enc0 is a virtual interface for ipsec traffic. See the enc(4) man
page for details.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Johan Beisser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You know ssh will compress what goes through its tunnel to begin with, right?
ssh_config(5) says Compression defaults to "no".
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you use ssh -C it'll compress
I know, but I understood "ssh will compress what goes through its
tunnel to begin with" to imply this is the default behavior. Maybe
Johan meant "can" instead of "will."
I want to get an OpenBSD baby doll T-shirt, but currently the store
has only one design and only in L and XL. Has there been any
consideration to make more in the future (new designs or even just
another run of the existing design)?
On Mon, Nov 5, 2007 at 12:26 PM, Brian A Seklecki (Mobile)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - PIX/ASA has proprietary serial console fail-over (which is marginally
> faster than waiting for CARP)
Assuming this is really a problem, could CARP use interface link state
to speed up fail-over? E.g., if
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Problem is, a carp interface is not interested in the state of the
> syncdev, it is interested in the state of its own carpdev (since
> multiple carp interfaces on a machine are independent). And carpdev
> usually fa
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I think what you really want is to connect to the global IPv6
> internet. For this you will need IP space (or simply an address) from
> your current ISP or from a tunnelbroker. Contact your ISP and ask them
> f
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fwB's slave carp interfaces notice the "watchdev" going down and
> go to master. great, now we have two masters. as I have had such a
> split brain config in the fast (due to a switch misconfiguration) I can
> tell you
I setup hoststated earlier this week to provide load balancing and
fail over for a few Linux web servers. It went fairly smoothly,
except that one of the Linux machines only passed the 'check http "/"
code 200' test about 50% of the time. Just using 'check tcp' worked
fine, and I saw the same res
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Protocol Six Consulting
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I tell others about OpenBSD I can easily tell them what I like, but I
> was also curious what sort of ("verifiable") factoids folks here highlight
> when advocating for OpenBSD.
You should just take some fr
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Denis Doroshenko
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> google quickly gives a url
>
> http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_80_6180.shtm
>
> where it is said "It is likely an artifact of having
> tcp_tw_recycle and tcp_tw_reuse enabled in the
> sysctl settings."
Okay?
The p
Is anyone working on adding pf monitoring support for snmpd (e.g.,
porting OPENBSD-PF-MIB.txt)? I would find it convenient to at least
be able to monitor simple PF statistics (such as the output from
'pfctl -s info') over SNMP. (I'll work on a patch, but I want to
avoid redundant efforts if someo
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Parvinder Bhasin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I disable IPv6 in openbsd 4.x (3 - in my case) without recompiling
> kernel?
Unless your network is misconfigured, in your use case there's no
problem. Your machine will detect it has no routes for IPv6 unicast
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Parvinder Bhasin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 2 webservers on my internal lan. Both have associated EXTERNAL IPs.
> I setup an OpenBSD box with PF to do firewalling and redirection. Do I also
> have to put the 2 external IPs on the external interface of my
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Markus Bergkvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to have PF redirecting traffic based on sub-domains? I.e. I
> want traffic to a.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine 'a and traffic to
> b.mydomain.nu to be redirected to machine 'b'.'
Only if each of
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bind is no longer listening on udp 127.0.0.1.53.
Are you basing this conclusion on something other than the absence of
the word "LISTEN" on the UDP lines? (UDP sockets are stateless, so
netstat doesn't print anything out f
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering around, is there any multicasting technology (PIM-SM, PIM-SSM
> etc) currently developed or implemented in OpenBSD?
There's dvmrpd and mrouted.
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jeffrey Thunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For many years I've used OpenBSD on "older" hardware for my
> home firewall/router. Now I have need of (another) network switch and
> rather than buy one, I'd like to make my own using old Sun hardware
> and OpenBSD.
You
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Mark Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My fallback is to use a linux
> machine with minicom but I wondered if OpenBSD can do this.
Is minicom's xmodem support tied to Linux? OpenBSD's ports tree has
comm/minicom.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Jeremy Karlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Starting Howl in debug mode
> seems to indicate that it's sending the multicast packets to somewhere I
> can't explain - 224.0.0.251.
224.0.0.251 is the multicast address for mDNS.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried pulling it out?
I think iwi(4) is only Mini-PCI, so removing it's not any easier than
rebooting. :-)
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Alex Brodsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The latency for a single request is around 400ms +/- 2ms, even if both
> client and server are running on the same host, and the binding address is
> 127.0.0.1.
How are you measuring the latency?
> Any suggestions where t
What's considered the current 'best practice' for following OpenBSD
src with git? I'm interested in trying out git for managing my
growing list of pending/WIP patches for the src tree, but there seem
to be a bunch of options and I don't know if there's any preference
between them.
