On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:51:34AM +0100, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > I mentioned this in other thread, now I'll ask this question directly. > > I was running my own mail server for a while but not enough to make a > conclusion. I'd appreciate the opinion of the experienced. > > I'm noticing messages with no spf or dkim records reach my gmail inbox. > At the same time, messages with spf and dkim 'pass' state go to gmail > spam (among them messages sent to me from people in this list). > > So, in general and based on your experience, do you think using dkim > (that implies daemon, port redirections, etc.) is really worth? >
Depends on your volume and who you intend to send to. To be honest, setting up both SPF and DKIM takes a couple minutes and it will probably avoid some delivery issues which will waste much more than that to fix when they happen. I can understand why someone would be reluctant to setup dmarc, but dkim and spf are really a no brainer. -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
