I've noticed that with 1.3.24 with (allow_ansi as yes *or* no), I get
the following on PGP signed messages in the pager:
[-- End of PGP output --]
\012
[-- The following data is signed --]
\012
Is anyone else seeing this? I'm using aterm with TERM set to
xterm-color and have had no
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-24-11 20:17 +0100]:
> Just another quetion:
> Is there a possibility to tell mutt to coose the signature randomly
> out of a directory?
I'll once again plug my approach, which is to use fortune for the
random part of my sig. I don't generally like
Samuel Padgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I always figured that, if it really annoys them, they should switch
> to an MUA that generates a Mail-Followup-To header (like Mutt) or
-or Gnus- :)
> one that handles duplicates really well (like
Thanks for all of your help.
Greg
--
Greg Steele
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg20903/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Jun Liu wrote:
> I figured it out, add one entry
> 'text/html; links %s; needsterminal; nametemplate=%s.html' into
> ~/.mailcap. :)
Also try
text/html; lynx -dump; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html
in ~/.mailcap and
auto_view text/html
in your .muttrc. This way, the
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
> Hi Gary and all,
>
> why didn't I come up with this workaround? I use w3m regularly - I
> hacked my url_handler.sh into calling it when no Netscape is running
> (hardly recently) and as long as Opera refuses to take remote commands
> (al
Hi,
I just switched to Maildir. No mails are lost, but only one mailbox is
not updated. The deleted mails are tagged, an they vanish when I sync
the box. However, they are still in the 'new' subdirectory and
displayed if I re-enter the box.
I translated all boxes with Mutt. User and mode are inco
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:46:07PM -0800, Owner of many system processes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> > $hide_missing only hides the leading message if they can sensibly be
> > hidden.
>
> sorry... one more thing:
>
> messages that have an asterisk (ie mutt is guessing
Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Samuel Padgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > But won't people who aren't subscribed to the lists not receive your
> > messages?
>
> A rare special case, especially since the majority of the lists I'm
> on don't even allow external posts.
I subscr
Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
>
> $hide_missing only hides the leading message if they can sensibly be
> hidden.
sorry... one more thing:
messages that have an asterisk (ie mutt is guessing based on subject
line or whatever) seem to be showing up with a '?' after the asterisk,
even in a thread that's
Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 15:09:36 -0500, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> > I had a patch that added a $narrow_tree variable years ago, which
> > made the thread tree take up only half as much screen real estate.
> > Maybe it's time to resurrect this too.
>
> Yes, I updated it to
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:54:33PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:40:36PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:23:51AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > > Could you automate it? Could you find o
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:40:36PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:23:51AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Could you automate it? Could you find out whether there are more
> > than, say, 3 URLs in a message body s
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 15:09:36 -0500, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> I had a patch that added a $narrow_tree variable years ago, which made
> the thread tree take up only half as much screen real estate. Maybe
> it's time to resurrect this too.
Yes, I updated it to apply it to the latest Mutt versio
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:23:51AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Display-hooks let you set w3m as the pager for just those messages that
> > you know have a lot of embedded URLs, e.g.,
> >
> > display-hook ~A
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:32:19PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 23:21:27 -0800, Dairy Wall Limey wrote:
> > hrmm this makes sense... setting this does change the number of '?'s...
> > putting:
> > set hide_missing
> >
> > gives one question mark,
>
On 011130, at 07:34:02, Thomas Roessler wrote
> - There's a $wrapmargin variable which gives users some control over
> mutt's wrapping in the pager, and in the text/plain; format=flowed
> handler. The default value of this variable is 0.
If $markers is set and $wrapmargin is set to a value
Hi Gary and all,
why didn't I come up with this workaround? I use w3m regularly - I
hacked my url_handler.sh into calling it when no Netscape is running
(hardly recently) and as long as Opera refuses to take remote commands
(although it says it understands them, Opera 5 and Opera 6 TP1 don't).
