Hi,
I just looked at the message sent from "fman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" to
this list (Subject: Re: Reply to all???).
fman included a gpg public key as his(?) signature. Whilst I
_suspect_ this might breach the acceptable number of line for a .sig,
the stranger thing is that when I viewed the mes
Because it's simple yet non-intutive?
I would think that if 'r' is reply then 'R' should be group reply because
it's the greater reply. This is very comon function people use often and it
suprises them when it fails to work. The suprise is what makes it a FAQ
item. Something you expect to be
it worked when I tried it. I press g and it automically had your email and the user
list
--
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
mQGiBDlYQxYRBACHDSw/JNcmvvZeQQMKq954FHbiyJHyNZ+clwwdFPzIOsxiq3AW
r5T1Xk2mPYqF8cQEqUQME8jH
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 07:07:47PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
:On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 06:23:04PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
:>
:> How would I go about replying to all
:
:Use 'g':
:
:group-replyreply to all recipients
Mutt's group-reply is not the same thing as "reply to
> How would I go about replying to all
Why the heck is this becoming a FAQ? Doesn't anyone RTFM anymore?
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-+-+--
the crises posed a question / just
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 05:32:45PM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
-> On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:47:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
-> [snip]
-> >
-> > I plan to model the planned mutt for dummies [1] on this page.
-> >
-> > [1] better not call it that - comdex/idg attorneys will chew my ass of
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 06:23:04PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
> How would I go about replying to all
Use 'g':
group-replyreply to all recipients
Gary
--
Gary Johnson | Agilent Technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RF Communications Product Generation
When I try to open an email in html I receive the following:
[dlm@dhcp232 dlm]$ mutt
sh: syntax error near unexpected token `openURL(''
sh: -c: line 1: `netscape -remote openURL('/tmp/muttnbn5pN')'
Press any key to continue...
Press any key to continue...
sh: syntax error near unexpected token `o
Yeah, I was to implement PGP/GPG in my company and we have come to
conclusion that for Linux users (20 of us) we use GPG and for Windows
(100 of them) use PGP coz that has got a GUI of some sort.. Now, none of
the Windows box can read our signature, be in traditional or not..
Windows somehow needs
How would I go about replying to all
--
Jason G Helfman
Network Administrator
BizRate.com
Fingerprint: 0B79 2B17 98CF 2347 CF90 7B50 E11C 587C 5560 21CC
GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1024D/556021CC
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 11:54:18PM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
>
> Threads are usually broken because someone's mailer doeesn't generate
> any useful trackable header like Message-ID, References, or In-Reply-To.
> I would rather get the person to use a better client, or smack her/his
> ISP to add th
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 09:59:30PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> I warn you now - this is more than you asked for.
Yep, it is. ;-)
Thanks anyway.
>
> On 2000.06.17, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Andrew Eichmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the subject line. For example, if the origin
On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 09:58:44PM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Andrew --
>
> I don't have an easy answer for your question, though procmail springs to
> mind for starters. You mentioned searching the manual; did you find
> $reply_regexp and see what you can do with it? It's pretty fancy...
Here
Why not use Eterm???
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 08:26:03PM -0400, Mostly Harmless muttered:
| Is it possible to specify a foreground color as transparent?
| Essentially, I'd like pretty much all my colors as default except for
| indicator which should be reversed: foreground should be bg's default
|
Is it possible to specify a foreground color as transparent?
Essentially, I'd like pretty much all my colors as default except for
indicator which should be reversed: foreground should be bg's default
and vice-versa.
Is this possible?
--
jeremy
... and never, ever play leapfrog with a unicorn.
Ok, this is a bit off-topic, but I still have to ask
somewhere. ;-)
What's the PGP version currently recommended? I don't
seem to be able to find something more recent than some
obscure beta of 6.5.1i, which is likely to still have
certain bugs I already observed in an earlier beta, and
which ar
On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 06:24:54PM -0700, Gottipati Aravind wrote:
> I am using sendmail too. But I dont really know enough about sendmail
> to be messing with sendmail configuration files. But I do know that just
> setting the hostname to cc.usu.edu doesn't do anything to my outgoing
> mails. I h
On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 01:40:34PM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> When using a send-hook i don't know how to tell Mutt it should use the
> settings depending on the folder i'm in. When using a folder-hook it
> seems that the settings get overwritten by send-hooks when actually
> writing the message.
