Christian Ullrich schrieb am Samstag, 21.08.1999:
> I did just notice that my mutt 0.95.7i won't speak to me in german.
> I compiled it --with-included-gettext and without that option, but
> it always speaks english.
OK, forget it, I recompiled, and now it works. But why?
--
Christian Ullrich
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 12:52:33AM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl spewed forth:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 06:29:07PM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> >
> > So why won't it match on ~/folders/funnies ??
>
> Maybe mutt doesn't expand ~ correctly ? Maybe try the full path (or
> $HOME) instead?
Nope...tried bo
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 06:29:07PM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
>
> So why won't it match on ~/folders/funnies ??
Maybe mutt doesn't expand ~ correctly ? Maybe try the full path (or
$HOME) instead?
CU,
Sec
--
"Oderint dum metuant. Let them hate so long as they fear."
-- Lucius Accius (170-9
Okay...here's my setup:
mbox-hook .* =received
save-hook ~A =received
folder-hook . 'set move=ask-yes'
folder-hook folders/funnies 'set move=no'
folder-hook > 'set move=no'
This does EXACTLY what I wanted all along (thanks, folks!!)...-except-
there's a bug. :(
Note my second folder-hook. The
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 11:43:22AM -0400, Pete Toscano wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 01:52:57PM -0400, Pete Toscano wrote:
> > > problems i still see:
> > >
> > > . do we want to make the directory vs file detection smarter? searching
> > >
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 23 Aug 1999:
> save-hook ~A >
>
> This hook matches all messages and suggests a default save folder of
> ">", which expands to "=received" by default.
...
> It will *also* run the other hooks that match. Since they occur
> *later*, they
On Aug/22/1999, Jan Peter Hecking wrote:
> Now you're missing an newline at the end of the string. Try
>
> mailboxes `find $HOME/mail -type f -print | tr '\n' ' ';echo`
>
> instead. Beware also that the tilde ~ doesn't get expanded - you
> have to use $HOME instead.
Yep, you're right.
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 03:40:20PM -0500, David DeSimone spewed forth:
> Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > what I'm -also- trying to do is get the place to save to set to
> > =received as well...
>
> save-hook ~A >
Would mbox-hook also be used the same way, then? Or basicall
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> what I'm -also- trying to do is get the place to save to set to
> =received as well...
save-hook ~A >
This hook matches all messages and suggests a default save folder of
">", which expands to "=received" by default.
> > It doesn't try to pick
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 02:11:22PM -0500, David DeSimone spewed forth:
> Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Basically, I want all read messages to go to =received when quitting or
> > changing folders. But NOT when I'm in certain folders (like
> > /home/fairlite/folders/funnies, which h
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 06:49:33PM +0100, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> Can people who follow-up to messages on this list and
> include the previous messages (generally tagged on at the
> end), remove the headers (or the irrelevant ones at least).
Ofcourse, replies should _always_ go _under_ the text yo
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Basically, I want all read messages to go to =received when quitting or
> changing folders. But NOT when I'm in certain folders (like
> /home/fairlite/folders/funnies, which has 900+ jokes from over the years),
> or when I'm already in =received...things
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 01:38:16PM -0500, David DeSimone spewed forth:
> Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Now if someone could just help me out with UNsetting hooks from a few
> > days ago...still haven't found an answer... :)
>
> That's because there isn't one. There is no way to r
On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:13:31PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> You should all check out Brian Winters version, which is reportedly rather
> stable and was written from scratch.
IMNSHO you should follow Jeremey's advice. ;) I can tell you from
experience that hacking on their elm.c example unt
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now if someone could just help me out with UNsetting hooks from a few
> days ago...still haven't found an answer... :)
That's because there isn't one. There is no way to remove a hook.
However, I haven't really seen a case where a hook needed to be remo
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 12:26:17PM -0500, David DeSimone spewed forth:
> Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is this an outdated part of the manual, or is there something I'm
> > missing here? When I go to reply, what is the "send-menu" ??? The
> > part with all the headers and attachme
rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Pasting to Xjed running as Mutt's editor worked under RH5.2. With
> RH6.0 and KDE it does not -- nothing happens. Pasting _from_ Xjed
> while composing a message still works, but usually I want to go the
> other way.
