Look at the second part...folder-hooks
study the man on hooks...
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 04:44:14PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
|
| Hello.
|
| On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:26:29PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:40:14PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
|
Hello.
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:26:29PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:40:14PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered:
> | I know how I can make mutt put alternate addresses in the
> | From: line of my email.
>
> Use the my_hdr flag
Yes, that's why I wrote the
Use the my_hdr flag
## .mutt.personal 1.29.00
my_hdr From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Real Name
You can also do hooks for this
folder-hook . "my_hdr From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" # all folders
folder-hook mutt "my_hdr From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" # mutt folder
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:40:
Hi there.
I haven't been lurking on this list at all, but I've searched through
the archives a bit, and I can't find anything that answers this question.
I know how I can make mutt put alternate addresses in the
From: line of my email.
How can I get mutt to recognise messages that are
Timothy --
...and then Timothy Grant said...
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I want to like Mutt but I have a huge number of questions that I haven't
% been able to figure out answers to. All of them have to do with IMAP.
I'm sure we can help you. mutt is very likable :-) I'm no IMAP guy, and
the best fo
Jason --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% I found this in the procmailex man page:
Good enough...
%
...
% :0:
% * meeting
% `date +%y-%m`/meeting
...
% :0 Wic
% * ? test ! -d $MONTHFOLDER
% | mkdir $MON
Jason --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% A call for personal help setting up Gzip compression on mailboxes.
% Utterly confused by the lack of documentation on it
Hokay; I've seen that a few people have pointed you to the docs at
spinnaker, so I won't go there.
At the risk of belabor
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:29:53PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 04 Jun 2000:
> > Ok.. NOW I'm using 1.2. Grr. Compiled 1.2, went to play
> > with my bros on their nintendo, came back and forgot I
> > didn't install :)
>
> And the result of trying to re-crea
I found this in the procmailex man page:
Store all the messages about meetings in a folder that is
in a directory that changes every month. E.g. if it were
January 1994, the folder would have the name `94-01/meet
ing' and the locallockfile would be `94-01/meeting.lock
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 09:52:48PM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> > CaT:
>
> > I'm using several mutts but they're all on a different mailbox.
>
> mailboxes accessed by some nfs? really every mailbox disjunct?
Local filesystem for all mailboxes. and erm.. disjunct?
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> LANGUAGE = (unset),
> LC_ALL = (unset),
> LANG = "koi8-r"
> are supported and installed on your system.
> perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
On Sun, 04 Jun 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A call for personal help setting up Gzip compression on mailboxes.
> Utterly confused by the lack of documentation on it
What kind of documentation are you missing on
http://www.spinnaker.de/mutt/compressed/ ?
Tscho
Roland
--
*
I've already viewed this, patched it and everything, however I still am
not understanding how to do this...
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:32:20PM +0200, Wilhelm Wienemann muttered:
| Hello jgh!
|
| On Sun, 04 Jun 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| > A call for personal help setting up Gzip compres
Hello jgh!
On Sun, 04 Jun 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A call for personal help setting up Gzip compression on mailboxes.
> Utterly confused by the lack of documentation on it
Have a look at
http://www.rhein.de/~roland/mutt/
There you will find an excellent description about
> CaT:
> I'm using several mutts but they're all on a different mailbox.
mailboxes accessed by some nfs? really every mailbox disjunct?
--
clemens
Hi,
I want to like Mutt but I have a huge number of questions that I haven't
been able to figure out answers to. All of them have to do with IMAP.
My mail servers at work are all IMAP. I like being able to keep my mail
on the server and not suck up my own personal disk space. However, I
don't kn
A call for personal help setting up Gzip compression on mailboxes.
Utterly confused by the lack of documentation on it
Please help.
--
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 2F76 2856 776A 3E07 9F3E 452A
* On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 10:06:33AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Alex Lane proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >One last item, my .muttrc has:
> >set charset="koi8-r"
>
> Do you have any other line in your muttrc which overrides this setting?
