[Mjpeg-users] yuvdenoise w/o options self-adapting?

2010-10-21 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi, The yuvdenoise manpage says: |As it is self-adapting to the noise-situation found in the stream |you normally just can go without any options set: I would just like to have a confirmation that this assertion is not outdated ;-) c -- \black\trash movie _COWBOY CANOE COMA_

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* Trent Piepho on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 11:33:01 -0700 > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Christian Ebert wrote: >> Index: yuvdenoise/main.c >> === >> RCS file: /cvsroot/mjpeg/mjpeg_play/yuvdenoise/m

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* Christian Ebert on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 19:49:02 +0200 > With this change, yuvdenoise builds again, but someone in the > know should check whether I've broken other stuff: And I did break it, but this seems to work: Index: yuvden

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* Christian Ebert on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 19:58:28 +0200 > * Bernhard Praschinger on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 19:17:13 +0200 >> I have at home a OSX 10.4.11 (PowerPC) and 10.6.4 (Intel) with gcc 4.2.1 >> and it compiles without problems on both computers. >> >&

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 19:17:13 +0200 >>> I tested your better version. And it compiles here on my linux and Intel >>> osx box. I did also a quick test with the new version on the linux box. >>> And it works well. >>> >>> So I would appreciate a feedback if it works

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* Trent Piepho on Friday, October 15, 2010 at 10:19:20 -0700 > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Christian Ebert wrote: > >> * Trent Piepho on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 17:38:39 -0700 >>> Looks like you didn't actually change the needed lines. >> >> No,

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* Trent Piepho on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 17:38:39 -0700 > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Christian Ebert wrote: > >> * Bernhard Praschinger on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 19:06:33 +0200 >>>> Oh yeah, this isn't on Linux. OSX probably has some kind of API

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-14 Thread Christian Ebert
* Christian Ebert on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 23:43:20 +0200 > * Bernhard Praschinger on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 19:06:33 +0200 >>> Oh yeah, this isn't on Linux. OSX probably has some kind of API for >>> checking if sse2 is available. Using CPUID isn't e

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-14 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Thursday, October 14, 2010 at 19:06:33 +0200 >> Oh yeah, this isn't on Linux. OSX probably has some kind of API for >> checking if sse2 is available. Using CPUID isn't enough, because sse >> requires OS support that might not be there. I.e., the cpu supports >> sse2 but

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-13 Thread Christian Ebert
* sfrase6 on Tuesday, October 12, 2010 at 18:06:17 + >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../utils -O3 -funroll-all-loops >> -ffast-math -march=nocona -mtune=nocona -g -O2 -I/sw/include -no-cpp-precomp >> -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wall -Wunused -MT main.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/main.Tpo -c -o >> main.

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-13 Thread Christian Ebert
* Trent Piepho on Tuesday, October 12, 2010 at 12:06:45 -0700 > It looks like the only use of ebx is in the code to detect CPU features > using cpuid. A better way to do it would be to read the /proc/cpuinfo file > and look for the sse2 or whatever flag. There is no /proc/ directory on MacOS X.

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-12 Thread Christian Ebert
* Christian Ebert on Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 14:51:22 +0100 > * Bernhard Praschinger on Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 15:14:35 +0200 >> I have tested your patch and sent it to CVS. So it will appear in the >> next version. > > However, it breaks building on M

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Mjpeg-developer] yuvdenoise performance patch

2010-10-10 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Sunday, October 10, 2010 at 15:14:35 +0200 > I have tested your patch and sent it to CVS. So it will appear in the > next version. However, it breaks building on MacOS 10.5.8: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../utils -O3 -funroll-all-loops -ffast-math -march=noco

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Fwd: Re: where is xlav?]

2009-11-12 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Thursday, November 12, 2009 at 19:05:47 +0100 > I have tired that command: > mencoder DVD.mpg -o test4.avi -oac copy -ovc lavc -lavcopts > vcodec=mjpeg:vbitrate=15000 > > There mplayer tells me that I have used a MJPG coded. But it seems to me > that they don't include

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [Fwd: Re: where is xlav?]

