think it is doing
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
Obviously you don’t need to restart the daemon to pickup new aliases.
If you are using a plain file aliases map it can be reloaded atomically at
runtime using smtpctl.
If you are using a db file, it can be rebuilt using the newaliases / makemap
utility.
I can’t tell you which one to use because
;
> table aliases file:/etc/mail/aliases
> listen on lo0
> accept for local alias deliver to mbox
> accept from local for any relay
>
> Regards.
> --
> ~ajitabhpandey
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, sharon s. wrote:
> At some point.. birthdays stop being happy. only speaking from
> experience.. :)
>
that reads like an early stage of depression ?
you may want to M-x doctor ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.
less delivery method to being easier to manage as an admin.
That being said: no, no, no, * because I'm curious.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ooks like and there
is no chance it can make it before 6.3
I have a big interest in this working so this is among my top prio work.
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
But it's quite a big change, and we can't
> > give an
> > ETA right now.
>
> what about defining a new name in DNS containing addresses of all
> smarthosts as a workaround for the OP for now?
>
This can work in some use-cases, this is exactly what a co-worker did to
work around the limitation.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:47:27PM +0200, Christian Gut wrote:
>
> > On 2.Aug. 2017, at 14:09, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 01:47:09PM +0200, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> >> * Eric Faurot [2017-08-02 13:24]:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 02, 201
pt from any for domain [...]
accept from any for domain foobar.org [...]
with:
accept from any for any [...]
you will match all envelopes so you're essentially creating a catch-all.
virtual happens AFTER a rule has been matched so if you recipient is not
found the
but, usually, having the "from any for any"
rule in a config file is a sign that user failed to write ruleset and is
using this as a fallback. The earliest the rules match the envelope, the
better, as it indicates that the rule was written to match precisely.
Most rulesets should finish w
1.22
> +++ usr.sbin/ypldap/parse.y 19 Aug 2017 20:15:33 -
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ port : PORT STRING
> {
> free($2);
> }
> | PORT NUMBER {
> - if ($2 <= 0 || $2 >= (int)USHRT_MAX) {
> + if ($2 <= 0 || $2 > (int)USHRT_MAX) {
> yyerror("invalid port: %lld", $2);
> YYERROR;
> }
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
how we fought feature creep. I don't think you would
have a much simpler code path if you used OpenSMTPD or added server code
in front of this new SMTP client to allow enqueuing.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
7/27/2017, and the last github release seems to be
> 201601072302 (although the openbsd port appears to be 201703132115, I
> guess it's not downloading it from github?).
>
It's been a while since the last -extras release indeed,
I suppose the openbsd port pulls from github,
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:19:47PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 06:13:23PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > So I recently converted my opensmtpd server to use ldap as the backend
> > for user authentication. It seems it's a bit untol
s well much safer, removed a lot of
very unpleasant side-effects most people didn't even realize existed ...
until they hit that one case for which we had no way to work around.
Anyways,
looking forward for you to test and report how it works for you :-)
-
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 04:38:17PM -0400, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 14:18, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > In effect, instead of having:
> > accept from any for local deliver to mbox
> >
> > You will have:
> > action "my_action&
nder for any relay
no longer matches authenticated users
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > Could someone tell me if my changes below are OK. :-)
> > >
> > >
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:15:00PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > > On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:27:21AM -0400, Amelia A Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:15:00 +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On 15:14 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> >>> On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 09:37:07PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 03:58:59PM +0300, Consus wrote:
> > On 14:31 Fri 25 May, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > &g
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:45:40AM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > From: Gilles Chehade
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 1:20 PM
> >
> > That's bad but could easily be fixed if you want to help us
>
> So I dropped in the latest table-ldap from git, and it s
x sugar too.
action foobar maildir = action foobar mda "/usr/libexec/mail.maildir ..."
action foobar maildir path = action foobar mda "/usr/libexec/mail.maildir
path ..."
lmtp is not easy, it requires multiple parameters and people have a lot
of different use-cases with it. I can't easily provide a syntaxic sugar
and we must expose -d, -f, rcpt-to, etc... this isn't acceptable for me
so if you manage to make all options fit in one STRING I will be ok but
if I have to add keywords specific I won't.
