On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:05:14AM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
>The "Subject:" field is the most common and contains a short
>string identifying the topic of the message. When used in a
>reply, the field body MAY start with the string "Re: " (an
>abbreviation of the Latin "in re", mea
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:20:55PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy (ke...@8t8.us)
> wrote:
>
> > I've been told other prefixes are often used in some lists, and the
> > practice is getting more common.
>
> Other prefixes have also long
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 04:27:10PM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:25:27PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:57:37PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > > Kevin J. McCarthy wrote on Thu, 13 Jan 2022
> > > at 23:20:55 EST in :
> > >
> > > > I've be
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:37:06AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2022-01-13 19:41:12 -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:42:27PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > > Perhaps language from RFC5322 Sec. 3.6.5 should be imported into the
> > > documentation for $reply_prefix,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:25:27PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:57:37PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > Kevin J. McCarthy wrote on Thu, 13 Jan 2022
> > at 23:20:55 EST in :
> >
> > > I've been told other prefixes are often used in some lists, and the
> > > practi
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I strongly disagree with the addition of $reply_prefix
> (commit 9c1ce59874ce1c8e97d0c5bd71847596dafb1d50), as this is
> contrary to RFC 5322, and non-standard prefixes are annoying
> in practice and not necessarily recognized by ot
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:19:39AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2022-01-13 15:36:04 -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > So... The only difference between this and hdrdefault is that
> > hdrdefault's order does not matter. This is a very minor difference,
> > and the distinction disappears so lon
Hi,
On Friday, 2022-01-14 14:36:13 +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> > > It MAY, and it MAY NOT. There is no strict rule to it.
> >
> > Indeed, it doesn't say "MAY NOT", so that "Re: " is not forbidden.
> > But this does not mean that other prefixes are allowed.
>
> Quite contrary, my understanding is
* Vincent Lefevre [2022-01-14 12:20]:
> On 2022-01-14 11:05:14 +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> > I do not see anything that is "against" the RFC5322.
>
> You misread it. See my other replies.
>
> > It MAY, and it MAY NOT. There is no strict rule to it.
>
> Indeed, it doesn't say "MAY NOT", so that "
On 2022-01-14 11:05:14 +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> I do not see anything that is "against" the RFC5322.
You misread it. See my other replies.
> It MAY, and it MAY NOT. There is no strict rule to it.
Indeed, it doesn't say "MAY NOT", so that "Re: " is not forbidden.
But this does not mean that oth
On 2022-01-14 09:49:12 +0100, Fredrik Gustafsson wrote:
> That's already the case. For example in Sweden, "Sv:" is used instead of
> "Re:". This is not a mutt decision and
> the decision is already made for us. We can like it or dislike it.
Fortunately most people do not use it. In my mail archive
On 2022-01-14 09:10:19 +0200, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:20:55PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy (ke...@8t8.us)
> wrote:
>
> > I've been told other prefixes are often used in some lists, and the
> > practice is getting more common.
>
> Other prefixes have also long been used b
Den fre 14 jan. 2022 kl 09:38 skrev Vincent Lefevre :
> Imagine that any language (including those in a non-Latin script)
> would like to use its own reply prefix, and the complexity to handle
> that...
>
That's already the case. For example in Sweden, "Sv:" is used instead of
"Re:". This is not
On 2022-01-13 21:25:27 -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:57:37PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > One is confined to the content of a message and the other affects
> > critical message metadata that is often displayed in abbreviated form.
>
> "Critical message metadata"
On 2022-01-13 19:41:12 -0800, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 09:42:27PM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
> > Although my personal preference is that this is not a knob Mutt needs,
> > I am cognizant that some other popular MUAs use "RE: " rather than
> > "Re: " and while that looks horri
* Tapani Tarvainen [2022-01-14 10:20]:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:20:55PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy (ke...@8t8.us)
> wrote:
>
> > I've been told other prefixes are often used in some lists, and the
> > practice is getting more common.
>
> Other prefixes have also long been used by some non-Eng
16 matches
Mail list logo
