On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:40:20AM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > > That's why I suggested AXKIT. Isn't AXKIT two sylables?
> > >
> > > Apache::AXKIT::...
> > >
> > > A
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 08:43:47AM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
> > [snip]
> >
> > This is a request for the AXDTK::* namespace. I would like to use thi
Yes it is possible, for example libwww, libnet and many others all do it.
Graham.
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:49:00AM -0400, Joshua Pritikin wrote:
> Does anyone know?
>
> - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
> Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:41:23 +0100
> Subjec
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 04:13:27PM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
>
> > Yes. You can have a distribution called, for example, MailTools or libnet
> > or TimeDate without a MailTools.pm or libnet.pm or TimeDate.pm (Hi,
> > Graham!).
>
> OK, so if I set Make
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> Yes. You can have a distribution called, for example, MailTools or libnet
> or TimeDate without a MailTools.pm or libnet.pm or TimeDate.pm (Hi,
> Graham!).
OK, so if I set Makefile.PL to have:
NAME => 'Apache::AxKit',
DISTNAME => 'AxKit',
will CPAN in
At 10.49 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>Does anyone know?
>
>- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
>Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:41:23 +0100
>Subject: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
&g
uess you don't want ;-)
>
> - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
> Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:41:23 +0100
> Subject: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
&
Does anyone know?
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:41:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EM
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > That's why I suggested AXKIT. Isn't AXKIT two sylables?
> >
> > Apache::AXKIT::...
> >
> > Apache::XML::Kit::...
>
> OK, I think I might go with AxKit. Thanks for your help
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:01:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > Look, we're not suggesting that you to rename it to:
> >
> > Apache::XML::DeliveryToolkit
> >
> > Even so, are we being too picky?
>
> Its a hard problem (I think someone said
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> 1. Giving evidence of past sins isn't a good argument for the perpetuation
> of the same sins. Not that all of the above are sins, beause some of them
> aren't.
I realise that. I was just trying to add humour. I also know though that
people would like t
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 02:40:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> > > I think I'd prefer Apache::XML::* or something. I do not like cryptic
> > > top-level names, and I do not like acronyms for top-leve
At 14.40 +0100 2000.05.01, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>Right, fixing it is always possible (except the module is already in use -
>so that's another issue). However lets take a look at CPAN's root
>directory:
>
>ARS
>ACE
>B
>BBDB
>BnP
>CIPP
>Cdk
>Cz
>DCE
>DWH_File
>ERG
>FFI
>LSF
>LWP
>MOP
>NNML
>PDL
>PO
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 02:40:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> > I think I'd prefer Apache::XML::* or something. I do not like cryptic
> > top-level names, and I do not like acronyms for top-level names (unless
> > they are widely known, standards,
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:22:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > At 8.43 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > >On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of m
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> At 8.43 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> This is a request for the AXDTK::* nam
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:22:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 8.43 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
> >> [snip]
>
> I think I'd prefe
At 8.43 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
>> [snip]
>>
>> This is a request for the AXDTK::* namespace. I would like to use this
>> namespace rather
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
> > [snip]
> >
> > This is a request for the AXDTK::* namespace. I would like to use this
> > namespace rathe
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
> [snip]
>
> This is a request for the AXDTK::* namespace. I would like to use this
> namespace rather than continue to fill up the already over-used Apache::*
The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
delivering XML to clients in a variety of formats using nothing but W3C
standards. The idea is very similar to Cocoon, but AXDTK features a much
tighter binding to Apache, and much more standards oriented (Cocoon
implements some
21 matches
Mail list logo
