On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > > That's why I suggested AXKIT. Isn't AXKIT two sylables? > > > > Apache::AXKIT::... > > > > Apache::XML::Kit::... > > OK, I think I might go with AxKit. Thanks for your help. Chop, chop. :-) So I think the big question is whether we can convince you to keep the Apache:: prefix... -- "Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Chris Nandor
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Chris Nandor
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Tim Bunce
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Chris Nandor
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Matt Sergeant
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Graham Barr
- Re: Fwd: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK Graham Barr