kirill Miazine
* Patrick Shanahan [2008-04-13 08:55]: [...] I nailed down the problem. As one of the first hooks I have: folder-hook . unhook send-hook If this one is removed, it works. I am wondering why I put that line there in the first place. So, now running without this line and see wh

Re: complete-query key binding question

2008-04-13 Thread Marianne Promberger
On 04/13/08 15:03, Rado S wrote: > =- Marianne Promberger wrote on Sun 13.Apr'08 at 13:21:56 +0100 -= > > > This works fine: > > bindeditor"\e\t" complete-query > > But really, I'd rather bind it to Ctrl-Tab, but this > > bindeditor"\C\t" complete-query > > doesn't do the trick -

Re: complete-query key binding question

2008-04-13 Thread Rado S
=- Marianne Promberger wrote on Sun 13.Apr'08 at 13:21:56 +0100 -= > What does "^T" stand for? I can't figure this out. Certanily, the > actual "^" and "T" keys don't work for me. Ctrl-T (or Strg-T) > This works fine: > bindeditor"\e\t" complete-query > But really, I'd rather bind it to

Re: send-hook not working

2008-04-13 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Rejo Zenger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-13-08 04:31]: > ++ 12/04/08 23:19 +0200 - Sander Smeenk: > >That's weird. > > I nailed down the problem. As one of the first hooks I have: > > folder-hook . unhook send-hook > > If this one is removed, it works. I am wondering why I put th

complete-query key binding question

2008-04-13 Thread Marianne Promberger
Hi List, The mutt manual says: "In any prompt for address entry, you can use the complete-query function (default: ^T) ... " What does "^T" stand for? I can't figure this out. Certanily, the actual "^" and "T" keys don't work for me. So I tried rebinding This works fine: bindeditor"\e

Re: message hook help please

2008-04-13 Thread Rado S
=- Ken Weingold wrote on Sat 12.Apr'08 at 19:54:50 -0400 -= > I get messages from one person that are always on one line. It's > from the Sun Java Messenger thing. I tried a message hook to > handle the messages from that one address as HTML, but I don't > want this default for every message. It's

Re: send-hook not working

2008-04-13 Thread Rejo Zenger
++ 12/04/08 23:19 +0200 - Sander Smeenk: >That's weird. I nailed down the problem. As one of the first hooks I have: folder-hook . unhook send-hook If this one is removed, it works. I am wondering why I put that line there in the first place. So, now running without this line