On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 10:36:25PM -0800, Robert Spier wrote:
> The idea comes up periodically, and I mention it to someone about
> every six months, but it is always shot down, usually with some
> comment having to do with inertia.
At OpenFoundry (http://upload.openfoundry.org/) here, we are
begi
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:37:53AM +0100, Arthur Bergman wrote:
> On tisdag, mar 25, 2003, at 07:36 Europe/Stockholm, Robert Spier wrote:
>
> >>Robert, has anybody talked with you if and how RT could work for
> >>managing module namespace requests? You probably know how the process
> >>currently i
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:37:53 +0100, Arthur Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> The flow would look like this:
>>
>> 1. CPAN authors use a form on PAUSE...
>> 2. Email gets sent to RT and placed in the modules queue
>> 3. RT sends a copy of the request to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 4. RT tr
On tisdag, mar 25, 2003, at 07:36 Europe/Stockholm, Robert Spier wrote:
Robert, has anybody talked with you if and how RT could work for
managing module namespace requests? You probably know how the process
currently is structured:
The idea comes up periodically, and I mention it to someone about
> Robert, has anybody talked with you if and how RT could work for
> managing module namespace requests? You probably know how the process
> currently is structured:
The idea comes up periodically, and I mention it to someone about
every six months, but it is always shot down, usually with some
c
Tim, on this mailing list RT was mentioned as an idea, but I don't
know if anybody has taken steps ahead.
Robert, has anybody talked with you if and how RT could work for
managing module namespace requests? You probably know how the process
currently is structured:
1. CPAN authors can use a form
There was talk of using RT to manage requests.
Tim.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 09:59:06AM +0100, Johan Vromans wrote:
> "Philip Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > But the fact that [EMAIL PROTECTED] appears like a black hole fairly
> > often is not new.
>
> Does anyone have any idea how ma
"Philip Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But the fact that [EMAIL PROTECTED] appears like a black hole fairly
> often is not new.
Does anyone have any idea how many module requests are still
unfulfilled after, say, three weeks?
-- Johan
On 20 Mar 2003 at 11:48, Arthur Corliss wrote:
> I understand that, but if we have a scaling problem I don't think
> the solution is just to ignore it. This is a community-driven
> resource, if you make it difficult for the community to participate,
> you'll undermine the value of it.
People se
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:20:04 -0900 (AKST), Arthur Corliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Ah, but do you really want to create a whole new top-level namespace just for
> me?
If nobody finds an appropriate existing one, yes.
> Keep in mind that no ^Widget:: space is currently in ex
[Disclaimer: I'm not a PAUSE admin, just another user]
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:13:35 -0900 (AKST), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Arthur Corliss) wrote:
> All I expect is this: either "register" the module so it shows in the pause
> interface, or tell me no, you don't think it's a worth-while addition to CPA
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> Thanks for the very concise description what this module does. What
> about
>
>Widget::FixedWidthFont::Input
>
> or something like that. See, how I pull that name out of your
> description: if something's still missing to make the name really
> d
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 08:30:32 -0900 (AKST), Arthur Corliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> Believe me, I am doing so, and I'll end up putting this under Curses::Widgets
> if it doesn't get accepted by you. As I mentioned above, though, *any*
> widget, curses or otherwise, that uses
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> > As I've said in previous conversations on the list, I'm not going to just
> > upload whatever modules I feel like, I'll only pollute the namespace I'm
> > granted by you guys.
>
> This is the central mistake, we do not speak ex cathedra and w
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 12:13:35 -0900 (AKST), Arthur Corliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> As I've said in previous conversations on the list, I'm not going to just
> upload whatever modules I feel like, I'll only pollute the namespace I'm
> granted by you guys.
This is the central
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Kurt Starsinic wrote:
> Arthur,
>
> I'm sorry you've been disappointed with the response. The denizens
> of this list are here to provide advice on naming your modules, and
> comments about similiarities/differences to other modules on CPAN.
>
> You can upload your mo
On Mar 18, Arthur Corliss wrote:
> Today marks precisely one month since I first submitted Text::InputRepository
> for consideration for inclusion on CPAN. To date I've only had *one* response
> which was mostly concerned with the name choice. Since then I've had zero
> responses to my replies an
I'd like a final decision from you
guys.
I understand that this list is staffed on a volunteer basis but trying to
register a module is like pulling teeth. This is getting ridiculous. If you
need more bodies, then how does one apply?! I can't be the only one getting
aggravated with
18 matches
Mail list logo
