Hi,
* Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-30 00:21]:
>* Thorsten Haude ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Yeah, the basic brain-dead-mailer-problem and its reply-to-munging or
>> group-reply answer. Fortunately, there's Mutt. I use group-reply about
>> once a year.
>I have 'r' rebound to list-reply for all my mailing lists (bar one
>broken one). Nice having a MUA this flexible, means all the lists that
>use (or don't use) Reply-To: act the same :)
I thought about this, but I answer individually too often. I'd rather
make my filter weed out Reply-Tos in known offenders.
>> Dairy, you could set the Reply-To header, this is more widely honored
>> than Mail-Followup-To. Ah. I guess they would hit group-reply anyway.
>It would be nice to, in addition to the option to set Mail-Followup-To,
>to be able to set Reply-To: to the list address automatically. Anything
>that helps cut down the dupes is Good[tm]..
See my other mail.
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