T
According to Sven Guckes on Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:56:11PM +0100:
> * Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011130 14:14]:
> > > At first it sounds good, but what happens if I want to change
> > > to an IMAP folder? Prepending "=" obviously doesn't work.
> > Then just have a .muttrc option like
> > Set
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:15:08PM +0100, Cristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mutt folks,
>
> (this idea is for the Mutt developers but since the thread came up
> here, I'm continuing here. Btw. -- sorry for my recent duplicate post.
> It won't happen again, folder-hook works for me now.)
>
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:15:08PM +0100, Cristian wrote:
> There is another great use for an (optional) cursor in the internal
> pager -- you could avoid using the urlview ripper.
>
> The only feature I miss in Mutt compared to Pine 4 is just this:
> Within the ususal message view, you use up a
Moin,
* Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 19:00]:
>* S. William Schulz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:16:47PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
>> > > I'll wait for a perl copy, but I'm interested, too.
>> I'll take mine in ruby please
>Initial perl version at:
>
>ht
Hi,
I want to attach an encrypted mail to another mail, taken from my
$record. The attachement only contains the header though. MIME-forward
doesn't work either, same result.
What am I missing here?
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve
* S. William Schulz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:16:47PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
> >
> > I don't know, David ;)
> >
> > > > It's written in Ruby (http://www.ruby-lang.org/), but I can do a
> > > > Perl version if anyone really doesn't want to install Ruby.
> > >
> > >
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011130 14:14]:
> > At first it sounds good, but what happens if I want to change
> > to an IMAP folder? Prepending "=" obviously doesn't work.
> Then just have a .muttrc option like
> Set enable_default_folder="yes"
> for those that do not care about imap
and how
I figured it out, add one entry
'text/html; links %s; needsterminal; nametemplate=%s.html' into
~/.mailcap. :)
/Jun
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:25:41PM +0100, Jun Liu wrote:
:Hi, all,
:
:I was just wondering how to view emails in html format by using links or
:lynx.
:
:Thanks, :)
:
:/Jun
Hi, all,
I was just wondering how to view emails in html format by using links or
lynx.
Thanks, :)
/Jun
Thomas Roessler [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
And I've just updated the web site to this version, since it is a public
beta.
I've updated the official release areas (news, changes, manual, etc.)
already, and I'll update the user-contributed
Thus spake Matej Cepl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> My mutt does not automagically attach attachements of the original
> message being forwarded. What option does control this behavior?
Have a look at mime_forward. I use this:
message-hook . "set mime_forward=no"
message-hook "~h mul
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 15:52:09 +, Bruno Postle wrote:
> On Fri 30-Nov-2001 at 01:09:20PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> > If I get a pgp/gpg message I now get
> >
> > > [-- End of PGP output --]
> > > \012
> > > [-- The following data is signed --]
> > > \012
>
> I get ? instead of \012
I
My mutt does not automagically attach attachements of the
original message being forwarded. What option does control this
behavior?
TIA
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488
They that can give up essential l
On Fri 30-Nov-2001 at 01:09:20PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> If I get a pgp/gpg message I now get
>
> > [-- End of PGP output --]
> > \012
> > [-- The following data is signed --]
> > \012
I get ? instead of \012
This is the same without any color settings so there is an extra
formfeed charac
1) How can I refresh the current inbox? The 'G' key seems to be
POP-specific (I'm using IMAP).
2) Can I set up vim to place the cursor in the "To" field automatically
when composing a message?
Thanks again,
Paul
1) When I start mutt, I see this message:
fcntl: No locks available (errno = 37)
How can I make it go away?
2) When I go to the index, I see this message:
/home/pbrannan/.mh_profile not found, mh format names disabled
How can I make it go away?
3) When changing between mailboxes,
Thus spake Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> René already told you one way to do it, but I thought I'd share my way
> of doing it, as well. So, I've created symbolic link inbox in my
> maildir, which points to mail spool. I find it quite convenient and
> clear. YMMV.
