On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Kenneth R Westerback <kwesterb...@rogers.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:55:48PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote: >> That's disappointing to hear. :-( > > sane != ss
Right. I mean it's disappointing just the same that sane wasn't working for his scanners, even if it's probably not related to ss(4).