It looks like u
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Dominguez, Roland
wrote:
> I just came across this article and was wondering if it's legit:
>
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/OpenBSD-forked-to-create-Bitrig-161695
> 4.html
"They also plan to port libc++ and the compiler-rt runtime library in
order to rem
Committed, thanks!
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Scott McEachern
wrote:
> On 06/18/12 14:44, Scott McEachern wrote:
>>
>> $ diff mv.1.new mv.1
>> 79c79
>> < when the respective destination path is a non-empty directory,
>> ---
>> > when the respective destination path is a non-empy directory,
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Aaron W. Hsu wrote:
> Is there still any active
> effort to move the code base of OpenBSD away from GCC dependence?
There's some grassroots effort to make Clang a viable option, but
nothing super organized at the moment.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> didn't even bother; e.g., comparing nm
> outputs
Er, what are you expecting to divine by comparing nm output?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Tony Sidaway wrote:
> Summary: I want to turn my main system into a semi-automatic follower
> of "-current" and I think this strategy may useful to the project. Is
> this something that is already being done?
That's more or less what the snapshot process is, excep
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
> all of the calls in syscalls.master map to a unique function, and all
> of them start with sys_. it's true that nm won't tell me about
> argument changes. i just risk it a little by assuming no one's that
> evil
Okay, granted nm will tell yo
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Coming back and checking the thread, allow me to start laughing
> *REALLY HARD* at this, since I've seen no other comments on it. The
> ability to lock your hardware with libc and glibc errors is only
> exceeded by the kernel itself, and
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> Is it going to go the route of the mac68k port too?
I can't comment on macppc, but mac68k went away because the hardware
is obnoxious to support (e.g., interrupt priorities are backwards) and
because it was the only shared object archite
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:37 AM, cody chandler
wrote:
> Talk about learning C Programming and the K&R book being a good one. Is
> this the book?
>
> http://www.amazon.com/C-Programming-Language-2nd-Edition/dp/0131103628
Yes.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> yes it is, and i am surprised it is ~ $50. it is such a small book.
FWIW, you can read the C specification drafts online for free:
C89: http://flash-gordon.me.uk/ansi.c.txt
C99: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1124.pdf
C11
Sorry, this is a known issue. See my posts to ports@:
http://marc.info/?t=13404366491&r=1&w=2
Summary is it's an issue due to base and package snapshots being out
of sync at the moment.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
> I am getting the following error when trying to
This looks similar to the pppoe(4) bug that stsp fixed last year:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=130288210121749&w=2
Seems to me like sppp_clear_ip_addresses() needs the same workq
treatment that sppp_set_ip_addresses() received.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 8:22 AM, RD Thrush wrote:
> I made a
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Pablo Velasco Fernández
wrote:
> Hi. I was loolong the FreeBSD web page. And its a cool page with a cool
> desing. Maybe OpenBSD should change their own page to a most "visual" web
> page. ( Its only my opinion ) What do you think?
The FAQ could definitely use som
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Pablo Velasco Fernández
wrote:
> I mean.. A modern style.
Honestly, because it's just not a high priority. The OpenBSD website
is very information dense and its maintained by people who care a lot
about the information being accurate and useful and not as much ab
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> I'd prefer the (small) team of developers to work on the code.
Well, that's a false dichotomy: not all OpenBSD committers work on the
code. A handful work primarily on maintaining the website and/or
documentation, because that's an important job too.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Alvaro Mantilla Gimenez
wrote:
> Really? Can we do that?
Yes. There's no filters in place on the mailing list to prevent
people from submitting diffs, but there's also no guarantee that just
because you send in a diff that it'll be committed either.
If someone's
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Here's something I think would be a *major* improvement. Fix
> magicpoint to export slides in a format better than jpg.
Or extend mandoc to support Comic Sans so it can be used for
presentation slide decks!
[At the risk of starting yet another flame war...]
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Ryan McBride wrote:
> It's not critical because they can change the state table implementation
> later - OpenBSD has reorganised this several times with more planned -
> but we've put quite a bit of effort into re
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> I did this rather fast hoping to get it in for someone I know who is being
> used for a DNS amplifier attack but the final tests broke the hope of
> stopping it with this.
Tangential, but setting "max-udp-size 512" in BIND will limit how
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Brian W. wrote:
> I think tcp is only used for really large transfers,
Really large transfers... like DNSSEC. D'oh.
> which a non malicious user wouldn't need.