2009-11-12 Thread Christian Ebert
* Peter Vereshagin on Thursday, November 05, 2009 at 20:59:48 +0400 > sh -c mencoder -mf h=480:w=640:type=jpg -o "tmpvid" -ovc lavc -lavcopts > vcodec=mjpeg:vhq -ovc copy -noskip -ofps 5.000 mf://*.jpg -frames 785 1>&2 Not sure if this helps, but you have -ovc lavc *and* -ovc copy which contrad

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc -M and quality

2009-10-03 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Friday, October 02, 2009 at 15:50:41 -0700 > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Christian Ebert wrote: >> Has bumping up the -M option a negative effect on quality? > > No. But it also doesn't improve the encoding speed as much as > people would prefer. There a

[Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc -M and quality (was: Converting vnc session to a movie file)

2009-10-02 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi, [ sorry for half-hijacking the thread ] * Bernhard Praschinger on Friday, October 02, 2009 at 18:05:49 +0200 > Nagalenoj H. wrote: >> Mine is not dual core or more.. And that command(time with each command >> in pipe) doesn't work. I don't how I am going to reduce the conversion >> duration

Re: [Mjpeg-users] latest change to cpuinfo.sh breaks build on MacOS 10.5.8

2009-09-03 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Wednesday, September 02, 2009 at 20:19:18 +0200 > I have tested it here on a Suse and MAC 10.5.8, and it compiles here to. > > I get some error messages when I tries to compile the newdenoise.cc on > the mac. Strange, I don't (only lots of warnings for avilib): g++-4.0

Re: [Mjpeg-users] latest change to cpuinfo.sh breaks build on MacOS 10.5.8

2009-09-01 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi Steven, * Steven M. Schultz on Monday, August 31, 2009 at 15:03:33 -0700 > On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Christian Ebert wrote: >> $ sw_vers >> ProductName: Mac OS X >> ProductVersion: 10.5.8 > > Got your 10.6 on order ? :-) Nope ;-) > A change was checked in

[Mjpeg-users] latest change to cpuinfo.sh breaks build on MacOS 10.5.8

2009-08-31 Thread Christian Ebert
Hello, I believe it must be the last change to cpuinfo.sh that breaks compilation on MacOS X: [...] configure: MJPEG tools 1.9.2 build configuration : configure: configure: - X86 Optimizations: configure: - MMX/3DNow!/SSE enabled : true configure: - arch/cpu compiler flags : -

[Mjpeg-users] building cvs (was: y4mdenoise)

2009-06-05 Thread Christian Ebert
Salut Hervé, * Hervé on Thursday, June 04, 2009 at 21:58:29 +0200 > Le 4 juin 09 à 21:26, Steven Boswell II a écrit : >> For those of you that aren't subscribed to the mjpeg-developer list, >> I've been doing heavy development of y4mdenoise lately, I've finally >> found a practical implementat

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4mdenoise (was Re: build failure on MacOS 10.5.7)

2009-06-04 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven Boswell II on Thursday, June 04, 2009 at 12:26:15 -0700 > Whoops!  That was an integration error.  I just checked in the > fix.  Sorry about that! No prob. Builds fine now. Thanks. c -- \black\trash movie_C O W B O Y_ _C A N O E_ _C O M A_ Ein deutscher Western/A German Western --

[Mjpeg-users] build failure on MacOS 10.5.7

2009-06-04 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi, With latest CVS mjpegtools do not build anymore here: [...] Making all in y4mdenoise gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -I../utils -DNDEBUG -finline-functions -mdynamic-no-pic -march=nocona -mtune=nocona -g -O2 -I/sw/include -no-cpp-precomp -D_THREAD_SAFE -Wall -Wunus

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4m -> DV ??

2009-02-27 Thread Christian Ebert
* Mark Heath on Friday, February 27, 2009 at 09:22:11 +1100 > libav2yuv yourfile.avi | yourstabilizer | ffmpeg -f yuv4mpegpipe -i - - > i yourfile.avi -map 0.0 -map 1.1 yourdv.dv -map 0.0 -map 1.0 c -- \black\trash movie_C O W B O Y_ _C A N O E_ _C O M A_ Ein deutscher Western/A German We

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4m -> DV ??