I do this as well. All o
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:16:47PM +0100, René Clerc wrote:
>
> I don't know, David ;)
>
> | % It's written in Ruby (http://www.ruby-lang.org/), but I can do a Perl
> | % version if anyone really doesn't want to install Ruby.
> |
> | I'll wait for a perl copy, but I'm interested, too.
I'll ta
Hi,
* Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 16:08]:
>I wouldn't mind if mutt scanned the thread for Mail-Followup-To: headers
>and Cc:'d anyone who had it set to their address explicitly. If people
>off-list do this then, they get the message, but people on the list
>don't get dupes.
It doe
Hi,
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 16:11]:
>% It's written in Ruby (http://www.ruby-lang.org/), but I can do a Perl
>% version if anyone really doesn't want to install Ruby.
>I'll wait for a perl copy, but I'm interested, too.
No. Please don't.
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essen
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 16:14]:
| Thomas --
|
| ...and then Thomas Hurst said...
| % This isn't entirely mutt related, but I'm sure some of you will be
| % interested.
| %
| % I just finished (for tonight :) tweaking a script designed to rebuild
| % quote strings with the On
Hi Mutt folks,
(this idea is for the Mutt developers but since the thread came up
here, I'm continuing here. Btw. -- sorry for my recent duplicate post.
It won't happen again, folder-hook works for me now.)
There is another great use for an (optional) cursor in the internal
pager -- you could av
Thomas Hurst wrote:
>
> I wouldn't mind if mutt scanned the thread for Mail-Followup-To:
> headers and Cc:'d anyone who had it set to their address explicitly.
> If people off-list do this then, they get the message, but people on
> the list don't get dupes.
i'm confused , and all already
Thomas --
...and then Thomas Hurst said...
% This isn't entirely mutt related, but I'm sure some of you will be
% interested.
%
% I just finished (for tonight :) tweaking a script designed to rebuild
% quote strings with the One True Quote String ('> ', obviously), even if
% you're replying to s
* Dairy Wall Limey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thomas Hurst wrote:
> > * Samuel Padgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > But won't people who aren't subscribed to the lists not receive
> > > your messages?
> >
> > A rare special case, especially since the majority of the lists I'm
> > on don't e
* Paul Roberts Student lab engineer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 15:17]:
| On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:03:30AM -0800, Dairy Wall Limey wrote:
|
| > if you have "folder" set correctly it should, no?
| > if i understand it correctly, = just means 'a known mailbox' so if your
| > imap 'folder' is
* Dairy Wall Limey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 15:05]:
| Ren? Clerc wrote:
| > * Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 13:47]:
| >
| > | macro index c =
| > | But then you lose the (partially useful) functionality of the
| > | last active folder being offered by mutt as the default.
|
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:03:30AM -0800, Dairy Wall Limey wrote:
> if you have "folder" set correctly it should, no?
> if i understand it correctly, = just means 'a known mailbox' so if your
> imap 'folder' is set in $folder, and you have it listed as a mailbox,
> using = should work the same as
According to René Clerc on Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:00:10PM +0100:
> * Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 13:47]:
>
> | I believe that mutt should automatically prepend the value of
> | the set-folder variable to whatever the user enters as the
> | destination folder when issuing the chan
Ren? Clerc wrote:
> * Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 13:47]:
>
> | macro index c =
> | But then you lose the (partially useful) functionality of the
> | last active folder being offered by mutt as the default.
> |
> | Is there something wrong with this proposal?
>
> At first it sou
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 13:47]:
| I believe that mutt should automatically prepend the value of
| the set-folder variable to whatever the user enters as the
| destination folder when issuing the change-folder command
| (bound by default to 'c').
|
| To get round this I have
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 Lars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
>
> Signing list email is a complete useless exercise and wastes my time
> if your key is not on any key servers (and yes, I tried several, just
> in case).