Agreed. DNSSEC today is way more useful for malicious users than
non-malicious ones because amplific
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 1:52 PM, wrote:
> Is there a reason why dwm isnt in OpenBSD base installation?
Maintaining software in base is more effort than maintaining it in the
ports tree, so there needs to be a good reason to go through that
extra effort. What's wrong with just installing it via
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Boutros Halingrad
wrote:
> Problem is, the only address that get added to the table is
> that of the sending server.
Right, sys/net/pf.c is hardcoded to use only the source address for
the overload table. (Search for "overload_tbl" to see the relevant
code.)
>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:45 AM, [B&G-Consulting] Elmar Bschorer
wrote:
> What sun sparc machine do you exactly need? What do you mean with "ss20"?
SS20 stands for SPARCstation 20: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARCstation_20
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Bernd wrote:
> I could provide shell access to a SS20 with 256MByte RAM and two 75MHz
> SuperSPARC II CPUs.
The workload for the snapshot and ports build machines really requires
full, local access.
In vmt_tick() we could notice anytime the reported sensor value jumps
significantly and then wind forward the clocks like we do when
recovering from ACPI sleep.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> I have an OpenBSD guest running in vmware player on my laptop. My
> problem is t
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> tc_setclock - doesn't seem to do much itself. What are the
> consquences of timehands->th_offset getting raced?
Racing calls to {micro,nano,bin}time() can get bogus times (e.g.,
interrupts or even other userspace threads that call clock_getti
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:23 AM, John Long wrote:
> +.Pa http://www.openbsd.org/faq .
mdoc(7) says Lk should be used for hyperlinks, though we don't
actually do that in any of our manuals currently. I think it would be
nice to start doing so though so that HTML and PDF formatted manual
pages can
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:19 AM, ropers wrote:
> Why is Pa only found in the MACRO REFERENCE section of mdoc(7) and not
> in the MACRO OVERVIEW? Is it deprecated?
It's under the "Semantic markup for command line utilities" subsection.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Martijn Rijkeboer wrote:
> RSYNC_CMD="/usr/local/bin/rsync -v -n \
> --rsync-path='rsync sudo' \
This doesn't do what you think it does. The single quotes are getting
literally passed to rsync, they're not reinterpreted after $RSYNC_CMD
is interpolated.
This
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Tony wrote:
> Personally I'd love to make a fork and contribute back a ton of pull
> requests, mostly on the documentation side though.
What's easier/nicer about github's pull request than sending an email
with an enclosed diff?
I use git for a lot of my local dev
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:49 PM, wrote:
> So, I really do not understand the rationale of you
> accusing me of lying on the basis of one email
> (incidentally, my very first email to this list). Above all, I
> do not understand the aggressive tone...
For better or worse, that's the general attit
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Brian Empson wrote:
> The SSI I'm talking about would be defined as "making multiple separate
> machines appear as one single system with one single process space, a shared
> root filesystem, and shared virtual IP". Shared memory doesn't seem that
> important, exce
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:16 PM, m brandenberg wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, David Coppa wrote:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-system_image
>
> I... I... I can hear Theo's eyes roll from *3000* miles away!
Meh, I don't see anything inherently insecure about SSI, I just don't
think it's
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Jens A. Griepentrog
wrote:
> In contrast to 4.8 (GENERIC.MP) #335 or 4.9 (GENERIC.MP) #819 kernels
> the snapshot 4.9-current (GENERIC) #47 kernel does not recognize sd1 as
> boot disk even when the MO drive sd0 is empty. The system ends up in ddb
> mode without ha
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Does it work if you try booting with "boot bsd -a" and manually tell
> it to use sd1a as the root device?
And if so, please include the output of running disklabel on each of your disks.
Also, what version of boo
[+misc@, for users not subscribed to tech@]
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem
> superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more
> developer interest and active development.
>
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Russell Sutherland
wrote:
> Or is there an easier way to do this?
Maybe one gif(4) tunnel and then three vlan(4)s on top of that?
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Tom Murphy wrote:
> Could it be bad network cable or bad hardware?
I'm not sure the root cause of the watchdog timeout (*that* could be
due to bad hardware, I have no idea), but the panic at least is
because of a bad driver. That panic means the bnx(4) driver cal
I've been playing around occasionally with using Rietveld
(codereview.appspot.com) for doing OpenBSD code reviews and have
written up some rough notes on how to use it at
https://github.com/mdempsky/openbsd-stuff/blob/master/notes/codereview.txt.
(Feedback and suggestions welcome!)
As a quick exa
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Carson Chittom wrote:
> Can anybody point me in the right direction? I'll be glad to provide any
> additional information; I don't know what's relevant. A dmesg follows.
