On Sun, 04 Jun 2000, CaT wrote:
> I don't suppose I have a hope in getting any sort of responce to this?
>
> It is kinda important and I'd be more then happy to help track down the
> problem but at the moment I've gotten SFA responce to it which may mean
> that noone really cares if mutt corrupts mailboxes.
I would guess that your problem stems, in part, from the fact that the
mbox format is not really designed for a 47 meg box with 7500+
messages. I would seriously consider saving some of those messages in
other mailboxes. This would help alleviate this problem and
undoubtedly make finding specific messages easier.
Personally, I have a cron job that runs at midnight on the first of
each month which moves all of my mail storage into an archive
directory and compresses the boxes. This prevents overly large
mailboxes.
--
_
_|_|_
( ) * Anton Graham
/v\ / <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/( )X
(m_m) GPG ID: 18F78541
Penguin Powered!
