On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 08:20:55PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy (ke...@8t8.us) > wrote: > > > I've been told other prefixes are often used in some lists, and the > > practice is getting more common. > > Other prefixes have also long been used by some non-English speakers > and lists.
Indeed, which is why the RFC exists. But it has long been a design principle of Mutt that it should emit only output which conforms to the RFCs, in keeping with the robustness principle: "Be lenient in what you accept, but strict in what you emit." When other mail clients (or mail users) do not adhere to that, Mutt is not at fault. I realize there is an element of "tilting at windmills" to this, but, if you run into such cases which cause issues, your complaint should be with tthose users or mail clients, not Mutt, since Mutt obeys the rules. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail due to spam prevention. Sorry for the inconvenience.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