2009-02-27 Thread Christian Ebert
* Mark Heath on Friday, February 27, 2009 at 11:25:45 +1100 > On 27/02/2009, at 10:33 AM, Christian Ebert wrote: >> ... | ffmpeg -f yuv4mpegpipe -i - >> >> but ffmpeg probably guesses right without specifying -f for >> input. > > ffmpeg uses the extension of the

Re: [Mjpeg-users] y4m -> DV ??

2009-02-26 Thread Christian Ebert
* Marko Cebokli on Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 21:01:46 +0100 > I am trying to transcode yuv4mpeg into DV - the idea is to use y4mstabilizer > to stabilize some clips before editing in Kino. > I would like to avoid an intermediate high-compression (inter-frame) format. > > So far I had little

Re: [Mjpeg-users] OT: compiling y4mscaler on MacOS X

2009-01-24 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi Steven, * Steven M. Schultz on Saturday, January 24, 2009 at 09:02:02 -0800 > On Sat, 24 Jan 2009, Christian Ebert wrote: >> ~/src/y4mscaler-9.0$ make >> y4mscaler.C: In function ‘int main(int, char**)’: >> y4mscaler.C:197: error: ‘LOG_INFO’ was not declared in this sco

[Mjpeg-users] OT: compiling y4mscaler on MacOS X

2009-01-24 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi, The thread about y4mstabilizer made me want to try it. But I need y4mscaler to switch to 444. Trying to compile it on MacOS 10.5.6 fails like so: ~/src/y4mscaler-9.0$ make g++ -DYS_VERSION_MAJOR=9 -DYS_VERSION_MINOR=0 -O2 -I /usr/local/include/mjpegtools -Wall -W-c -o graphics.o graphi

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc: any hope of further development?

2008-12-06 Thread Christian Ebert
* Stan Gammons on Saturday, December 06, 2008 at 07:37:00 -0600 > Has the quantization problem been fixed? As far as I could see, no sudden spikes of quantization factor. At least with my testing material. c -- \black\trash movie_C O W B O Y_ _C A N O E_ _C O M A_ Ein deutscher Western/A G

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc: any hope of further development?

2008-12-06 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi Andrew, * Christian Ebert on Friday, December 05, 2008 at 12:23:34 +0100 > * Andrew Stevens on Friday, December 05, 2008 at 00:33:28 +0100 >> Please let me know how your testing material pans out. > > I'd like to run it on a long video, for which I have to shuffle > a

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc: any hope of further development?

2008-12-05 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi Andrew, * Andrew Stevens on Friday, December 05, 2008 at 00:33:28 +0100 > I finally found the crucial oops that was causing problems. > The fix is now in CVS. Already installed. > Please let me know how your testing material pans out. I'd like to run it on a long video, for which I have to s

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc: any hope of further development?

2008-11-30 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi Andrew, * Andrew Stevens on Saturday, November 29, 2008 at 19:07:12 +0100 > mpeg2enc author here! Ah! Great to hear from you! >> Unfortunately I am unable to contribute constructively but I just >> wanted to send a periodic encouragement to take off with mpeg2enc >> where it was left in 2007-

[Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc: any hope of further development?

2008-09-20 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi, Unfortunately I am unable to contribute constructively but I just wanted to send a periodic encouragement to take off with mpeg2enc where it was left in 2007-02-20 (last working version). While this version still gives the me most satisfying results (compared to other tools) in dv -> dvd conve

Re: [Mjpeg-users] frame rate conversion

2008-05-25 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Sunday, May 25, 2008 at 08:50:55 -0700 > On OSX: > > pkg-config --libs mjpegtools > > says: > > -L/usr/local/lib -lmjpegutils -lmpeg2encpp > > So you can either use > > `pkg-config --libs mjpegtools' > > or manually add: > > -L/usr/local/lib -lmjpegutils -lm

[Mjpeg-users] OT: yuvafps build solved (was: frame rate conversion)

2008-05-25 Thread Christian Ebert
* Christian Ebert on Sunday, May 25, 2008 at 10:43:23 +0200 > * Mark Heath on Saturday, May 24, 2008 at 08:47:53 +1000 >> By the way I have my own blending framerate converter (yuvaifps) >> available on my lavtools site >> http://silicontrip.net/~mark/lavtools/index.php#

