> It doesn't look like mutt actually needs anything IN the file to know
> something is new. Only the access and the creation times maintained by
OK. for mutt to know what a mail is new/old maybe it is not needed to
maintain any special data. But what about other mail attributes: mail
read, mail
On 08/10/01 12:42 AM, Christian Ordig sat at the `puter and typed:
> > > ok ... might be quite slow, I never relly realized this because I have a
> > > quite fast connection ... so I am really happy with this. But I can
> > > believe having a modem and no local NNTPd might be a pain. I used leafno
* Will Yadley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010807 19:38]:
change this line
> print "\033]0;$line\007]";
to this:
print "\033]0;$line\007";
? It's entirely untested, but my first impulse on looking at it was "why
is there an extra right-bracket there?"
--
Vineet http
I'm not sure if this is mandatory or not, but my folder hooks have
single quotes around the whole argument, like:
folder-hook Sent 'set index_format="%3C %Z %[%b %d %H:%M] - %-22.22t
(%3l) %s"'
Try this out and see if it makes a difference.
Kyle
* Chris S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010809 20:05]:
>
* R. Leponce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010808 09:49]:
> Hello all,
>
> just a simple question: I always have my $EDITOR variable set to vim, so I
> wanted to try the builtin editor of Mutt. I unset this variable (and
> also $VISUAL), and evenis vi is not mentionned in my .muttrc, vi stays the
> defaul
* Chris S. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010809 17:06]:
>
>
> Is there something wrong with this?
>
> folder-hook . set index_format="%2C %-20.20L %-33.33s %(%b %d %I:%M%p)"
>
> folder-hook IN.Seawolf-List set index_format="%2C %Z %-20.20L %-33.33s"
> folder-hook IN.Procmail set index_format="%2C
msg.pgp
> > ok ... might be quite slow, I never relly realized this because I have a
> > quite fast connection ... so I am really happy with this. But I can
> > believe having a modem and no local NNTPd might be a pain. I used leafnode
> > the days I still had a modem ... maybe this helps ;-))
> >
> No,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
> I am a newbie and probably this is a FAQ. Would you excuse me and my
> poor english. I know Mutt is able to fetch mail from various POP
> accounts, without "fetchmail" but I don't know how modify my ".muttrc"
> file to do this.
> I added new lines for every accont wi
Hello,
I just replied to a message on this list and mutt saw fit to
add a space between the Re: and the rest of the subject line.
I've accidentally sent one of these messages out before and
have been meaning to fix it except I can't seem to find out
what controls this in the manual.
Thanks for
on Thu,09 Aug 2001, David T-G wrote:
> % I always thought that these mailbox files are just plane and simple
> % text files, that contain only the email, one after the other; and
>
> mbox-format files are just that; the status indicator you seek is
> X-Status: and if there isn't one mutt assumes
> The script sounds like a handy one; I can even see how it might lay out.
> Write it and submit it! :-)
:-
> mbox-format files are just that; the status indicator you seek is
> X-Status: and if there isn't one mutt assumes the mail is new.
I have sent a few email-s to myself and palyed wit
I have a few save-hooks set up to save my mailing list stuff into
different folders. However, I'd like to set up a default save-hook that
would save anything that is not caught by the other save-hooks into
another directory according to the From: address. Example: if I have
mail from [EMAIL PROTEC
I use quite a few fcc-save-hooks (in mutt v1.2.5), and I've noticed
something which makes them almost useless now. The Fcc: seems to be set
according to the first sequential address match. This would be fine if
mutt compared the fcc-save-hook to the To: field first, but it seems to
consider the To
Will Yadley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 08/09/2001:
> The only way I can seem to get my file browser to disply my
> folders in the order i have them listed (as 'mailboxes) is to
> do: set sort_browser=unsorted
>
> this is great except when i hit 'tab' key, the directories
Kyle Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 08/08/2001:
> I've finally figured out that 'reverse_name' isn't working because my
> alternates line isn't matching properly. I have it written as:
> set alternates =
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL P
Atiz --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% > like new mail (which comes with elm), and other mail checkers such as biff
% > or xbiff. You must figure out what's checking your folders and stop it.
%
% Ha! I found the little devil... and killed him! :-)
*grin*
% New mail indicator is work
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Nate Johnston wrote:
> All,
>
> I apologize if this has been discussed and I missed it, but I recently
> upgraded to 1.3.19i. When I did so, the "default" color seems to have
> disappeared. I get about 20 of these errors:
>
> Error in /home/nate/.muttrc, line 243: default: n
All,
I apologize if this has been discussed and I missed it, but I recently
upgraded to 1.3.19i. When I did so, the "default" color seems to have
disappeared. I get about 20 of these errors:
Error in /home/nate/.muttrc, line 243: default: no such color
What should I replace this with? If I c
> like new mail (which comes with elm), and other mail checkers such as biff
> or xbiff. You must figure out what's checking your folders and stop it.
Ha! I found the little devil... and killed him! :-)
New mail indicator is working fine now.
> Are you only interested in new mail in your spool
Atiz --
First, you should include the list in your reply. You're much more
likely to get an answer than if you send only to one person -- and, since
the person in question is I and I have been terribly busy and away from
the list, this reply is, in fact, a stroke of luck :-)
...and then [EMAIL
hello,
has someone tried procmailrc when you use the pop functionnality of mutt?
mutt fetches all my mail in /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME
I made a .forward and .procmailrc
checked the permissions of these files
I made a small test so if I sent a mail with test in the subject it should go to the
t
The only way I can seem to get my file browser to disply my folders in the order i
have them listed (as 'mailboxes) is to do:
set sort_browser=unsorted
this is great except when i hit 'tab' key, the directories (maildir) are
completely unsorted. They don't seem to be sorted quite alphabetically
23 matches
Mail list logo
