Re: [Mjpeg-users] Sound problem

2004-09-03 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo > I tried recompiling my kernel without pre-emption, but it made no difference. > I've left it off for the time being. I tried recompiling the mjpegtools, and > that made no difference. I've had the mjpegtools working fine on this machine > previously using the OSS, as opposed to ALSA which

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Sound problem

2004-09-03 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Derek Fountain wrote: > that made no difference. I've had the mjpegtools working fine on this machine > previously using the OSS, as opposed to ALSA which it now uses, so I tried > pulling ALSA out and putting the deprecated OSS drivers back in. I got into > kernel module d

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Sound problem

2004-09-03 Thread Derek Fountain
I tried recompiling my kernel without pre-emption, but it made no difference. I've left it off for the time being. I tried recompiling the mjpegtools, and that made no difference. I've had the mjpegtools working fine on this machine previously using the OSS, as opposed to ALSA which it now uses,

Re: [Mjpeg-users] JPEG-MMX compile errors

2004-09-03 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Derek Fountain wrote: > > next easiest thing would be to edit the Makefile and change the -O flag. > > I tried that first and it spat out more errors. No further effort in that > direction! Really? That's strange - when I encountered the same (undefined sy

Re: [Mjpeg-users] JPEG-MMX compile errors

2004-09-03 Thread Derek Fountain
> The next easiest thing would be to edit the Makefile and change the > -O flag. I tried that first and it spat out more errors. No further effort in that direction! > > A self complied mjpegtools performs exactly the same as the SUSE complied > > ones, with all the same problems for me. So at

Re: [Mjpeg-users] JPEG-MMX compile errors

2004-09-03 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Derek Fountain wrote: > Actually I didn't realise the Sourceforge mailing list archives were > searchable! I looked back through several pages of posts, then tried Google, Oh, ok. > option! Obvious when you see it, but those SF pages are so cluttered... In

Re: [Mjpeg-users] JPEG-MMX compile errors

2004-09-03 Thread Derek Fountain
> Have you searched the mailinglist archives? This has come up several > times. Actually I didn't realise the Sourceforge mailing list archives were searchable! I looked back through several pages of posts, then tried Google, but came up with nothing. It wasn't until I read your post, then ch

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Capture problem on SUSE-9.1

2004-09-03 Thread Derek Fountain
> I had some problems with SuSE precompiled binaries on a 9.0 distribution. > After recompiling the sources (from MJPEG-tools web site!) the problems > disappeared. It works well both under 2.4.x and 2.6.x. I am not sure if > this helps in your case because I am using bttv for capturing. Yes, SUSE

[Mjpeg-users] Support for Fast Card

2004-09-03 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo I have got a Fast AV Master, card. That card is using some well known IC's like SAA7187, ZR36050 for the video. And some less (at least for me) known IC's: ADSP-2105, SAA7187, ZR36015, Philips SAA 7145, Fast Viola. For the Audio there is on the card a: AD1843 Does anybody know of a linux

Re: [Mjpeg-users] JPEG-MMX compile errors

2004-09-03 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Derek Fountain wrote: > I thought I'd try to compile the MJPEG tools from source, rather than relying > on the SUSE-9.1 supplied versions. I downloaded JPEG-MMX-0.1.5 from > Sourceforge and did the './configure' and 'make' as described in the > mjpegtools README. I get this

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Compile on Suse 64 bit

2004-09-03 Thread Ronald S. Bultje
Hi, On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 10:18, Michael Steinhauser wrote: > I tried to install mjpegtools 1.6.2 on Suse 9.1 x86_64. [..] > ../utils/libmjpegutils.a(mjpeg_logging.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can > not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > ../utils/libmjpegutils.a: could not

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Sound problem

2004-09-03 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo > Further to my video capture problem just reported in another post, I'm also > having a problem with the captured sound. The sound card in this box is an > ancient ISA SB16 card which I've used happily with the tools for years. This > is the first time I've tried it with the 2.6.x kernel th

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Offtopic: archival safe CD/DVD labelling

2004-09-03 Thread Dan Scholnik
On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 11:48, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > In one of the video magazines I subscribe to there was an article > that was very emphatic about not using "Sharpie" (or other permanent > marking pens) because the acid based inks would erode the top surface > and caus

Re: [Mjpeg-users] More on the 'disks that won't play'

2004-09-03 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 02 Sep 2004 23:30, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Anne Wilson wrote: > > I've just had a message from the dvdauthor list, and wonder if there's a > > connection. > > And I just posted a reply back to that list ;) Shou

[Mjpeg-users] Compile on Suse 64 bit

2004-09-03 Thread Michael Steinhauser
I tried to install mjpegtools 1.6.2 on Suse 9.1 x86_64. I ran configure with --enable-libsuffix=64 and got no errors. When I typed make, the following error was reportet: /snap lib/x86_64-suse-linux/3.3.3/crtendS.o /usr/lib64/gcc-lib/x86_64-suse-linux/3.3.3/../../../../lib64/crtn.o -Wl,-soname

[Mjpeg-users] JPEG-MMX compile errors

2004-09-03 Thread Derek Fountain
I thought I'd try to compile the MJPEG tools from source, rather than relying on the SUSE-9.1 supplied versions. I downloaded JPEG-MMX-0.1.5 from Sourceforge and did the './configure' and 'make' as described in the mjpegtools README. I get this error: gcc -o djpeg djpeg.o wrppm.o wrgif.o wrtar