Mutt just runs in an xterm, or rxvt, or wha
Martin Maciaszek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First is /tmp/mutt-nexus-29263-0 which is the message itself
> without the headers.
> Second is /tmp/mutt-nexus-29263-2 which consists onyl of the
> following lines:
> +language=en +pubring=/home/fastjack/.pgp/pubring.pgp
> +secring=/home/fastjack/.p
Can people who follow-up to messages on this list and
include the previous messages (generally tagged on at the
end), remove the headers (or the irrelevant ones at least).
Due to previous mail loops problems, some of the received
lines cause the loop detection to kick in, thus the messages
get se
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is this an outdated part of the manual, or is there something I'm
> missing here? When I go to reply, what is the "send-menu" ??? The
> part with all the headers and attachments and such? I only get that
> after editing my message, not before.
I guess "
On Monday, 23 August 1999 at 09:34, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Hi, folks --
>
> I've managed to get 0.95.7i compiled up for Solaris (thanks!) and I
> can connect to my exchange inbox using the muttrc.sample from the
> distribution. I tried to drop in a copy of my muttrc from my real
> serv
Attila Csosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> from manual:
>
> index_format:
> ...
> Default: "%4C %Z %{%b %d} %-15.15L (%4l) %s"
>
> Where is here the format specifier for the From: field??
> What should I change to get a list of specifiers for my sent-items?
The very manual that you
- Original Message -
From: Steve Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Users' List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: ssl-imap and mutt
> On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:49:27AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
>
> > > Will mutt talk ssl-im
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:49:27AM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > Will mutt talk ssl-imap to my ssl-imap-capable server? Is there
> > anything specific to set up, or will it just happen automagically?
> I don't think so. But I don't know anything about the SSL-IMAP protocol. If
> anyone has any
will do. Actually that's probably the best bet for me anyway, since I wonder
whether US crypto regulations would prevent me from releasing more invasive
SSL support...
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: David Thorburn-G
On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 01:52:57PM -0400, Pete Toscano wrote:
> > problems i still see:
> >
> > . do we want to make the directory vs file detection smarter? searching
> > for a '/' at the end seems kind of brain-dead, but can we make it better
>
Possibly, you can implement this using some wrapper tools. I seem
to recall that you can use ssl-wrap to "sslify" software which
doesn't support SSL as is. Please investigate this path further
before starting to add OpenSSL to mutt. ;-)
Thanks.
On 1999-08-23 09:49:27 -0400, Brendan Cully wrote
> Will mutt talk ssl-imap to my ssl-imap-capable server? Is there
> anything specific to set up, or will it just happen automagically?
I don't think so. But I don't know anything about the SSL-IMAP protocol. If
anyone has any docs or pointers to this protocol, I'll investigate adding
support for
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 12:38:05AM +0200, Martin Maciaszek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 05:28:31PM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> > Where the `yes` is coming from unless you configured it that way, I have
> > no idea...
> I tried running yes from the command line. It just spits out
> endless line
Hi, folks --
Will mutt talk ssl-imap to my ssl-imap-capable server? Is there
anything specific to set up, or will it just happen automagically?
TIA
:-D
--
David Thorburn-Gundlach * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- f
Hi, folks --
I've managed to get 0.95.7i compiled up for Solaris (thanks!) and I
can connect to my exchange inbox using the muttrc.sample from the
distribution. I tried to drop in a copy of my muttrc from my real
server and change a few vars (inbox, record, and imap_user, while
getting rid of al
On 1999-08-22 23:33:23 -0400, Ken W wrote:
> I have bothered Sven enough. What is the difference between
> hdr_format and index_format? Did index just replace hdr? Since I set
> up my .muttrc I guess with mutt 0.88 or so, that is what I have for my
> indexes.
>From init.h:
{ "hdr_format",
32 matches
Mail list logo