Set ddb.console=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf and reboot. Read ddb(4) to
figure out how to break in
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Leroy van Engelen
wrote:
> The laptop is a Samsung N210. Any idea what might be the problem, or how I
> might gather some more information?
Run "systat 1" and it'll show you a breakdown of interrupt counts
along the right hand side. The "clock" counter should be
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Dorian B|ttner
wrote:
> Actually gotten fingers on a somewhat powerful machine and I thought why
not
> test a snapshot on it.
> Leading is bsd with ps and trace, followed by bsd.sp which boots ok.
> Hope this is not a maloperation?
Looks like acpicpu(4) doesn't li
Does anyone still use mrouted(8) or is everyone using dvmrpd(8) now?
If you're still using mrouted(8), why?
If no one speaks up in defense of mrouted(8), I'm going to propose
that it be unlinked from the build after tree unlock. Currently the
userland-kernel interface for managing multicast routi
[-tech@]
I took a quick look. Most of their ARM offerings are based on either
ARM7TDMI or Cortex-M3, which are too low-end to run OpenBSD (though
devel/arm-elf may be useful for writing code to run on them).
The Cirrus EP93XX boards are possibly interesting since they actually
have MMUs, but the
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
> Hey, at least throw in that
>> /dev/sd0g on /usr/X11R6 type ffs (local, nodev)
>> /dev/sd0h on /usr/local type ffs (local, nodev)
>> /dev/sd0j on /usr/obj type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid)
>> /dev/sd0i on /usr/src type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid)
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
> Well, /usr/ports is updated, but never needs to be erased unless really
> messed up by user error
That's true of /usr/src too though, right?
I was curious if anyone had tried running OpenBSD on an Acer Aspire
EasyStore H340. I've been looking at home NAS gear lately, and it
seemed like a pretty nice solution (small, reasonable price, 4
hot-swappable toolless SATA bays): http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001WGX15W
I noticed that softraid's RAID 5 implementation uses the left
asymmetric layout, while I've only found (sparse/vague) documentation
suggesting symmetric layouts should be slightly better (namely, for an
N-disk array, every N consecutive data units will each be stored on a
different disk) without an
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Sure, but why?
>
> What are we gaining?
So to be clear, I wasn't as much saying softraid *should* switch. I
was just casually reading the code, saw the comment about "left
asymmetric layout", and so I started investigating what that meant
I installed a Blu-Ray drive into my OpenBSD desktop today (running May
13th amd64 snapshot) and have been playing around with it some.
However, somewhat regularly running "disklabel cd1" or "mount
/dev/cd1a /mnt" causes a kernel panic. I've seen it happen with both
DVDs and Blu-Rays, though I have
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> ahci_ata_cmd() at ahci_ata_cmd+0x10c
> ata_exec() at ata_exec+0xe
> scsi_xs_exec() at scsi_xs_exec+0x24
> scsi_xs_sync() at scsi_xs_sync+0x6f
I poked around a bunch at this, and have a bit more information to
report. Wi
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Chris wrote:
> I'm planning to buy a Thinkpad x201 laptop (not the tablet one) and
> wondering if anyone using it with OpenBSD at the moment. If so, is it
> 100% OpenBSD compatible?
I have an X201s and it works okay. The biggest thing that doesn't
*seem* to work
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Jens A. Griepentrog
wrote:
> What went wrong? The procedure works for usual hard disks and memory
> sticks with sectors of 512 bytes. I would be grateful for any hint.
> (As a final aim I would like to have some bootable magneto-optical
> disk with root partition a:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:58 AM, johhny_at_poland77
wrote:
> How can i enable this feature in Google Chrome/Chromium?
This isn't an OpenBSD question. I suggest asking on a Chrome mailing
list. You'll have better luck that way.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Markus Schatzl wrote:
> Are there any objections to re-integrate this new code into
> OpenBSD?
Depends on what the NetBSD code in question looks like. E.g., they
tend to be a bit more macro-happy than we are, but there's no
fundamental objection to integrating a
Does anyone use IPcomp and/or PPP-deflate? Would anyone be sad to see these go?
They seem pretty busted right now (e.g., no userspace support for
enabling IPcomp, and sys/net/zlib.c is broken on 64-bit arches), and
there's some doubt as to whether they're even worth the effort to fix.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
> I'm not sure if you were aware of
> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Apr/0? In any case, it might be
> worth looking into.
Yeah. There are multiple reasons why we're not particularly at risk:
1. We disable IPComp processing by d
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> For the time being, I'd suggest anyone concerned ensure ipcomp
> processing is disabled; i.e., make sure "sysctl
> net.inet.ipcomp.enable" is set to 0. (And like I said, it's disabled
> by default.)