Something like:
> > > action "lmtp-local" lmtp "/var/dovecot/lmtp"
would be fine by me, but people are using other parameters than just the
lmtp socket, or maybe we can provide a syntaxic sugar for this case, and
people using any other option must use the longer option ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
buy a new one if only Steve Jobs would be alive and keeping
>>
>> Apple
>>> inspired. The new models are meticulously designed to make you
>>
>> suffer:
>>> expensive, slow cpu, soldered ram, soldered disk, small disk, bad
>>
>> keyboard
>>> keys, wifi only, must pay extra for standard connectors.
>>>
>>> I have 1500EUR for a new laptop. What would you buy with it?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
rocmail".
If you're running current, you might want to try:
"|exec /usr/local/bin/procmail -f %{mbox.from} || exit 75"
in case it helps procmail produce a correct sender.
Can you provide me with the corrupt line procmail includes so I can
check if it is invalid indeed ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 12:25:55PM +0200, d.rausch...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
>
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 01:25:46PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Can you provide me with the corrupt line procmail includes so I can
> > check if it is invalid indeed ?
>
> Th
on.
>
That is exactly the case.
I have a non-invasive implementation of filters which I'm happy with and
which I intend to commit shortly after OpenBSD 6.4 is tagged, so we have
a full release cycle to work on details, keywords and such, in order for
the feature to be production ready for 6.5.
handling only some exit codes as tempfail
and all others as permfail.
diff going to the tree in a minute, tested by Atanas ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ime.
>
> But you're right in principle -- I *should* really take the time out to
> recreate the list of domains that went into it and just re-generate with
> smtpctl spf walk something like once per day or once per week.
>
Like this ?
https://github.com/Mailbrix/lists
:-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
is would be something like:
action relay_00 relay mail-from "@foobar.org"
match [...] action relay_00
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
if it contains a positive X-Spam
> header.
>
>
> spams detected by spamassassin have multiple X-Spam-* headers, but aren't
> placed
> into Junk folder.
>
> Any advice ?
>
without seeing examples of these headers and your config,
>
> I guess the "junk" keyword in smtpd.conf was written to be handy, so I miss
> something. Where ?
>
You didn't miss anything, the maildir agent only supports X-Spam headers
as of today so this will need a diff to support SpamAssassin if it can't
generate a X-Spam header.
SpamAssassin wasn't a target when I wrote that feature but it's just one
diff away ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 09:21:46PM +0100, Thuban wrote:
> * Gilles Chehade le [21-11-2018 21:06:39 +0100]:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:38:43PM +0100, Thuban wrote:
> > > * Edgar Pettijohn le [21-11-2018 11:32:43
> > > -0600]:
> > > >
> &g
It's interesting to have instruction for generating self-signed cert but
most people will want a cert that others will validate so it makes sense
to at least extend the man page (in another diff) in my opinion.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
htt
unless you provide the full configuration file and some logs, this is
not enough to even begin to understand what happened.
on the top of my head: you're not matching the rule you think you are
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
many site
that people started telling me in private that a psycho had a grudge
against us.
At least be honest about your motives.
You told me once that you were a "security expert" and that we could
sit around a beer so you'd tell me what's wrong in our design. If it
is true that you want the project to succeed and if you really are a
security expert then the project would have surely made a better use
of a design analysis report than this mail.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
hould use the 'recipient' keyword:
accept [...] for domain recipient [...]
Goal of aliases / virtual is to resolve a user-part/address into a
local delivery ... which makes no sense if your mail is not local.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
to use after
> it wad configure. (:<
>
> Oh well.
>
> I will switch back to makemap then.
>
> I hope I understand your explication as this being still valid:
>
> table vusers db:/etc/mail/vusers.db
> table vdomains db:/etc/mail/vdomains.db
>
yes, this is still valid
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
> 250 HELP
>
> I think I should see a "SMTPUTF8" extension in this list. Is that correct?
>
smtpd doesn't support SMTPUTF8 yet, correct.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
jor...@mydomain.ca
> postmas...@mydomain.cajor...@mydomain.ca
> webmas...@mydomain.ca jor...@mydomain.ca
> jor...@mydomain.cavmail
>
>
> *Dovecot starts without complaint with this config:*
>
>
> passdb {
> ar
indeed exist.
>
> Thanks for the fast response!
