On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I strongly disagree with the addition of $reply_prefix > (commit 9c1ce59874ce1c8e97d0c5bd71847596dafb1d50), as this is > contrary to RFC 5322, and non-standard prefixes are annoying > in practice and not necessarily recognized by other users. > > Sure, a user could already change it manually (or automatically > with things like wrappers), but he should not be encouraged to > do so (in particular by making this automatic). End users are not > necessarily aware of RFCs and technical issues behind some choices.
I wholeheartedly agree. I'm pretty sure I already said that somewhere... or at least meant to. :) -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