Re: [Mjpeg-users] frame rate conversion

2008-05-25 Thread Christian Ebert
* Mark Heath on Sunday, May 25, 2008 at 20:21:12 +1000 > On 25/05/2008, at 6:43 PM, Christian Ebert wrote: >> * Mark Heath on Saturday, May 24, 2008 at 08:47:53 +1000 >>> By the way I have my own blending framerate converter (yuvaifps) >>> available on my lavtools site

Re: [Mjpeg-users] frame rate conversion

2008-05-25 Thread Christian Ebert
* Mark Heath on Saturday, May 24, 2008 at 08:47:53 +1000 > By the way I have my own blending framerate converter (yuvaifps) > available on my lavtools site > http://silicontrip.net/~mark/lavtools/index.php#yuvafps On MacOS 10.4.11 with latest mjpegtools from cvs (except for mpeg2enc) I get: $ g

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuv toolchain order

2008-05-08 Thread Christian Ebert
* Stefan M. Fendt on Thursday, May 08, 2008 at 16:33:19 +0200 > Yes, indeed. yuvdeinterlace should (must...) be used at first, then > yuvdenoise (turn the values up to that point where you can see the first > negative effects of the denoiser and then try half the values...) and > then downscale...

[Mjpeg-users] yuv toolchain order

2008-05-07 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi, I want to downscale and deinterlace dv mov input. I'd like to make sure the order of my yuv toolchain is ok: $ qttoy4m i.mov | \ yuvscaler -M BICUBIC -O SIZE_320x240 | \ yuvdenoise | \ yuvdeinterlace | ... Should anything be changed in this order -- set up more by what I feel is right

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc

2008-04-20 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Sunday, April 20, 2008 at 12:43:03 +0200 >> * Bernhard Praschinger on Sunday, February 24, 2008 at 07:10:12 +0100 > Sorry that it took so long. Thanks for (trying) to boil it down! >>> And in the video "Nits - In the Dutch mountains" >>> >>> There you see a guy rowing a

Re: [Mjpeg-users] encoding Quicktime DV?

2008-03-29 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Frühmesser on Friday, March 28, 2008 at 20:50:17 +0100 > I was wondering if i can use mpeg2enc to encode (2-pass vbr) an Original > Quicktime DV Video File to mpeg2 with very high quality settings? Yes ;) In my experience, if you have a DV stream (infile.dv) you need something like ff

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc

2008-02-24 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Sunday, February 24, 2008 at 07:10:12 +0100 >> On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 17:31 +0100, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: >>> I have here a video (after about 30 where I didn't get it) where I get >>> the problem. mplex fails to multiplex it. >> A 30 minute video? > Sorry for beeing

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc

2008-02-22 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Friday, February 22, 2008 at 16:22:13 +0100 > Stan Gammons wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:30 +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: >>> * Stan Gammons on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 at 18:51:41 -0600 >>>> Is mpeg2enc still broken? >>>

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc

2008-02-21 Thread Christian Ebert
* Stan Gammons on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 at 18:51:41 -0600 > Is mpeg2enc still broken? Unfortunately, at least for me, it is. > I seem to recall something being said about there being > problems with large files I plead guilty to have sait it. As I work with dv sources the smallest reprod

Re: [Mjpeg-users] cvs HEAD mpeg2enc: still random quant amplitudes

2008-02-04 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi Andrew, * Andrew Stevens on Sunday, February 03, 2008 at 18:54:35 +0100 > Examples ... I need examples (no longer have a dumb analog capture card or > JPEG capture cared). The smallest sample I could create gives reproducably: $ qttoy4m test.mov | mpeg2enc -f 8 -b 5150 -q 4 -r 32 -g 3 -G 15

Re: [Mjpeg-users] cvs HEAD mpeg2enc: still random quant amplitudes

2008-02-04 Thread Christian Ebert
* Andrew Stevens on Sunday, February 03, 2008 at 18:54:35 +0100 > Christian, quantisation up to 60 almost certainly a Bug someplace. Can you > put a section of your source video someplace online so I can download > reproduce the problem reliably? See below. >>> mpeg2enc -f 8 -b 5150 -q 4 -r 3