>
you need to install the opensmtpd-extras package from ports to use
the table-passwd add-on
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
2.7-config /usr/local/bin/python-config
> ln -sf /usr/local/bin/pydoc2.7 /usr/local/bin/pydoc
> # rcctl restart smtpd
> smtpd(ok)
> #
>
>
> On 01/23/18 01:31, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 01:21:22AM -0800, Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> > >
cause it's simple and you can easily set it up
from within a ~/.forward file rather than /etc/mail/aliases which has a
huge security benefit.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ribes the
envelope before the rule you're showing, then we will not be able to
understand the issue.
Also, "No MX could be reached" means that no MX willing to accept the
envelope could be reached. That can mean you have invalid credentials
and that none
ept for any alias relay via $av_origin
>
> # coming in from authed clients
> accept tagged $originating for any alias relay via $av_origin
>
Ok, there's a parse.y bug here that I'll be looking into.
You shouldn't be able to use "alias" in a relay rule, it is discarded.
What you want is to use local lmtp delivery, not lmtp relaying.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ch a 5.3.3 stable tarball from opensmtpd.org and it will
run on top of OpenBSD 5.3
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
> resolve the aliases, since it already passed through amavis.
>
There's a way but it's going to require you to edit the individual
envelopes either manually or through a script
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ain
than the one specified in mx. [...]
therefore:
accept for domain foobar.org relay backup mx2.example.org
will turn your machine as a backup mx for domain foobar.org with the
same priority as mx2.example.org, only relaying to other MXs that have
a higher priority
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:41:49PM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
> On 6/24/2013 1:23 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> >>>"relay backup" is used to setup secondary mail servers for a domain,
> >>>that is a server that accept mails for a domain and relay to M
t won't
take long before rbl and similar filters get implemented.
> Just switched over from Postfix. Couldn't be happier.
>
Glad to hear ;)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
(8) knows when it is invoked as "sendmail" and will work just the
way you'd expect. All you have to do is setup the mailwrapper(8) and you
can then let your ruby app config reference sendmail
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
by the troll, but it turned
> out that the whole sentence is missing from original interview.
>
> [0]
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2013/05/29/sharyl-attkisson-and-her-compromised-computers/
>
seriously, who fucking cares.
let this thread die
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
g/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/delivery_mbox.c.diff?r1=1.8;r2=1.9;f=h
I don't see how your issue could possibly happen with this code :-/
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
not available
> yet? Not a huge deal, I just would like to know so that I stop beating
> myself trying to get it to work.
>
summary:
For OpenSMTPD versions earlier than 5.3.3, it's correct to assume that.
For OpenSMTPD 5.3.3, it's a hidden feature
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:03:45PM +0100, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
> On 2013-09-25 Wed 11:39 AM |, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > It's officially still true, unofficially you can do it on recent
> > versions by declaring a table (i'll use a static table for the exa
ts/core.Techn0.eu.key"
> pki core.Techn0.eu dhparams "/etc/mail/certs/core.Techn0.eu.dh"
>
> [...]
>
can you try with an all-lowercase hostname ?
I think we're missing a call to lowercase() in our configuration parsing
and I'll have a fix for that in a few minu
p of each directive.
There's enough documentation on the web, including on postfix's site
to get you started in my opinion.
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
ow to report bugs, and look at the sendbug(1) man page.
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
Please, contribute to my happiness ;)
http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/wishlist/2O09ACKR1A8HD/
the monitor?
> > Otherwise, anybody can recommend me a card that will be able to run my
> > monitor
> > in the high resolution?
>
> Intel. or ATI (amd).
>
> Repeat after me:
> "I will not buy Nvidia"
> "I will not buy Nvidia"
> "
s nobody anyway?
>
> He's a french guy. I've seen him during p2k8 in Budapest ;-)
>
> (did anyone take a picture of him?)
>
I doubt that nobody is french ;)
--
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
Please, contribute t
heck, his site is at http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
>
> Please donate via paypal: gil...@poolp.org
>
Wow, someone actually noticed ;-)
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
Please, contribute to my happiness ;)
Janne Johansson a icrit :
Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
* Beavis (pfu...@gmail.com) wrote:
I would like to ask some folks here regarding hoststated is it
still available for OpenBSD?
hoststated is now called relayd, after being called hostated.
I think we should name it 'The daemon forme
imit the downtime, however they dealt very bad with it and didn't
follow the plans causing nearly two days of downtime. So I'd say they
are great if you don't have critical services running, and need to be
able to change infrastructure.
