undelete messages

2000-06-24 Thread Vincent Danen
How do I undelete messages? When I try to go back to a deleted message, mutt won't let me... I can't move the arrow onto it. I see on the menu bar at the bottom there is an undelete command, but it looks to work only on the highlighted message (which is never a deleted message because I can neve

Re: Why use set hostname?

2000-06-24 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Gottipati Aravind [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > --- > hostname > >Type: string >Default: "" > >Specifies the hostname to use after the ``@'' in local e-mail > addresses. This overrides >the compile time definiti

Re: [off-topic?] X-PGP- headers (was Re: Suggestion: pgpmimeuser command)

2000-06-24 Thread David T-G
Daniel -- ...and then Daniel González Gasull said... % Hi! :-) % % Myself wrote To Mutt users: % % > list to ask it, but, are there any standard email % > headers to say something like this?: This was the important part of your first post, we note. % > % > X-PGP-Advocacy: Hey, I prefer to r

Re: Suggestion: pgpmimeuser command

2000-06-24 Thread David T-G
Daniel -- My, I'm busy this morning :-) ...and then Daniel González Gasull said... % Hi! :-) % % David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote To Mutt users: % % > You may find everything you wanted for the % > pgpmimeuser setting in v1.2 and up (currently % > 1.2.2 AFAIK), since there is now a clearsig

Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-24 Thread David T-G
Hi again :-) I just thought of a simpler and potentially easier answer to this whole thing. Since you've already stepped up to the work of configuring *your* environment (the aliases file) for these folks who can't get it together, why not just configure your procmail setup to recognize any of t

Re: Suggestion: aka command

2000-06-24 Thread David T-G
Daniel -- ...and then Daniel González Gasull said... % Hello all, and sorry for the delay. I'm in exams. I hope they've gone well! % % David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mutt users: % % > aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] % > % > would automatically readdress any email for % >

Re: Reason to upgrade

2000-06-24 Thread Lars Hecking
Jason Helfman writes: > Is their a reason to upgrade from 1.2 to to 1.2.2 at this point??? Judging from the patches that were posted, we should see 1.2.3 soon. -- Don't let your mind wander -- it's too little to be let out alone.

Re: Why use set hostname?

2000-06-24 Thread Gottipati Aravind
> I'm sure it does work. It works for me. However, your MTA needs to be > configured to leave the hostname alone if it's already present in the email. > I'm using sendmail, which works fine. What are you using? > I am using sendmail too. But I dont really know enough about sendmail to be m

Re: gpg and mutt-1.2.2i

2000-06-24 Thread AG
Hi Thomas! On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Thomas 'Balu' Walter wrote: > Hiho... > I just installed 1.2.2, read the README.UPGRADE and sourced gpg.rc > into my muttrc. > > Being a GPG-newbie I am wondering why it asks me to choose a key from > the following list now: > >1 + 1024/0xBFB1428C DSA -s T

gpg and mutt-1.2.2i

2000-06-24 Thread Thomas 'Balu' Walter
Hiho... I just installed 1.2.2, read the README.UPGRADE and sourced gpg.rc into my muttrc. Being a GPG-newbie I am wondering why it asks me to choose a key from the following list now: 1 + 1024/0xBFB1428C DSA -s Thomas Walter (Balu) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2 + 1024/0xE9AAF668 ElG e- Thomas

Reason to upgrade

2000-06-24 Thread Jason Helfman
Is their a reason to upgrade from 1.2 to to 1.2.2 at this point??? -- /helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always been in your possession." Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A 17D9 9B28 D75E 0A36 GnuPG http://www.gnupg.org Get Private! 1

Re: Why use set hostname?

2000-06-24 Thread clemensF
> Gottipati Aravind: > and that works just fine. My question now is whats the purpose of that > hostname variable if it does not work? am I doing it wrong or do I need > to set some other variable too.. to get it to work? whether you can forge your "from:" line or not depends on the mta. sendma

gpg (was: Re: Sender rejected)

2000-06-24 Thread Michael Tatge
Dennis Robertson muttered: > > I can't seem to get anything to work first time with mutt. I installed gnupg, > copied the gpg.rc file to ~/ and tried to send a signed message to myself. I > get: > Can't open PGP subprocess!: no such file or directory. most likely you forgot to source the file

Re: Question about .Sig

2000-06-24 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Mrinal Kalakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 24 Jun 2000: > Crude hack - put it in attribution: > > set attribution="This\nis\nmy\nmultiline\nsig!\n\n%n wrote:" Less crude, but still a hack: set attribution="\n\n`cat ~/.signature`\n\n%n wrote:" Untested, so please report whether it

Re: Why use set hostname?

2000-06-24 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Gottipati Aravind [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I tried to set the hostname part of my outgoing mails to > "cc.usu.edu" instead of my comps name. I tried it using just plain set > hostname="cc.usu.edu" but that does not do it. My emails still had my > comps name. So I switched to set my_hdr F

Why use set hostname?

2000-06-24 Thread Gottipati Aravind
Hi, I tried to set the hostname part of my outgoing mails to "cc.usu.edu" instead of my comps name. I tried it using just plain set hostname="cc.usu.edu" but that does not do it. My emails still had my comps name. So I switched to set my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. and that works

Re: what hook to use when setting headers depending on current folder?

2000-06-24 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 01:40:34PM +0200, Rejo Zenger wrote: > The setting should be set when i have hit a key (macro?) or when i'm in > a specific folder. When trying the last thing, what should i use? Should > i use a send-hook or a folder-hook? I have tried both and it didn't > work. > > When

Re: mutt with S/MIME anyone done it?

2000-06-24 Thread Bennett Todd
2000-06-22-08:31:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Someone at work has a requirement for a command line MUA to use > with S/MIME. He has to automate sending E-Mail to customers with > X.509 certificates in their mail programs. He says "I think the > RSA BSAFE toolkit is what I need." I've no idea whether

Re: Sender rejected

2000-06-24 Thread David Porter
* Dennis Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I can't seem to get anything to work first time with mutt. I installed > gnupg, copied the gpg.rc file to ~/ and tried to send a signed message to > myself. copy/paste gpg.rc into your .muttrc david -- One's not half two. -- e.e.cummings

Re: Sender rejected

2000-06-24 Thread Dennis Robertson
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 05:33:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Dennis Robertson proclaimed on mutt-users that: > >offending ISP. I apologise for the inconvenience. Configuring gpg is next. > >Regards to all. > > /usr/local/doc/mutt/samples/gpg.rc (also pgp2.rc and pgp5.rc in the sa

Re: 1.2.1

2000-06-24 Thread clemensF
> Lars Hecking: > Do not ask about the difference between 1.2 and 1.2.1. > > Use 1.2.2. but don't forget the patches... clemens

what hook to use when setting headers depending on current folder?

2000-06-24 Thread Rejo Zenger
Hi, I would like to have a few settings (mainly headers, signature, pgp id) which should be dependend on the person i'm writing the message as. The setting should be set when i have hit a key (macro?) or when i'm in a specific folder. When trying the last thing, what should i use? Should i use a