>
No. Sergei's advice seems to have worke
* On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 12:36:49AM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Here's what you should do:
>
> 1) in your muttrc say "charset=koi8-r" (if you compiled with
> --enable-locales-fix, this will solve the problem right away and you
> don't have to read further. If not, keep reading);
>
> 2) ty
CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 04 Jun 2000:
> Ok.. NOW I'm using 1.2. Grr. Compiled 1.2, went to play
> with my bros on their nintendo, came back and forgot I
> didn't install :)
And the result of trying to re-create the problem with 1.2 is ..?
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu //
Hi ?smund!
On Sun, 04 Jun 2000, ?smund Skj?veland wrote:
> > 6.3.41. fcc_clear
[..]
> Encrypting to myself would be even better. How do I do that?
with pgp 2.6.x: put the following in your ~/.pgp/config.txt:
ENCRYPTTOSELF=on
in gnupg add:
recipient
to ~/.gnupg/options
HTH
> % When I send an encrypted mail to somebody, the encrypted version is saved in
> % =sent-mail. What I'd (in retrospect) sometimes like is an unencrypted
> % version saved too, preferably automatically. Is this doable?
>
> Yep, in version 1.2 (and probably 1.1.x for x > 11 or so). The manual
>
On 2000-06-04 20:44:26 +1000, CaT wrote:
> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
hmmm...
> Well if you check my X-Mailer header now... :)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:08:57AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-06-04 16:32:44 +1000, CaT wrote:
>
> > for example this is one message in the mailbox that is
> > currupt. Not that it consists of virtually missing
> > headers and that it is two messages concatenated into
> > one. And ev
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:08:57AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2000-06-04 16:32:44 +1000, CaT wrote:
>
> > for example this is one message in the mailbox that is
> > currupt. Not that it consists of virtually missing
> > headers and that it is two messages concatenated into
> > one. And ev
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 11:19:46AM +0200, clemensF wrote:
> are you using several mutt windows in a gui or mbox formatted mailboxes
> without locked access?
I'm using several mutts but they're all on a different mailbox.
--
CaT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) URL: http://www.zip.com.a
> Thomas Roessler:
> than maildir for large mailboxes. Just imagine a rather
> traditional Unix file system design having to deal with
> 7k5 files in _one_ directory...
this might trouble the traditional linux (linear search) fs.
--
clemens
On 2000-06-03 23:42:17 -0700, Anton Graham wrote:
> I would guess that your problem stems, in part, from
> the fact that the mbox format is not really designed
> for a 47 meg box with 7500+ messages.
Personally, I have mbox folders with several 1e5 messages,
and have not experienced any proble
On 2000-06-04 16:32:44 +1000, CaT wrote:
> for example this is one message in the mailbox that is
> currupt. Not that it consists of virtually missing
> headers and that it is two messages concatenated into
> one. And even then the message bodies are incomplete
> and the body of the first message
are you using several mutt windows in a gui or mbox formatted mailboxes
without locked access?
--
clemens
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 12:38:35PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >Ok. Not to be faceatous(sp?) or anything... just being curious :) What
> >will this prove/solve/whatnot? I may have missed out on a bit of info
> >in that, from memory, if I clear /t
Anton Graham proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>I would guess that your problem stems, in part, from the fact that the
>mbox format is not really designed for a 47 meg box with 7500+
>messages. I would seriously consider saving some of those messages in
So which is the best one? Here at the Juno
On Sun, 04 Jun 2000, CaT wrote:
> I don't suppose I have a hope in getting any sort of responce to this?
>
> It is kinda important and I'd be more then happy to help track down the
> problem but at the moment I've gotten SFA responce to it which may mean
> that noone really cares if mutt corrupt
CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Ok. Not to be faceatous(sp?) or anything... just being curious :) What
>will this prove/solve/whatnot? I may have missed out on a bit of info
>in that, from memory, if I clear /tmp then it eventually safes (albeit
>in an icky corrupted manner).
>
>Anyways, jus
On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 12:13:38PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> CaT proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> >Mutt does corrupt if it cannot recover from this situation without
> >corrupting the mailbox. It's not that the mailbox is saved, intact
>
> It should _not_ find itself in such a s
35 matches
Mail list logo
