Ok, I've recompiled mutt with Vsevolod Volkoy's NNTP patch, and I've
been poking around a bit... but I can't for the life of my figure out
how to configure mutt for NNTP now that it is compiled properly. Anybody
know what I have to do?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This message has b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Okay, a bit of history. I'm currently a Pine user and I'm considering
switching to Mutt since I have need of useable and useful PGP/GPG
handling.
I have one local machine and two remote IMAP machines, each of which have
mail folders on them. For
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 10:01:46PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
> Thank you, Chris. I'm glad to see/use your script with my mutt. Please
> post it.
Several people have contacted me about the script I use for sending
receipts. I decided just to post it here for anyone who wants it.
There's a couple
I have an Exchange server I use at work and I do a lot of access from home.
I have set up a Procmail recipe that will build an SSH tunnel between my
machine at work an my machine at home so that I can have direct access
from home (baby VPN setup). The question I have is:
Can I use something like
After talking to Michael Elkins for a little
this pretty much seems like a bug.
It appears that mutt is moving new messages from my new/ dir to the cur/
(I am running Maildir). So this is why N randomly appears in front of the
folder name. However, 5 minutes later Mutt (or not?) moves messages to
Hi Christian,
> I agree with everything you say (though I do hope the story about
> rebinding the y-key was a joke). Your patch is important for the
> wide-spread use of PGP in non-english communication.
Why? It's the best I could come up with.
> I just checked that with your patch, I can fi
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11 Jan 2002 16:37 -0700]:
> > 9o)
>
> BTW, what the heck is that thing?
He has a big nose and a monocle, obviously.
--
http://www.epic.org - Electronic Privacy Information Center
msg22976/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Viktor,
I agree with everything you say (though I do hope the story about
rebinding the y-key was a joke). Your patch is important for the
wide-spread use of PGP in non-english communication.
I just checked that with your patch, I can finally use Mutt to sign
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
> ...and then Nick Wilson said...
> % In my muttrc I have set the hostname="localhost" 'cos that's what it is.
So if I were to email root@localhost, which one of us do you think would
get the message? You should pick a better hostname ;)
> You really should pick a coo
Alas! Stephan Seitz spake thus:
> > Getting needed keys from a keyserver is completely a function of
> > your pgp/gpg program... the keyserver line is all that's needed if
> > you're using gpg. (Well, it works for verifying sigs anyway... I've
>
> Fine, but IIRC that only works if I wish to veri
Alas! Knute spake thus:
> This is quoted text: - End forwarded message -
>
> So what do you think?
> (I think I need to put on my asbestos long john's!)
You die. You die and go to hell!
Just kidding ;)
> 9o)
BTW, what the heck is that thing?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Alas! Knute spake thus:
> > --== Jerri ==--
> > Homepage: http://www.jerri.de/ ICQ: 54160208
>
> It could be, ...
No, I'm certain that that is Jerri's homepage and ICQ number.
_PLEASE_ put your response directly after what you are replying to, it
makes everything so much easier to underst
Alas! Roman Neuhauser spake thus:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
I
Hi David,
David T-G wrote:
> How, however, is the proposed behavior (making $p_c_t generate a
> text/plain instead of an application/pgp message) different from what we
> have now with $p_c_t and $p_o_c? Note that I don't say that it fixes the
> problem you bring up, but it will fix the problem
Hi folks,
I've been using Mutt for quite some time, and now I have a problem. My
current mutt (1.2.5i on FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE) seems to have some
problems:
I have set up mutt so that it accesses new mail that has been filtered into
my various inboxes and, once I have read these new messages, mo
At 17:04 -0600 10 Jan 2002, I wrote:
> http://schrab.com/aaron/mutt/patch-1.3.24.ats.date_optional.1
Unfortunately, that URL won't work for anybody but me. The correct one
is:
http://pug.schrab.com/aaron/mutt/patch-1.3.24.ats.date_optional.1
--
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http
Thank you very much, Cristiano.
Thanks to this MAGIC setting, now the pager display right.
Frankly speaking, I've read 'charset-hook' section of the manual a
couple of times, which defines "alias". I can hardly imagine we can set
and use it this way. :-)
best regards,
charlie
On Fri, Jan 11, 2
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:24:47PM +, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> Yeah, but the problem is that when 'chitchat' spins off from another
> thread, it rarely (in my experience) ends up getting moved. Although if
> people think that it will actually get used, I would support it
We had the "chitchat
Hello List,
It has been a long time since i posted questions here, because RTFM is a
magical thing. Well, this time it is something i can not solve on my
own...
