Aaron --
...and then Aaron Lehmann said...
% On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:32:31AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
% > Hi Aaron!
% >
% > On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
% > weasel@marvin:~$ grep mailboxes .mutt/muttrc
% > mailboxes /var/spool/mail/weasel `echo
$HOME/.Mail/{IN,People*,Proj
Nollaig, et al --
...and then Nollaig MacKenzie said...
%
% On 2000.10.10 21:45:14, you,
% the extraordinary Mikko Hänninen, opined:
He is, indeed :-)
%
% > Nollaig MacKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 10 Oct 2000:
% > > Am I right in thinking that the message Bcc-ed to
...
% >
% >
rex --
...and then rex said...
% On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:14:24AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% >
% >> encrypted with someone else's public key and I can't decrypt and read my
% >> own sent mail.
% >
% > Well, then, you should simply encrypt to your key as well :-)
%
% If you contemplate EVER us
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 09:23:29AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example
> >
> > $ ps ax | grep lemming
> > 16004 tty1 S 0:00 grep lemming
> >
> > Y'see? Grep makes a match on its own process.
>
> It
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:32:31AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi Aaron!
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> weasel@marvin:~$ grep mailboxes .mutt/muttrc
> mailboxes /var/spool/mail/weasel `echo
>$HOME/.Mail/{IN,People*,Projects*,Debian*,Maillists*,Newsletters*,Cron*,Errors*,spa
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:38:31PM -0700 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Bruce J.A. Nourish thought:
> > if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt > /dev/null
>
> Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example
>
> $ ps ax | grep lemming
> 16004 tty1 S 0:00 grep lemming
>
Jamie Novak wrote:
> On 10/11, Aaron Schrab rearranged the electrons to read:
>
> > Or you could just make a minor modification to the grep pattern:
> >
> > ps -U $LOGNAME | grep 'r[e]almutt' > /dev/null
> >
> > That way grep won't be able to match itself.
>
> You could also just do a:
>
>
Hi Aaron!
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> At 09:23 +0930 12 Oct 2000, Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:38:31PM -0700, Bruce J.A. Nourish wrote:
> > > > if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt > /dev/null
> > >
> > > Be careful about using grep to
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 07:17:35PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> At 09:23 +0930 12 Oct 2000, Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:38:31PM -0700, Bruce J.A. Nourish wrote:
> > > > if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt > /dev/null
> > >
> > > Be careful about usin
On 10/11, Aaron Schrab rearranged the electrons to read:
> Or you could just make a minor modification to the grep pattern:
>
> ps -U $LOGNAME | grep 'r[e]almutt' > /dev/null
>
> That way grep won't be able to match itself.
You could also just do a:
ps -U $LOGONAME | grep mutt | grep -v gre
Hi Aaron!
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> I'm subscribed to many mailing lists and I love the idea of mutt
> telling me which mailboxes have new mail. However, that would make the
> mailboxes line be yet another list of subscriptions that I would have
> to keep up to date. What I rea
At 09:23 +0930 12 Oct 2000, Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:38:31PM -0700, Bruce J.A. Nourish wrote:
> > > if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt > /dev/null
> >
> > Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example
> >
> > $ ps ax | grep l
Hi,
I'm subscribed to many mailing lists and I love the idea of mutt
telling me which mailboxes have new mail. However, that would make the
mailboxes line be yet another list of subscriptions that I would have
to keep up to date. What I really want to do is something like:
mailboxes ! =*
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:38:31PM -0700, Bruce J.A. Nourish wrote:
> > if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt > /dev/null
>
> Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example
>
> $ ps ax | grep lemming
> 16004 tty1 S 0:00 grep lemming
>
> Y'see? Grep makes a match on it
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 01:01:41PM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
> set alternates =
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|dboger@.*.bgu.ac.il
Just a note on your alternates regex... its rather wordy. Try:
set alternates =
"dan@((
> if ps -U $LOGNAME | grep realmutt > /dev/null
Be careful about using grep to search the output of ps. For example
$ ps ax | grep lemming
16004 tty1 S 0:00 grep lemming
Y'see? Grep makes a match on its own process.
