In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Perhaps _you_ could suggest appropriate names for these two modules ?
> > I suggest what i have already suggested:
> > CGI::Auth::NameOfAuthType
> > Term::UI::NameOfUIType
> Thanks for you suggestions. I just need to clarify
> > Perhaps _you_ could suggest appropriate names for these two modules ?
> I suggest what i have already suggested:
> CGI::Auth::NameOfAuthType
> Term::UI::NameOfUIType
Thanks for you suggestions. I just need to clarify one detail:
Are the words NameOfAuthType and NameOfUIType intended as li
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Obviously this iteration is not converging. I don't have your knowledge
> of the CPAN hierarchy, I'm not able to guess your requirements, and I
the requirements are:
* descriptive name
* obvious name
* name that allows for e
> > > > I did consider CGI::Authenticate or CGI::Auth but they confuse
> > > > with the utterly unrelated CGI::Authent and didn't fit the ...
> > >
> > > i don't see how they are confusing. I think you should choose
> > > a more descriptive name.
> >
> > OK, I propose CGI::Auth
>
> since your mod
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's leave the namespace-registration-response-rate issue and the
> Crypt::Tea issue aside for a moment and solve the two issues which
> seem to be within sight of solution:
>
>
> about CGI::Htauth ...
>
> > > I did consider CGI::Aut
Let's leave the namespace-registration-response-rate issue and the
Crypt::Tea issue aside for a moment and solve the two issues which
seem to be within sight of solution:
about CGI::Htauth ...
> > I did consider CGI::Authenticate or CGI::Auth but they confuse with
> > the utterly unrelated CGI::
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So on that basis I stayed with Crypt::Tea. I don't think Tea_PP is
> appropriate, for two reasons; firstly half the code is JavaScript, which
none of the code is JavaScript. this is a Perl module, isn't it?
if you output JavaScript, t
Sorry this is a long post, but then of course there is a rather large
backlog of things to be discussed. brian d foy wrote:
> there is already a Crypt::TEA, so i suggest working with that author
> or extending his module
I corresponded with Abhijit Menon-Sen back in 2001 when the module was
intr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tassilo V. Parseval
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > On 23jan2002, on 20may2002, on 4jul2002, on 12jul2002, on 28aug2002,
> > I wrote about the "Sorry, there are no modules registered belonging
> > to PJB" message I was getting when
Also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On 23jan2002, on 20may2002, on 4jul2002, on 12jul2002, on 28aug2002,
> I wrote about the "Sorry, there are no modules registered belonging
> to PJB" message I was getting when I tried to "Edit Module Metadata".
> There should be CGI::Htauth, Term::Clui, Crypt::Tea
On 18dec2001 I registered the Crypt::Tea namespace.
On 14jan2002 I registered the Term::Clui namespace.
On 6mar2002 I registered the CGI::Htauth namespace.
On 19oct2002 I registered the Math::Evol namespace.
But, then and forever, from "Edit Module Metadata":
> Sorry, there are no modules regi
11 matches
Mail list logo