Re: [Mjpeg-users] cvs HEAD mpeg2enc: still random quant amplitudes

2008-01-31 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 18:43:28 +0100 > If you post your command, I can try to reproduce it here with the videos > I have. mpeg2enc -f 8 -b 5150 -q 4 -r 32 -g 3 -G 15 -4 1 -2 1 -D 10 -K tmpgenc -o test.m2v Same with default matrix though. > I'm just running my

[Mjpeg-users] cvs HEAD mpeg2enc: still random quant amplitudes

2008-01-31 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi, While excited that there's progress on the mpeg2enc front, unfortunately I have to report that there are still overly high amplitudes in quantisation (up to 60) in p-frames. Or is this intended? Seems to work well with a 10 sec sample, but for after a few minutes I get this behaviour -- have

Re: [Mjpeg-users] workaround (PPC) for mpeg2enc's buggyness

2008-01-17 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 at 20:34:09 -0800 > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Christian Ebert wrote: >> But I'd like to decode with lav2yuv, but it segfaults here on dv movs > > Works fine here - BUT I have seen the problem you mentioned earlier > (symptom is

Re: [Mjpeg-users] workaround (PPC) for mpeg2enc's buggyness

2008-01-16 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 at 09:40:42 -0800 > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Mark Heath wrote: >> Anyway I've been using the mpeg2 encoder in ffmpeg and have been I get buffer underflows for longer stuff when encoding from dv to mpeg2 for dvd with ffmpeg, and i really played aroun

Re: [Mjpeg-users] workaround (PPC) for mpeg2enc's buggyness

2008-01-15 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi Steve, * Steven M. Schultz on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 at 13:10:30 -0800 > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Christian Ebert wrote: [...] >>>> BTW. is there a way to get the Luma Correction (gamma2.2) from >>>> mjpegtools (I'm encoding QuickTime files edited with Fina

Re: [Mjpeg-users] workaround (PPC) for mpeg2enc's buggyness

2008-01-15 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi Steve, * Steven M. Schultz on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 at 08:10:24 -0800 > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Christian Ebert wrote: > >> Hm, I played around a bit with the demo and am not convinced. > > I've done a lot more than play around with the demo and I

Re: [Mjpeg-users] workaround (PPC) for mpeg2enc's buggyness

2008-01-15 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Friday, March 23, 2007 at 00:48:14 -0700 > If you're using a PPC and OS/X there is a fantastically high quality > workaround for mpeg2enc's current buggy state. > > The BitVice encoder from: > >http://www.innobits.com/ > > works _great_. Not all the inner tweeking cap

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc is feeling better

2007-11-01 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Thursday, November 01, 2007 at 23:13:04 -0700 >>> mpeg2enc that restore (or should restore ;)) normal operation >>> and produce non corrupted video. >> >> Great! > > Well, I thought so too at first. > > But look at the "q=" lines! If you're seeing "q=18" or so then > ther

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc is feeling better

2007-11-01 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Thursday, November 01, 2007 at 12:55:23 -0700 > The author/maintainer of mpeg2enc has obtained a modicum of > development/free time and has checked in, today, changes to > mpeg2enc that restore (or should restore ;)) normal operation > and produce non corrupted video. Great

Re: [Mjpeg-users] yuvdeinterlace bug?

2007-09-19 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Thursday, September 13, 2007 at 20:49:06 -0700 > On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Stan Gammons wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 19:29 -0700, Steven M. Schultz wrote: >>> You should be able to fetch the CVS version - just ignore the mpeg2enc >>> executable (save your old one). >> >> Bette

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc

2007-09-12 Thread Christian Ebert
* Stan Gammons on Tuesday, September 11, 2007 at 20:44:12 -0500 > Is the CVS version of mpeg2enc still broken? Unfortunately, yes. I wish I had the knowledge to contribute, as IMO it still gives results superior to eg. ffmpeg. So I have to refrain to just keep my fingers crossed that work on it

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Mixing old and new recordings

2007-04-01 Thread Christian Ebert
* Anne Wilson on Saturday, March 31, 2007 at 17:55:10 +0100: > At the moment I just use > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is the the track? > > How do I make a top level menu? I haven't done this myself (yet), but perha

Re: [Mjpeg-users] workaround (PPC) for mpeg2enc's buggyness

2007-03-23 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Friday, March 23, 2007 at 00:48:14 -0700: > If you're using a PPC and OS/X there is a fantastically high quality > workaround for mpeg2enc's current buggy state. > > The BitVice encoder from: > > http://www.innobits.com/ > > works _great_.

