Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK

[Tim Bunce]

On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 10:40:20AM -0400, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > > That's why I suggested AXKIT.  Isn't AXKIT two sylables?
> > > 
> > >   Apache::AXKIT::...
> > > 
> > >   Apache::XML::Kit::...
> > 
> > OK, I think I might go with AxKit. Thanks for your help.
> 
> Chop, chop.  :-)
> 
> So I think the big question is whether we can convince you to keep the
> Apache:: prefix...

I don't see a need for that. I think any framework (eg a loosely
related set of modules) should be free to live below it's own top level
name _if_ that name is suitably obscure, like AdKit.

Tim.