I've been at m5hosting for the last few months and so far they're way
better than what I've seen elsewhere. Maybe just a bit too expensive,
if you compare the hardware with what you can get elsewhere, but they
do seem to know what they're doing.
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
know about computers were freak, ugly,
> with big glasses who don't get a girlfriend in a life. Now, they sign
> posters as any rock star.
>
> Really, I can't realize why would anyone want a signature from an
> OpenBSD dev, A. Einstein, Leonardo da Vinci, Bono Vox, whoever.
>
maybe it sells on ebay ?
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
d_flags=""
to the /etc/rc.conf.local file.
Please, do not spam the list with reports of success or failure,
instead you can send them to: smtpd-...@poolp.org
Thanks !
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:31:18AM +0100, ropers wrote:
> 2009/3/17 Gilles Chehade :
>
> > http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
>
> So... what's the black-out stuff all about?
>
> I'm not up to date, it appears, and I don't understand French, and
> what I sa
L. V. Lammert a icrit :
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jose Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
hostname) or could it use a different HELO command when sending
mail from different dom
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 09:21:46PM +0100, Thuban wrote:
> * Gilles Chehade le [21-11-2018 21:06:39 +0100]:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:38:43PM +0100, Thuban wrote:
> > > * Edgar Pettijohn le [21-11-2018 11:32:43
> > > -0600]:
> > > >
> &g
xEm1K8sqrIraunJoXU1DeBwsRveIm9W8lQhrakOK5w/A
> > LP7NegSZljctRmTvLDkSwkgdR9mH18y/DFAjj+TlA3oLNB+EkKGRgBxuEddb
> > BgoAU+9+PSgpoAUGXeWGlp/Q0caUP7lM/VlovbBJF8l+1uEZtc1euwtw8fo/
> > +cxZXDiMzDbouZAvSqG/60E=
> > =5R2I
> > -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> >
> --
> Vijay
initated the connection:
$ spamdb | grep -E '^(GREY|WHITE)\|' | cut -d\| -f1,2
Do not spam misc@ with that output, send it directly to me.
Thanks !
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https:/
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:56:57PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> Hello Gilles,
>
> In article <20181221145201.ga90...@ams-1.poolp.org> Gilles Chehade
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 07:41:41AM -0700, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > > CVSROOT:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 01:14:54PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:59:58PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 06:56:57PM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> > > Hello Gilles,
> > >
> > > In a
quot;535 Authentication failed"
>
Hi,
First of all, it should read mask-src and not mask-source, otherwise the
auth keyword is assuming a table containing literal string "mask-source"
and this will cause authentication to fail.
A good method to troubleshoot, is to run smtpd in
hat you're doing
can you setup a temporary account, with a temporary password, authenticate to it
using a regular MUA (whichever you want, just don't auth manually), then trash
the account and send us logs that aren't doctored ?
> On January 14, 2019 9:41:42 AM GMT+01:00, Gilles C
t; send to external addresses, log:
> http://dpaste.com/2M8JMQC.txt
>
you need a rule that matches auth, for example:
match auth from any for any action "relay"
> On January 14, 2019 1:10:24 PM GMT+01:00, Gilles Chehade
> wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 01:03:19
cope, it can only expand it.
What you are describing has never existed in smtpd, there's never been
code to translate sender addresses and there's a good reason for that:
it not considered doable before the grammar change...
But sure, blame it on the grammar.
> (If anyone cares, the bad
you actually tried _nothing_ then blaming the
code improvements for a use-case that could have never worked because it
not only uses the wrong _documented_ mechanism but also because the code
to make your use-case work has never existed, kinds of irritates me.
I don't get royalties on s
t want to be "that asshole", although it seems I've succeeded again -
> sorry.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to reply. Now I'm going to go check that mail
> server a 7,000,000th time, this time to see what MTA is actually *running*,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 01:11:44AM +0100, Eric Elena wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:08:02 +0100 Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > I may sound a bit harsh, but starting a thread with "this is my last try
> > or I'll switch" (as if it actually matters) right before telling som
wn,
> - placed in a special directory on the VPS for my server to later ciphon
> down using `rsync --remove-source-files` over SSH. (Basically, a bit
> like UUCP.)
