> > > > I did consider CGI::Authenticate or CGI::Auth but they confuse > > > > with the utterly unrelated CGI::Authent and didn't fit the ... > > > > > > i don't see how they are confusing. I think you should choose > > > a more descriptive name. > > > > OK, I propose CGI::Auth > > since your module does a particular sort of authorization, you should > add another level.
> > > > But Clui is pronouncable, which Vtui isn't, and the Vt is > > > > tautologous with Term:: , and there's a whole generation out > > > > there now who have never heard of a vt100. > > > > > > i don't find any of this convincing. Clui makes no sense to me. > > > > OK, I propose Term::Vtui # yes indeed, I meant Term not GCI :-) > > Vtui is no more descriptive that Clui. > perhaps we need something like Term::UI::* Obviously this iteration is not converging. I don't have your knowledge of the CPAN hierarchy, I'm not able to guess your requirements, and I really can't imagine more descriptive names than Term::Vtui or CGI::Auth. Perhaps _you_ could suggest appropriate names for these two modules ? You could bear in mind that there is already Authen:: and that Term:: is already part of User_Interfaces. Look forward to hearing from you, Regards, Peter Billam Peter Billam http://www.pjb.com.au [EMAIL PROTECTED] (03) 6236 9410 GPO Box 669, Hobart TAS 7001, Australia. Original compositions made to be played, and Arrangements of Bach, Schubert, Brahms... Special Offer ! Everything Free ! And, soon . . . November at the Carousel !