I have been doing some changes to my ~/.muttrc, restructuring stuff and so
on. Tried to use IMAP but since i did not have time to figur
At 09:00 +0100 11 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can anyone make sense of the output I'm getting when trying to use the
> %_patch?
> can't find file to patch at input line 4
> Perhaps you should have used the -p or --strip option?
The above line is patch itself telling you wh
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To really do it right you should get a domain and have that at your house,
> but realistically you could probably use home.explodingnet.com (since
> you control the domain and it's your home computer) or nick.yourisp.com
> (though that won't show up in a DN
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% * On 11-01-02 at 19:20
% * David T-G said
%
% > You really should pick a cool name for your machine, you know :-)
%
% Well, I had named it explodingnet.com (my websites name also) but then I
No, that won't work, as you saw; there already is on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 19:20
* David T-G said
>
> You really should pick a cool name for your machine, you know :-)
>
Well, I had named it explodingnet.com (my websites name also) but then I
had problems mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] Still trying to c
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> stuff to mutt-use
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi again!
Hiya!
%
% I'm having a problem posting to another list. I get this from time to
% time on various addresses and in various situations.
Interesting that it's not on all mail that you send...
%
% All of my mail is grabbed by fetchmail a
Will --
...and then Will Yardley said...
%
% Michael P. Soulier wrote:
% >
% > Strange. I just looked in the mutt manual that comes with my 1.3.24-2
% > Debian package, and there's no pgp_outlook_compat option listed. But, if I put
% > it in my .muttrc, Mutt doesn't complain. Should I file
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Krennmair said...
%
% * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020111 16:28]:
% > Nicolas Rachinsky has written a patch to allow you to execute a macro
% > only if there are tagged messages and either eat a portion of or entirely
% > abort the macro if there aren't. You c
Michael --
...and then Michael P. Soulier said...
%
% On 08/12/01 Brian Clark did speaketh:
%
...
% > set pgp_create_traditional=yes
% > set pgp_outlook_compat=yes
%
% Strange. I just looked in the mutt manual that comes with my 1.3.24-2
% Debian package, and there's no pgp_outlook_compat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 18:52
* Will Yardley said
> Nick Wilson wrote:
> >
> > I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
> > the other rubbish to make it easier to search through.
> >
> > Just wondered how you good peopl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again!
I'm having a problem posting to another list. I get this from time to
time on various addresses and in various situations.
All of my mail is grabbed by fetchmail and sorted by procmail and then
read by mutt.
In my muttrc I have set the ho
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020111 16:28]:
> Nicolas Rachinsky has written a patch to allow you to execute a macro
> only if there are tagged messages and either eat a portion of or entirely
> abort the macro if there aren't. You can get it from
>
> http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/mutt.h
Nick Wilson wrote:
>
> I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
> the other rubbish to make it easier to search through.
>
> Just wondered how you good people did this?
if you have the Trash patch applied, you can do something like this:
folder-hook . se
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
> Strange. I just looked in the mutt manual that comes with my 1.3.24-2
> Debian package, and there's no pgp_outlook_compat option listed. But, if I put
> it in my .muttrc, Mutt doesn't complain. Should I file a bug report with
> Debian that the manual is out of da
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:27:47 -0800
> From: "J. Scott Dorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Anh Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette
>
> Nah. :) He coulda just highlighted the appropriate lines (via shift-v or some
> such) then ':s/^/This is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
Currently I delete all the mail I no longer wish to see in my mailboxes
and it gets sent to ~/Mail/Trash
All well and good.
I'd like somehow to archive my list mail rather than dump it with all
the other rubbish to make it easier to searc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 17:29
* Samuel Padgett said
> Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Don't know what you mean but I've fixed it. It was a silly error
> > I'd made. It's just one of those days.
>
> Can you tell us what was wrong and ho
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:56:07PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> This was a duplicate message apparently inserted at trymedia.com.
> It's certainly not the version of the message I sent out.
Looks like someone re-injected. Next time I'll check more carefully.
Sorry (also can't find any tryme
This was a duplicate message apparently inserted at trymedia.com.
It's certainly not the version of the message I sent out.
