On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> Does anyone know?
One solution is to have a single top-level .pm file AxKit.pm and add
Apache::* stuff to an Apache directory in the distribution. However then
I'm expecting that I end up occupying the AxKit namespace in CPAN, which I
guess you don't want ;-)
>
> ----- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----
>
> Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:41:23 +0100
> Subject: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > > > That's why I suggested AXKIT. Isn't AXKIT two sylables?
> > > >
> > > > Apache::AXKIT::...
> > > >
> > > > Apache::XML::Kit::...
> > >
> > > OK, I think I might go with AxKit. Thanks for your help.
> >
> > Chop, chop. :-)
> >
> > So I think the big question is whether we can convince you to keep the
> > Apache:: prefix...
>
> Well... maybe. ;-)
>
> It should be possible to distribute it as AxKit-X.XX.tar.gz, but have it
> install as Apache::AxKit::*, right?
>
>
--
<Matt/>
Fastnet Software Ltd. High Performance Web Specialists
Providing mod_perl, XML, Sybase and Oracle solutions
Email for training and consultancy availability.
http://sergeant.org http://xml.sergeant.org
