On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 03:54:33PM -0500, Dan Boger wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:40:36PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Cristian wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 10:23:51AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: > > > Could you automate it? Could you find out whether there are more > > > than, say, 3 URLs in a message body so it's worth to hand over control > > > to w3m? Can you do it without slowing down the whole Mutt? > > > > I don't think so. The problem is that you would have to use an external > > program to count the URLs and mutt doesn't send the message text to any > > external program (e.g., "display_filter" or "pager") until it has > > decided which pager it is going to use. An external pager wrapper > > program could select among a set of external pagers, but it couldn't > > select mutt's internal pager. > > what if you set up a procmail filter, to add a header to messages with 3 > or more urls, and then have mutt match that header? would that work?
Yes, I think that would work. Gary -- Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Spokane, Washington, USA http://www.spocom.com/users/gjohnson/mutt/ |