On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 08:44:38AM -0400, Jon Orwant wrote:
> Joshua N Pritikin writes:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 09:19:51AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I´m developing a number of WAP related Perl modules, and would like to
> > > contribute them to CPAN.
> > > I am however a bit unsure about what namespace/name hierachy to choose.
> > > I would like the WAP:: toplevel name, with my individual modules
> > > released at second level as they get contributed.
> >
> > Sounds good. What does 'WAP' stand for?
> >
> > > Is there another to level name that I should use?
> >
> > Not necessarily.
> >
> > --
> > "May the best description of competition prevail."
> > via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank
>
> WAP is the right top-level name.
I agree wholeheartedly.
Now, who dares claim that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a read-only list?
Peace,
* Kurt Starsinic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---------- Senior Network Engineer *
| `There is more ado to interpret interpretations than to interpret |
| the things, and more books upon books than upon all other subjects; |
| we do nothing but comment upon one another.' - Michael de Montaigne |