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc.1: quantisation or quantization that is the question

2006-07-06 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Wednesday, July 05, 2006 at 21:30:15 -0700: >> mpeg2enc.1 gives wrong long option names. AFAIK both >> quantization/quantize and quantisation/quantise are correct >> spellings; but as practice and > > > I think the correct fix would have been to remove the -Q option ;

[Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc.1: quantisation or quantization that is the question

2006-07-05 Thread Christian Ebert
Hello, mpeg2enc.1 gives wrong long option names. AFAIK both quantization/quantize and quantisation/quantise are correct spellings; but as practice and $ mpeg2enc -h 2>&1 | grep quanti --quantisation|-q num Image data quantisation factor [1..31] (1 is best quality, no default) When quantis

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [CVS head] mpeg2enc produces broken output

2006-06-28 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 at 08:22:54 -0700: > mpeg2enc is broken. Not any more it seems. At least at first glance I am getting good results (again). > Fellow who tends mpeg2enc started to check in the changes for > the quasi-2pass encoding and then a crisis

Re: [Mjpeg-users] [CVS head] mpeg2enc produces broken output

2006-06-27 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Tuesday, June 27, 2006 at 08:22:54 -0700: > mpeg2enc is broken. > > Fellow who tends mpeg2enc started to check in the changes for > the quasi-2pass encoding and then a crisis at work came up Oh dear. > and he's been unavailable to debug/fix mpeg2enc

[Mjpeg-users] [CVS head] mpeg2enc produces broken output

2006-06-27 Thread Christian Ebert
Hello, Sorry for the vague subject, but I have no idea what's going on. I am trying latest CVS on MacOS 10.3.9. The following did "just work" up to now (and does with mjpegtools-1.8.0 which I downloaded and installed for comparison): $ ffmpeg -i TEST.mov -an -f yuv4mpegpipe -y - | mpeg2enc -f 8

[Mjpeg-users] anytovcd.sh and y4mscaler (was: Framerate not specified when using -n p)

2006-04-16 Thread Christian Ebert
* Bernhard Praschinger on Sunday, April 16, 2006 at 05:50:31 +0200: > Have you taken a look at the anytosvcd.sh script ? > It converts any fromat ffmpeg can decode to mpeg 1/2/vcd/svcd/dvd. I > might be worth looking at it. You find the current version in the CVS > (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewc

Re: [Mjpeg-users] No B frames in GOP structure

2006-04-07 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Thursday, April 06, 2006 at 11:03:49 -0700: > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Christian Ebert wrote: >> What about -H|--keep-hf ? Supposing I just want highest quality? > > I think it would be a good idea to define "highest quality" ;) Oops,

Re: [Mjpeg-users] No B frames in GOP structure

2006-04-06 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Wednesday, April 05, 2006 at 11:31:29 -0700: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote: > Let's play "find the be incorrect options" game :) ok :) >> 1 -V 1853 -s -D 1 0 -g 6 -G 15 -I 1 -b 9800 -D 10 -f 8 -o $1 Does -g 3 make sense in case one has high motion scenes? >

Re: [Mjpeg-users] No B frames in GOP structure

2006-04-06 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Wednesday, April 05, 2006 at 16:59:50 -0700: > On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Nicolas wrote: >> OK. The problem is that I don't know which options are set when using -f 8. > > The important ones ;) All you should need to specify is the '-q' > and perhaps a bitrate. What a

[Mjpeg-users] Obsolete header in lavtool's Makefile.in

2006-03-19 Thread Christian Ebert
Hello *, With latest CVS compiling failed due to missing lav2wav.h. I browsed the CVS-logs and from what I understand lav2wav.h has become obsolete. At least compiling works here on MacOS 10.3.9 with the following diff: --- lavtools/Makefile.in.orig 2006-02-09 17:14:31.0 +0100 +++ lavto