--
[ Bruce J.A. Nourish (email and finger) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
On 2000.10.11 13:19:22, you,
the extraordinary raf, opined:
> Nollaig MacKenzie wrote:
>
> >
> > Am I right in thinking that the message Bcc-ed to
> > myself is encrypted quite independently of the
> > message "To: " whoever (and vice-versa, which is
> > what actually matters
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 08:19:24PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> the/eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 11 Oct 2000:
> > I could use a shell script to `ps' for existing
> > mutt sessions before launching another session;
> > or is there a better way?
>
> How about a shell script that look
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 03:33:06PM -0500 or thereabouts, the/eXtreme wrote:
> -: You'll notice the previous post includes the line
> -:
> -: touch $LOCKFILE
>
> Yes, silly of me. It also helps if the luser starts
> the *first* mutt session using the script. Duh.
Time of day, Time of day...
--
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:44:56PM -0400, Jean-Paul Laberge wrote:
> I'd like to know how to use 'mutt' in batch mode, without a user
> intervention. I use the following command:
>
> mutt -a attached.txt -s "Test from MUTT" jplaberge@.aircanada.ca
>
> but I'm always going in the user interface.
Jean-Paul Laberge [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I'd like to know how to use 'mutt' in batch mode, without a user
> intervention. I use the following command:
>
> mutt -a attached.txt -s "Test from MUTT" jplaberge@.aircanada.ca
>
> but I'm always going in the user interface.
Almost right, use:
On 2000.10.11 16:44:56, you,
the extraordinary Jean-Paul Laberge, opined:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know how to use 'mutt' in batch mode, without a user
> intervention. I use the following command:
>
> mutt -a attached.txt -s "Test from MUTT" jplaberge@.aircanada.ca
>
> but I'm always going in
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 04:44:56PM -0400, Jean-Paul Laberge wrote:
> I'd like to know how to use 'mutt' in batch mode, without a user
> intervention. I use the following command:
>
> mutt -a attached.txt -s "Test from MUTT" jplaberge@.aircanada.ca
>
> but I'm always going in the user interface.
Hi,
I'd like to know how to use 'mutt' in batch mode, without a user
intervention. I use the following command:
mutt -a attached.txt -s "Test from MUTT" jplaberge@.aircanada.ca
but I'm always going in the user interface.
Is it possible to do it? And, if yes, do you know how to do it?
Thanks
-: You'll notice the previous post includes the line
-:
-: touch $LOCKFILE
Yes, silly of me. It also helps if the luser starts
the *first* mutt session using the script. Duh.
On 2000-10-11 21:41:38 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
> > > Can mutt use a MSA (mail submission agent)?
> Probably not. MSA (mail submission agent) refers to RFC2476. It specifies
> an interface very similar to SMTP on a different port (587), especially
> intented to allow email submission from MUA
Lutz Jaenicke [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:14:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:57:06AM -0700, Todd Holloway wrote:
> > >
> > > Can mutt use a MSA (mail submission agent)?
> >
> > Of course. Now, mutt invokes sendmail -- I see no reason
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:30:07PM -0500 or thereabouts, the/eXtreme wrote:
> -: LOCKFILE=~/.mutt.lock
>
> Does a lock file exist for IMAP-configured mutt? When I
> have a mutt session up, I can't find a lock file anywhere.
>
> Do I need to be concerned with the `dotlock_program'
> configuratio
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:14:14PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:57:06AM -0700, Todd Holloway wrote:
> >
> > Can mutt use a MSA (mail submission agent)?