Am a bit new to the whole concept of encryption, so I apologize
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 23:21:27 -0800, Dairy Wall Limey wrote:
> hrmm this makes sense... setting this does change the number of '?'s...
> putting:
> set hide_missing
>
> gives one question mark,
Here, I get several question marks ($hide_missing set). :(
> is there a way to hide the question m
Hi,
* Prahlad Vaidyanathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 13:08]:
>send-hook ~l set pgp_autosign=yes
Could you give me the motivation for this? Off-list, if you like,
because I'm sure this comes up twice a year.
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
tempor
If I get a pgp/gpg message I now get
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: 11/30/01 13:08:07) --]
> gpg: Signature made 11/30/01 12:08:21 GMT using DSA key ID 2125BB86
> gpg: requesting key 2125BB86 from wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net ...
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Can't check signature: pu
Hi,
Quoting from the mutt manual:
mailbox shortcuts can be used anywhere where a path to a mailbox is needed
· ! -- refers to your ``$spool'' (incoming) mailbox
· > -- refers to your ``$mbox'' file
· < -- refers to your ``$record'' file
· - or !! -- refers to the file you've last vi
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 Cedric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
>
> Hi Prahlad,
>
> > Any clues as to why this is happening ? This patch could be _very_
> > useful ... if only I can get it to work :-(
>
> this patch is closely tied to the threading code.
Ahhh - that explains it !
>
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 René <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> * Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 11:22]:
>
> | I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. But:
> | Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed?
>
> I do it the
I believe that mutt should automatically prepend the value of
the set-folder variable to whatever the user enters as the
destination folder when issuing the change-folder command
(bound by default to 'c').
To get round this I have lived with mutt being executed from
my mail folder dir - but this
> >So, is it really necessary to create ~/.forward in order to use
> >Procmail, or is it just Exim, who notices if there's Procmail in
> >use?
> I don't know Exim, but it can obviously configured to use an MDA/LDA
> to do the actual delivery. Grep for procmail in Exim's configuration
> files.
You
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:24:36PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=100288683121313&w=2
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev&m=100288714522738&w=2
No that's fine, but shouldn't it be fixed somewhere ... it's been
around for a while ...
Steve
--
N
Steve Kennedy writes:
> SunOS 4.1.4 gcc 2.95.2
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home2/ns/steve/mutt/mutt-1.3.24/imap'
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I/usr/local/include -I../intl
> -Wall -pedantic -O2 -c auth.c
> In file included from ../protos.h:20,
> from
Hi, all,
Just found out that procmail doesn't need .forward in mandrake8.1.
Everything just works if you write .procmailrc correctly.
Later I would like to try maildrop, :)
Thanks for you all,
/Jun
Signing list email is a complete useless exercise and wastes my time
if your key is not on any key servers (and yes, I tried several, just
in case).
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri 30 Nov 2001 12:14:19 PM GMT) --]
gpg: Signature made Fri Nov 30 08:04:08 2001 GMT using DSA key ID 212
SunOS 4.1.4 gcc 2.95.2
make[2]: Entering directory `/home2/ns/steve/mutt/mutt-1.3.24/imap'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../intl -I/usr/local/include -I../intl
-Wall -pedantic -O2 -c auth.c
In file included from ../protos.h:20,
from ../mutt.h:809,
fro
Hi,
* Dairy Wall Limey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 12:47]:
>with postfix (if mailbox_command isn't set to procmail -t) you don't
>need a fancy sendmail style .forward i just use:
>
>zugzug% cat .forward
>"| /usr/bin/procmail -t"
Use
"| /usr/bin/procmail -t || exit 75"
if you want Po
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 Jun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
> Hi, all,
>
> This probably sounds stupid but I really get stuck here. I don't know
> how to setup filters to organize different mailing list into different
> folder, just like pine does.
As everyone else seems to have poin
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001 Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed into the ether:
[-- snip --]
> It's written in Ruby (http://www.ruby-lang.org/), but I can do a Perl
> version if anyone really doesn't want to install Ruby.