On 2002-01-11 01:54:49 -0800, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:46:15AM -0600, Anh Lai wrote:
>
> ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> >
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This is quoted text:
On 08/12/01 Brian Clark did speaketh:
> * Michael P. Soulier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Dec 08. 2001 16:35]:
>
> > When I send a digitally signed email to some users using M$ Lookout!, they are
> > immediately prompted for an encryption scheme and they cannot even open my
> > email until they set one
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Jan 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% >
% > Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
% > Jan 01 message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (which
% > was PGP-MIME signed, I noted, while this one isn't)? It's
I sometimes spell check my messages before I send them using
Ispell (actually, Aspell), and often I have no errors. When this
is the case, however, Mutt does not indicate that the spell
checker ran at all! Is there any way I can tell Mutt to display a
message, for instance, "Ispell exited with r
Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Don't know what you mean but I've fixed it. It was a silly error
> I'd made. It's just one of those days.
Can you tell us what was wrong and how you fixed it (just in case
we ever run into the same problem)?
Thanks,
Sam
I had the same problem an used:
charset-hook "" iso-8859-1
I think you can use:
charset-hook "" big5
This will match any message without 'charset' specified.
Hope this helps
[]'s
- Cristiano
Em Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Charles Jie escreveu:
> In our country, I used to receive messages without 'c
On Jan 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...and then Thomas Roessler said...
> %
> % Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 01:54:49 -0800 (PST)
> %
> ...
> % mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
>
> Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
> Jan 01 me
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 23:05:19 +0800, Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, Boris.
>
> But that's weird for your case. If you have attachment, your header
> should have only 'Content-Type: multipart/...' instead of 'text/plain'
> or 'text/html'.
-- but every attachment has its own `C
On Freitag, 11. Jan. 2002 at 16:11:54, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
> Currently, I'm letting my emails "time out" by adding a folder-hook like
> this one:
> folder-hook =mutt-users 'push T~r>w!~F\n\;s=archive/mutt-users\n\n'
>
> But there is one annoying thing I was unable to remove:
> when no mess
Knute --
...and then Knute said...
%
% On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
%
% > ...and then mike ledoux said...
% > %
% > % On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:35:29PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% > % > Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
% > % > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:47:01PM -0500, Samue
Andreas --
...and then Andreas Krennmair said...
%
% Hello!
Hi!
%
% Currently, I'm letting my emails "time out" by adding a folder-hook like
% this one:
% folder-hook =mutt-users 'push T~r>w!~F\n\;s=archive/mutt-users\n\n'
%
% But there is one annoying thing I was unable to remove:
% when n
Hello!
Currently, I'm letting my emails "time out" by adding a folder-hook like
this one:
folder-hook =mutt-users 'push T~r>w!~F\n\;s=archive/mutt-users\n\n'
But there is one annoying thing I was unable to remove:
when no messages are tagged (since no old messages are in the folder),
the message
Thank you, Boris.
But that's weird for your case. If you have attachment, your header
should have only 'Content-Type: multipart/...' instead of 'text/plain'
or 'text/html'.
For my cases, they have the latter content-type and no attachment. They
send me inline 8-bit muitibyte (big5) text. Mutt wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Derek D. Martin hath spake thusly:
> At some point hitherto, Anh Lai hath spake thusly:
> > How do I make mutt color lines starting with % as a quote just like >
> >
> > apparently David only uses this, and i would like to lea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Anh Lai hath spake thusly:
> How do I make mutt color lines starting with % as a quote just like >
>
> apparently David only uses this, and i would like to learn how to add %
> as a quote indicator.
Hmm.. well, speaking for m
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Anh Lai wrote:
>
>
> ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> >
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This is quoted text: > somewhat diffe
Why does signal an error when the mailbox is empty?
Shouldn't it just be a no-op?
The error foils these macros:
macro index y "?"
macro pager y "?"
Thanks,
Sam
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
> Mike, et al --
>
> ...and then mike ledoux said...
> %
> % On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:35:29PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> % > Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
> % > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:47:01PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote:
> % > > > Wow.
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Gerhard Siegesmund wrote:
>
> > Well, I think mines longest so far but like Knute I downloaded and then
> > modified. (That's kinda like an artificial extension or implants: Just
> > as impressive visually but we all know they're fake!)
> > Weighing in at a whopping 2036 no
Agree with you, too. Your post showed one well-tailored. :-)
best,
charlie
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:55:24AM +0100, Volker Moell wrote:
> Charles Jie wrote:
> > I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
> > programs.
>
> But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just rea
Thank you, Chris. I'm glad to see/use your script with my mutt. Please
post it.
I've ever thought to leave a mark for 'receipt-sent' in the header with
a specific field (say, X-Receipt) or some common field. But it looks
making management of mbox complicated. Your marking strategy should be
bette
Viktor --
...and then Viktor Rosenfeld said...