>
> Of course. Now, mutt invokes sendmail -- I see no reason why it shouldn't be
> able to call an MSA instead. Y
-: LOCKFILE=~/.mutt.lock
Does a lock file exist for IMAP-configured mutt? When I
have a mutt session up, I can't find a lock file anywhere.
Do I need to be concerned with the `dotlock_program'
configuration variable? My configuration and build
of mutt-1.2.5 didn't create a `mutt_dotlock' binar
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:57:06AM -0700, Todd Holloway wrote:
>
> Can mutt use a MSA (mail submission agent)?
Of course. Now, mutt invokes sendmail -- I see no reason why it shouldn't be
able to call an MSA instead. You can even specify HOW mutt should call
sendmail /qmail, whatever)
--
[EMAI
Can mutt use a MSA (mail submission agent)?
If not are there currently plans to or should
I submit a feature request (and if so how to I
properly submit a feature request)?
thanks,
Todd "Pier" Holloway
--
Have a happy mind...
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 08:16:15PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Are you using "my_hdr From", perhaps? "my_hdr From" is incompatible
> (sort of) with $reverse_name.
sure enough, that was it. Once I changed from
send-hook . 'my_hdr From...'
to
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From'
it works :) Thank
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:49:40AM -0500, the/eXtreme wrote:
> Hey, sometimes I shell out of a mutt window,
> forget where I am (easy, when you're me),
> and start another mutt session. Days can go
> by before I catch the duplicated sessions.
>
> I could use a shell script to `ps' for existing
>
the/eXtreme proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I could use a shell script to `ps' for existing
> mutt sessions before launching another session;
> or is there a better way?
That is the best way ;)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel
the/eXtreme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 11 Oct 2000:
> I could use a shell script to `ps' for existing
> mutt sessions before launching another session;
> or is there a better way?
How about a shell script that looks (vaguely) like this:
#!/bin/sh
LOCKFILE=~/.mutt.lock
if [ -f $LOCKFILE ];
Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 11 Oct 2000:
> and yet, when I get mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and try to reply to it, the reply
> has the default of [EMAIL PROTECTED] what am I missing?
Are you using "my_hdr From", perhaps? "my_hdr From" is incompatible
(sort of) with $reverse_name.
what am I doing wrong?
I have the following set:
set alternates =
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|dboger@.*.bgu.ac.il
set reverse_name
and yet, when I get mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and try to reply to it, the reply
ha
Hey, sometimes I shell out of a mutt window,
forget where I am (easy, when you're me),
and start another mutt session. Days can go
by before I catch the duplicated sessions.
I could use a shell script to `ps' for existing
mutt sessions before launching another session;
or is there a better way?
Hi there
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:38:40PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
AS> What is the '--textmode' for? The (gpg) manual page gives an explanation
AS> for '-t' but not really for '--textmode'.
> -t and --textmode are roughly equivalent, as stated in my man page
> (v1.03).
>
> -t, --textmode
>
Hi.
I've change a function a little. Now it takes only name of recipient (if it's
there) and its address otherwise. If there are multiple recipients in To:
field, it takes only first one (the title string can be too long).
function M_settitle()
let i = 1
let line = getline(i)
while (
According to Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on 10/10/00):
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 01:39:51PM +0200, Marc de Courville wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > please find attached to this email the new version of mutt_ldap_query
> > perl script that performs ldap queries for mutt.
> > The distribut
On 10, Oct, 2000 at 04:04:13PM -0700, Peter Jaques wrote:
> has anyone gotten muttzilla working on freebsd? when i click a mailto link
> now, nothing at all happens, not even console complaints from netscape.
On OpenBSD I couldn't make it compile at all, so ... you're better of I
think, but I'd s
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 11:29:30PM +0200, Horacio MG wrote:
> > hmmm ...
> >
> > i've had problems with this when mutt was using the wrong sendmail
> > binary (= or i've forgotten to replace the OEM sendmail with a link to
> > qmail's sendmail binary. make sure that /usr/sbin/sendmail is a link
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