>
no custom mail transports in smtpd.
a way to achieve what you want is to write a custom mda, and this is
actually how i
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 09:23:37PM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> Hi Gilles,
> On 25/1/19 11:29 pm, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:15:47PM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
> >> First and foremost is the issue of backscatter-prevention. I would like
>
ocmail without introducing special cases and ugly hacks such as having
explicit search for the string 'procmail' in .forward files.
it wasn't worth it when people can just pass procmail an option.
also don't use procmail, it's trash and there are far better options for
you
searching (scratching my head) how
> to configure sendmail!?? A 4 line config file to have a functioning email
> configuration is pretty staggering!
>
Cheers :-)
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
direction. This was exactly what I
> was looking for.
>
glad it helps, though keep in mind that I'm writing about code that is on
my laptop or that's very very very fresh and likely to change.
we're nearly a year apart from that post and I can't even remember all of
the changes, fixes and improvements.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
google and
they are pretty much identical in terms of configuration.
--
Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg
https://www.poolp.org tip me: https://paypal.me/poolpOrg
hings to change in the API, and you should stay away
of it if you can't write code at the moment.
Some people already wrote a few useful filters and are using them daily,
so this is more than usable at this point, my plan is for the filter API
to be made rock-solid for 6
rypto
as I'm unable to reproduce with current smtpd and older libcrypto, and
able to reproduce with recent libcrypto.
I'm investigating this
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
event=failed-command address=119.141.24.19 host=119.141.24.19 command="RCPT
> TO:" result="550 Invalid recipient"
> Nov 26 06:06:56 server smtpd[55880]: 3bcc430eee258cd7 smtp
> event=failed-command address=119.141.24.19 host=119.141.24.19 command="RCPT
> TO:" result="550 Invalid recipient"
> Nov 26 06:06:57 server smtpd[55880]: 3bcc430eee258cd7 smtp event=closed
> address=119.141.24.19 host=119.141.24.19 reason=disconnect
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
more than
that to fix when they happen.
I can understand why someone would be reluctant to setup dmarc, but dkim
and spf are really a no brainer.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
key "/etc/ssl/my-domain.com.key"
>
> table aliases file:/etc/mail/aliases
>
> accept from any for domain "my-domain.com" alias deliver to mbox
> accept for local alias deliver to mbox
> accept from local for any relay
>
... is not allowed to
t; Is it about my server cert or the remote one?
>
remote one, it means that when trying to verify the certificate that was
presented by the remote server, the verification failed
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
hen an admin makes a config change,
(s)he can decide to reevalute or not some envelopes or not.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
"smtpctl
> show queue" output, pick field 1,5,6 and then refeed the output of
> "smtpctl show message field1" to "sendmail -f field5 -- field6" for
> each line. Then delete the stuck ones. (Yeah test that first.)
>
> Good luck.
>
> Hopefully it will get fixed.
>
As I wrote in the other mail, I think the proper fix is to provide admin
the right tool.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 02:13:46AM +0200, Liviu Daia wrote:
> On 28 November 2014, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:00:19PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> [...]
> > > No, it is not proper behavior. As a store and forward system with
> > >
of curiosity, why are you unhappy with the defaults ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
its for those two in order to escape
> "452 4.5.3 Too many recipients: Too many messages sent ???
>
> //mxb
>
> > On 8 dec 2014, at 11:14, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:00:50AM +0100, mxb wrote:
> >> Hello @list,
> >
backup
a full domain or specific untagged recipients.
This doesn't seem too hard to implement though, I'll see if I can get it
done this week.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
*p = '\0';
+ }
if (strcasecmp(m1.user, m2.user))
return 0;
+ }
return 1;
}
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
bility, 1400x1050
> > wsdisplay0 at machfb0 mux 1: console (std, sun emulation), using wskbd0
> > usb1 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0
> > uhub1 at usb1 "NEC OHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> > usb2 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0
> > uhub2 at usb2 "NEC OHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> > cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0
> > cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 1 device 0 cacheline 0x10, lattimer 0x20
> > pcmcia0 at cardslot0
> > vscsi0 at root
> > scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets
> > softraid0 at root
> > scsibus2 at softraid0: 256 targets
> > bootpath: /pci@1f,0/ide@d,0/disk@0,0
> > root on wd0a (66dd7746863e7550.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
> >
> > Max
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
It's slow as hell, I know (I own a 150). But it's cool (a sparc64 laptop!) :)
> :)
>
Yep, sparc64 laptop would be <3
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
1 - 100 of 507 matches
Mail list logo