%
% [CC'd to mutt-dev b/c of attached patch, I'm not on mutt-dev, so please
% CC me in replies]
I trust that's not required for mutt-users...
%
% Cristian wrote:
%
% > What has confused a few people is the fact that the patch is effective
% > o
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
>
> This is quoted text:
> This is quoted text:
> This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is quoted text: > somewhat different but related:
> This is quoted text: >
> This is quot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 14:34
* David T-G said
> ...and then Nick Wilson said...
> %
> % Hi all,
> % can anyone make sense of the output I'm getting when trying to use the
> % %_patch?
>
> I get this all the time. Someone suggested a way to work a
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 08:32:24AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
> Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
> Jan 01 message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (which
> was PGP-MIME signed, I noted, while this one isn't)? It's
Hi, all --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
%
% Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 01:54:49 -0800 (PST)
%
...
% mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
Didn't we see these come out already? Is this somehow different from the
Jan 01 message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (which
was PGP-MIME signed,
Nick --
...and then Nick Wilson said...
%
% Hi all,
% can anyone make sense of the output I'm getting when trying to use the
% %_patch?
I get this all the time. Someone suggested a way to work around it, but
I've neither looked into it yet nor even retained the pointer :-(
%
% Here it is..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 14:19
* boris karlov said
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:30:04 +0100, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> > I'm getting this odd error when sending to a particular address.
> >
> > :error sending message, child exi
Michael --
...and then Michael Maibaum said...
%
% On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 02:00:18PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > ...and then Michael Maibaum said...
% > %
% > % obbsessive sense of tidieness I would like to move them to a subdir
% > % called outbox/
...
% > Use the %O expando (that's an o
Dan --
While you're setting up your editor, would you mind terribly asking it to
wrap lines (insert line breaks) at around 72 chars?
...and then dan radom said...
%
% Is it possible to create a macro that can be used when composing an email? I like
to trim my emails as much as possible, and
Mike, et al --
...and then mike ledoux said...
%
% On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:35:29PM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
% > Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
% > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 04:47:01PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote:
% > > > Wow. You have a 462+ line .muttrc?
% > >
% > > come on, who
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:40:27PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Of course :-)
> What about the workaround of sending a probe and waiting to see if that
> bounces, perhaps having sent it after a delay?
that would involve intelligence, and something more than majordomo
does at the moment.
Steve
--
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:30:04 +0100, Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
> I'm getting this odd error when sending to a particular address.
>
> :error sending message, child exited 67 (User unkown)
-- imho, that's MTA report.
10x, karlov.
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-10 20:15]:
> Alas! Andreas Reinhold spake thus:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:59:59PM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> > > macro pager d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> > > macro index d "=trash" "move message to trash folder"
> > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm getting this odd error when sending to a particular address.
:error sending message, child exited 67 (User unkown)
Hmmm.. What's all that about then?
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:www.explodingne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On 11-01-02 at 11:20
* Nick Wilson said
> Hi I've put this line in my rc file.
>
> fcc-save-hook . Outbox/%O
>
> and I'm getting an error when starting mutt, 'variable not found'
> and i can't find it in the manual.
>
> er, help?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi I've put this line in my rc file.
fcc-save-hook . Outbox/%O
and I'm getting an error when starting mutt, 'variable not found'
and i can't find it in the manual.
er, help?
- --
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
W
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:44:17PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
>
> ...and then Hanspeter Roth said...
>
> % Maybe once when I think I can't explore anymore usefull in mutt, I
> % might look at pine.
>
> Many here would grin widely at that and tell you the day will never come!
Never mind!
-Hanspet
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
These releases both fix a security hole which can be remotely
exploited. The problem was foun
Hi!
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 03:15:33PM -0500, Walt Mankowski wrote
> You could try adding
> set edit_headers
> to your .muttrc and edit the subject inside vim.
Thanks, yes, that is a way, but I thought mutt had its own way for
doing this because it handles utf8 very well.
Shade and sweet water!
Hi!
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 06:45:30PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote
> Getting needed keys from a keyserver is completely a function of
> your pgp/gpg program... the keyserver line is all that's needed if
> you're using gpg. (Well, it works for verifying sigs anyway... I've
Fine, but IIRC that on
> Well, I think mines longest so far but like Knute I downloaded and then
> modified. (That's kinda like an artificial extension or implants: Just
> as impressive visually but we all know they're fake!)
> Weighing in at a whopping 2036 not counting aliases.
I wonder if all the very long .muttrc
80 matches
Mail list logo
