* Dairy Wall Limey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Thomas Hurst wrote: > > * Samuel Padgett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > But won't people who aren't subscribed to the lists not receive > > > your messages? > > > > A rare special case, especially since the majority of the lists I'm > > on don't even allow external posts. I'd rather one person with > > questionable reasons posting to the list not receive a message than > > 4 people receive two each. > > this is why i think it would be cool if there was a feature (or patch) > to allow you to do something like: > > if(a valid list); bind 'r' or 'R' to 'ask-yes list reply' > > ie if the message comes from a known or subscribed list, and you hit > <reply> or <group-reply>, mutt would say: reply to list y,n
I wouldn't mind if mutt scanned the thread for Mail-Followup-To: headers and Cc:'d anyone who had it set to their address explicitly. If people off-list do this then, they get the message, but people on the list don't get dupes. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.aagh.net/
