In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So on that basis I stayed with Crypt::Tea. I don't think Tea_PP is > appropriate, for two reasons; firstly half the code is JavaScript, which
none of the code is JavaScript. this is a Perl module, isn't it? if you output JavaScript, that's just text. i'm dubious that the module should even output any sort of code. that seems better suited to templates. > hardly qualifies as Pure Perl, and also I'm not committed to retaining > even the server end in Perl if someone wants to squeeze higher performance > by translating it into C or something. There is no commonality in the > code between Crypt::Tea and Crypt::TEA. they both implement TEA. the implementation details aren't that important. i think you should work to extend Crypt::TEA rather than reinvent it. > Htauth is, as the README says, early alpha. > "ht" are the first two letters of "http", and I don't see them as an > apache patent. I admit that Ht is tautologous with CGI:: ... i don't see how "HyperText" (the first two words with HTTP) have anything to do with your module. i think you should choose a better name. you keep using "tautology", but i don't think it means what you think it means. HTTP or HTML are not CGI. they have different namespaces. > I did consider CGI::Authenticate or CGI::Auth but they confuse with > the utterly unrelated CGI::Authent and didn't fit the Htui Htauth i don't see how they are confusing. I think you should choose a more descriptive name. > > Term::Clui needs a better name, i think > But Clui is pronouncable, which Vtui isn't, and the Vt is tautologous > with Term:: , and there's a whole generation out there now who have never > heard of a vt100. i don't find any of this convincing. Clui makes no sense to me. i think you should choose a more descriptive name. -- brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
