Does anyone know?
----- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:41:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > > That's why I suggested AXKIT. Isn't AXKIT two sylables?
> > >
> > > Apache::AXKIT::...
> > >
> > > Apache::XML::Kit::...
> >
> > OK, I think I might go with AxKit. Thanks for your help.
>
> Chop, chop. :-)
>
> So I think the big question is whether we can convince you to keep the
> Apache:: prefix...
Well... maybe. ;-)
It should be possible to distribute it as AxKit-X.XX.tar.gz, but have it
install as Apache::AxKit::*, right?
--
<Matt/>
Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists
Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions
Email for training and consultancy availability.
http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org
