[+misc@, for users not subscribed to tech@] On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Matthew Dempsky <matt...@dempsky.org> wrote: > What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem > superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more > developer interest and active development. > > Are there any users still using ccd(4) and/or raid(4) and unable to > upgrade to softraid(4)? Will anyone be up a creek if ccd(4)/raid(4) > were removed?