On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure who's currently on the modules list,
>
> [perlmail@tmtowtdi perlmail]$ ezmlm-list ~/modules/
Oh, that is sad.
Ashley Winters -- first post in 2 years.
Greetings, I think I have something to offer the world. Here's my info in
the order you asked for it at
http://www.cpan.org/modules/04pause.html#registering. Please consider
establishing a developer account for me.
=== Info ===
Name: Scott Thomason
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Webs
(This Mail was generated by the server
https://pause.kbx.de/pause/authenquery;ACTION=edit_cred
automatically)
Record update in the PAUSE users database:
userid: [OLPA]
fullname: [Oleg A. Paraschenko]
email: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] was [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
homepage: [http://beta.mat
Welcome Oleg A. Paraschenko,
PAUSE, the Perl Authors Upload Server, has a userid for you:
OLPA
Once you've gone through the procedure of password approval (see the
separate mail you should receive about right now), this userid will be
the one that you can use to upload your work or edit yo
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> Yes. You can have a distribution called, for example, MailTools or libnet
> or TimeDate without a MailTools.pm or libnet.pm or TimeDate.pm (Hi,
> Graham!).
OK, so if I set Makefile.PL to have:
NAME => 'Apache::AxKit',
DISTNAME => 'AxKit',
will CPAN in
At 10.49 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>Does anyone know?
>
>- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
>
>Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:41:23 +0100
>Subject: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 08:44:38AM -0400, Jon Orwant wrote:
> Joshua N Pritikin writes:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:19:51AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I´m developing a number of WAP related Perl modules, and would like to
> > > contribute them to CPAN.
> > > I am however a bit un
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> Does anyone know?
One solution is to have a single top-level .pm file AxKit.pm and add
Apache::* stuff to an Apache directory in the distribution. However then
I'm expecting that I end up occupying the AxKit namespace in CPAN, which I
guess you don'
Does anyone know?
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:41:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Request for Namespace: AXDTK
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PR
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:17:54PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > That's why I suggested AXKIT. Isn't AXKIT two sylables?
> >
> > Apache::AXKIT::...
> >
> > Apache::XML::Kit::...
>
> OK, I think I might go with AxKit. Thanks for your help
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 03:01:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > Look, we're not suggesting that you to rename it to:
> >
> > Apache::XML::DeliveryToolkit
> >
> > Even so, are we being too picky?
>
> Its a hard problem (I think someone said
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> 1. Giving evidence of past sins isn't a good argument for the perpetuation
> of the same sins. Not that all of the above are sins, beause some of them
> aren't.
I realise that. I was just trying to add humour. I also know though that
people would like t
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 02:40:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> > > I think I'd prefer Apache::XML::* or something. I do not like cryptic
> > > top-level names, and I do not like acronyms for top-leve
At 14.40 +0100 2000.05.01, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>Right, fixing it is always possible (except the module is already in use -
>so that's another issue). However lets take a look at CPAN's root
>directory:
>
>ARS
>ACE
>B
>BBDB
>BnP
>CIPP
>Cdk
>Cz
>DCE
>DWH_File
>ERG
>FFI
>LSF
>LWP
>MOP
>NNML
>PDL
>PO
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 02:40:51PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> > I think I'd prefer Apache::XML::* or something. I do not like cryptic
> > top-level names, and I do not like acronyms for top-level names (unless
> > they are widely known, standards,
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:22:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > At 8.43 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> > >On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of m
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Chris Nandor wrote:
> At 8.43 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> This is a request for the AXDTK::* nam
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:22:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 8.43 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
> >> [snip]
>
> I think I'd prefe
At 8.41 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:19:51AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I´m developing a number of WAP related Perl modules, and would like to
>> contribute them to CPAN.
>> I am however a bit unsure about what namespace/name hierachy to choose.
>>
At 8.43 -0400 2000.05.01, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
>> [snip]
>>
>> This is a request for the AXDTK::* namespace. I would like to use this
>> namespace rather
On Mon, 1 May 2000, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
> > [snip]
> >
> > This is a request for the AXDTK::* namespace. I would like to use this
> > namespace rathe
Joshua N Pritikin writes:
> On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:19:51AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I´m developing a number of WAP related Perl modules, and would like to
> > contribute them to CPAN.
> > I am however a bit unsure about what namespace/name hierachy to choose.
> > I would like
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 11:10:21PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Apache XML Delivery Toolkit is a new set of modules designed for
> [snip]
>
> This is a request for the AXDTK::* namespace. I would like to use this
> namespace rather than continue to fill up the already over-used Apache::*
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:19:51AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I´m developing a number of WAP related Perl modules, and would like to
> contribute them to CPAN.
> I am however a bit unsure about what namespace/name hierachy to choose.
> I would like the WAP:: toplevel name, with my individua
I´m developing a number of WAP related Perl modules, and would like to
contribute them to CPAN.
I am however a bit unsure about what namespace/name hierachy to choose.
I would like the WAP:: toplevel name, with my individual modules
released at second level as they get contributed.
Is there anoth
25 matches
Mail list logo