I
There have been some changes to how checksums are handled in the
kernel (in particular with bridges), so I can believe this was
affected.
Try running "tcpdump -s 65535 -v udp port bootps or udp port bootpc"
on various interfaces on both the server and the clients. It should
warn if it sees bad ch
There was an issue with azalia in a recent snapshot that looks like is
affecting you. I believe it was reverted or fixed so you can try building a
new kernel or wait for a new snapshot.
On Apr 10, 2011 12:47 PM, "Joe Gidi" wrote:
> Running the latest snap of amd64 and I'm noticing the machine has
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Are you sure you want to do this. Do you want any ssl on these sites,
> because you'll need ugly :port on your ssl urls if you do.
Using Subject Alternative Names, you can get a single SSL certificate
that covers multiple hostnames.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Kevin Chadwick
> wrote:
>> Are you sure you want to do this. Do you want any ssl on these sites,
>> because you'll need ugly :port on your ssl urls if you do.
>
> Using S
What's going on here? Why am I seeing different return values when I
run 'cvs diff' against anoncvs.openbsd.org vs anoncvs.usa.openbsd.org?
What's the correct return value?
mdempsky@mdempsky:/usr/src/sys/sys$ echo hi >> swap.h
mdempsky@mdempsky:/usr/src/sys/sys$ cvs -d
anon...@anoncvs.usa.openbs
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> What's going on here? Why am I seeing different return values when I
> run 'cvs diff' against anoncvs.openbsd.org vs anoncvs.usa.openbsd.org?
> What's the correct return value?
Seems to
If anyone knows about a USB device that supports the "USB Attached
SCSI" protocol, I'd appreciate an email about it. You can verify that
a device supports this protocol by installing the usbutil package
(sysutils/usbutil in ports), running usbctl, and looking for an
interface descriptor with:
b
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Zamri Besar wrote:
> Just a question. www.openbsd.org not reachable via IPv6 network?
Does www.openbsd.org have any records?
No.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Amarendra Godbole
wrote:
> built the latest config as detailed in the current faq, and built the
> kernel. smooth. had a problem when i did a "config -ef /bsd", where
> config dumped core (~9M). did not find much here, so thought i'll
> quickly check. it is possibl
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:47:45PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Manuel GIRAUD
> wrote:
> > I'm experiencing a panic after an upgrade from yesterday's snapshot
> > (SHA256 (bsd.rd) =
> > d56181843c4355c64d84f8583e0946289ba0b2055b1ba194ce38cb28f725b29b)
> >
> > Everyth
As a heads up to all softraid(4) users, there's a known issue with a
softraid patch included in the Jun 5 snapshot kernels. In particular,
unsuccessful attempts to create a softraid logical disk using
bioctl(8) (i.e., "bioctl -c") can result in a kernel panic.
I encourage softraid(4) users to ski
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Michael Sioutis wrote:
> I am running Subsonic 4.4 over SSL, java 7 (jdk-1.7.0.00beta122), and
> tomcat 6.0.20 to stream music
> through a nice interface.
It would help if you also included what version of OpenBSD you're
using, preferably by including the output o
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:54 PM, John Danks wrote:
>> I'm seeing "re0: watchdog timeout" after the MSI change to the re
>> driver. Reverted the change and it stops.
>>
>> Unrelated but this machine pauses for a good 30 seconds on boot and
>
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Giridhari wrote:
> Is there much activity in porting OpenBSD to x64 architecture?
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Giridhari wrote:
> Excuse me please, I made a mistake. I meant 64bit Intel hardware.
Intel has multiple 64-bit architectures. If you don't know which one
you're asking about, then you most likely want
http://www.openbsd.org/amd64.html.
SCSI scanners are marked "obsolete" at least as of the latest SCSI
working drafts, and other than updates to keep in sync with other
kernel subsystem changes, ss(4) doesn't seem to have received any real
attention in about a decade.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Predrag Punosevac
wrote:
> I discovered very quickly by reading
> sane-backends man pages that support for several of HP SCSI model is
> just a cheap hack which works only on Linux (driver expect device names,
> driver names to be Linux).
That's disappointing to h
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:55:48PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
>> That's disappointing to hear. :-(
>
> sane != ss
Right. I mean it's disappointing just the same that sane wasn't
working for his scann
speak up now if
you're still using it.
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 03:02:10PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Still waiting to hear back from someone on this diff. Can anyone at
> least confirm that ioprbs(4) is still being used?
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:48:03AM -0700, Matthew
101 - 200 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