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 03:15:56PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 01:10:34PM -0700, Shane Wegner wrote:
> > -> I am using GPG and a RSA key to encrypt but the message shows up in outlook
> > -> as x.dat as a file attachment and the decrypt option from the PGP menu
>
On Friday, 16 June 2000 at 10:22, Ben Beuchler wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 03:38:54AM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
>
> > If you can reproduce it in your setup, then it's definitely a logic
> > error or some other kind of bug in Mutt. On the other hand, if it
> > varies every time, then it's
Redhat 6.1 Linux
Mutt 1.2i
PGP 6.5.2
I'm trying to get mutt to work with PGP 6.5.2, and I'm
having trouble. I've "source"d the pgp6.rc file in my
.mutt directory, and when I'm finished composing a message
that I'm going to encrypt, I press "p" and the pgp commands
come up - I press "b" for both
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:18:18 -0400 Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 26 June 2000 at 15:21, Phil Chambers wrote:
> > I want to change the file structure used by our IMAP server (UoW 4.7c) but can't
> > do so while we have elm users. The solution seems to be to change those
On Monday, 26 June 2000 at 15:21, Phil Chambers wrote:
> I want to change the file structure used by our IMAP server (UoW 4.7c) but can't
> do so while we have elm users. The solution seems to be to change those users to
> mutt as it looks as if that would be reasonably painless. I would make
On Sat 24-Jun-2000 at 12:50:34PM -0700, Gottipati Aravind wrote:
> My question now is whats the purpose of that hostname variable if it
> does not work?
As far as I can tell, it's the only way of setting the hostname part of
the generated 'Message-ID: ' header.
Bruno
--
http://bruno.postle.ne
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 09:47:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
[snip]
>
> I plan to model the planned mutt for dummies [1] on this page.
>
> [1] better not call it that - comdex/idg attorneys will chew my ass off
> for copyright violations ;)
>
[snap]
come to think of it, name it "mutt
yes, use BitcX
www.BitchX.org
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 12:20:15PM +0200, Antoine Martin muttered:
| On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 10:56:32AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
| > On Monday, 26.06.2000 at 14:35 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
| >
| > > >Apologies for the off-topic post, but I figure Mutt u
Gerhard --
...and then Gerhard den Hollander said...
%
% folder-hook muttusers 'set sort=threads; push '
%
% now when Im reading such a folder, and new mail comes in (which trhoiugh
% the blessings of UUCP comes in batches) it is shown threaded, but with
% threades expanded (not collapsed) ..
I want to change the file structure used by our IMAP server (UoW 4.7c) but can't
do so while we have elm users. The solution seems to be to change those users to
mutt as it looks as if that would be reasonably painless. I would make mutt use
IMAP by putting the following in the /etc/Muttrc fi
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 14:04:52 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 26 Jun 2000:
> > What the difference between 1.2 and 1.2.2 + patches ?
> > or what's the difference between 1.2 and 1.2.3 and when can we expect 1.2.3
> > (being 1.2.2 plus patch
fman proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>What I need to do first it change my reply address in mutt to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>so that I can post to this mailing list.
folder-hook . 'my_hdr Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe)'
>I'm not sure if there is a muttrc file I need to modify or if I have to
>creat
Can some of you mutts out there give me some tips on how to configure mutt?
What I need to do first it change my reply address in mutt to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so that I can post to this mailing list.
I'm not sure if there is a muttrc file I need to modify or if I have to
create a new one.
Joe
- -
Gerhard den Hollander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 26 Jun 2000:
> What the difference between 1.2 and 1.2.2 + patches ?
> or what's the difference between 1.2 and 1.2.3 and when can we expect 1.2.3
> (being 1.2.2 plus patches) ?
1.2.1 was only a build fix to 1.2, because 1.2 failed to build
OK, so the following isn't a bug,a nd I've got a pretty good idea what
causes it, ut it's still weird ..
Ive configured a couple of folders to automatically display in compressed
thread mode (or collapsed thread mode)
e.g.:
folder-hook muttusers 'set sort=threads; push '
now when Im reading s
* clemensF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 02:10:50PM +0200)
> > Lars Hecking:
>
> > Do not ask about the difference between 1.2 and 1.2.1.
> >
> > Use 1.2.2.
>
> but don't forget the patches...
Very clever (really)
but indeed the question remains.
What the difference between 1.2
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 10:56:32AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Monday, 26.06.2000 at 14:35 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> > >Apologies for the off-topic post, but I figure Mutt users might be a good
> > >group of people to make a recommendation.
> > >
> > >I use Mutt and SLRN and am l
On Monday, 26.06.2000 at 14:35 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >Apologies for the off-topic post, but I figure Mutt users might be a good
> >group of people to make a recommendation.
> >
> >I use Mutt and SLRN and am looking for a similarly-configurable
> >(colours etc.) IRC client. Any s
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 09:56:35AM +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> I use Mutt and SLRN and am looking for a similarly-configurable
> (colours etc.) IRC client. Any suggestions?
i use epic with the lice script (nod to keso for the tip). i
recommend it highly. echoes is a lurvely theme.
www.
Dave Ewart proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Apologies for the off-topic post, but I figure Mutt users might be a good
>group of people to make a recommendation.
>
>I use Mutt and SLRN and am looking for a similarly-configurable
>(colours etc.) IRC client. Any suggestions?
xchat
--
Suresh Ramas
Apologies for the off-topic post, but I figure Mutt users might be a good
group of people to make a recommendation.
I use Mutt and SLRN and am looking for a similarly-configurable
(colours etc.) IRC client. Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Ewart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computing Manager
ICRF
39 matches
Mail list logo
