On 20 Mar 2003 at 11:48, Arthur Corliss wrote: > I understand that, but if we have a scaling problem I don't think > the solution is just to ignore it. This is a community-driven > resource, if you make it difficult for the community to participate, > you'll undermine the value of it.
People seem to be aware that this is a problem. However, I'm not sure what, if anything, is done about it. But the fact that [EMAIL PROTECTED] appears like a black hole fairly often is not new. > > I think the best one can do is prod, gently, every once in a while if no > > response has come -- say, every three weeks or so. > > Oh, I plan to, I just wish I didn't have to send out frustrated e-mails like > this before I get a response. As it stands, they only seem to respond to me > when I'm on the verge of a conniption. . . Sometimes it's better, sometimes it's worse. Probably highly variable and dependent on things such as current workload of the people involved (not to mention whether the module name is obvious or slightly controversial). Better luck next time! Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