Well, it seems like a great idea :-)
If and when you finish the perl script, d
Hi,
* Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 12:40]:
>Just out of curiosity; I'm using Exim as MTA and Mutt (of course)
>as MUA. Procmail filters incoming mail into different mailboxes
>and kills spam from known addresses. Still, I haven't set up
>~/.forward.
>So, is it really necessary to c
Jussi Ekholm wrote:
>
> So, is it really necessary to create ~/.forward in order to use
> Procmail, or is it just Exim, who notices if there's Procmail in use?
if exim uses procmail as its LDA, no .forward is needed - your
.procmailrc is read already. since you don't need a .forward, my guess
i
Hi,
* Jun Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 12:12]:
>I use procmail to filter those incoming email into different mailboxes,
>but I don't know how to get into these mailboxes. Mutt only gives me the
>/var/spool/mail/lxj.
Set them:
mailboxes `find /path/to/your/directory/of/mailboxes -typ
Cristian Pietsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Techies use procmail for this task. First you have to tell your Mail
> Transport Agent to let procmail deliver your mail. You do this by
> creating a file called ~/.forward containing this line:
> "| exec procmail -f- "
Just out of curiosity; I'm usi
Greg Steele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I start mutt I see the contents of /var/spool/.
> I change folders using 'c' command. I cannot figure out how to
> get back to view /var/spool/.
*Please*, do not write lines longer than 76 characters (preferably
72 characters) - makes replying a p
* Jun Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 12:14]:
| I use procmail to filter those incoming email into different mailboxes,
| but I don't know how to get into these mailboxes. Mutt only gives me the
| /var/spool/mail/lxj.
Check out the "mailboxes" directive. This directive tells mutt which
mail
Hi, all,
I use procmail to filter those incoming email into different mailboxes,
but I don't know how to get into these mailboxes. Mutt only gives me the
/var/spool/mail/lxj.
Thanks,
/Jun
Moin,
* Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 11:20]:
>I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg.
Questionable at best, but completly useless unless you get your keys
on the server.
>But: Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not
>signed?
Yes, by se
Andreas Selig wrote:
> wasn't correct . I already read in the mailinglist several threads but
> nothing helped:
> I tryed : set pgp_good_sign="gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von"
set pgp_good_sign="^gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von" works fine here
* Markus Boelter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-11-2001 11:22]:
| I'm using mutt and gpg. I want to sign each message with gpg. But:
| Is it possible to exclude some persons which get mails are not signed?
I do it the other way around: by default, I don't sign any message.
And then define persons to wh
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 09:20:06AM +0530, Prahlad Vaidyanathan wrote:
> In Vim,
in vi
>
> :g/^$/d
--
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
Hi Jun,
my Pine manual says that it's a bad idea to use Pine or any other
email client for this purpose. It's funny that nevertheless Pine 4
offers this kind of service.
Techies use procmail for this task. First you have to tell your Mail
Transport Agent to let procmail deliver your mail. You do
msg.pgp
Description: PGP message
Moin,
* Cristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 00:29]:
>I just noticed that somebody suggested Maildrop. It may be wise to
>look at Maildrop first -- I surmise it is easier to use. Procmail,
>on the other hand, is very powerful and the de-facto standard in this
>area.
I used Procmail for two year
Hi,
* Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 00:21]:
>* Thorsten Haude ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Yeah, the basic brain-dead-mailer-problem and its reply-to-munging or
>> group-reply answer. Fortunately, there's Mutt. I use group-reply about
>> once a year.
>I have 'r' rebound to list-repl
Hi all!
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> I've just released the next mutt beta, version 1.3.24i.
>
> Some of the more interesting changes against mutt-1.3.23i:
Just a question: are you also announcing to mutt-annunce?
I've subscribed it, but never read any announcments...
Ciao fo
82 matches
Mail list logo
