http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
Most likely the 8/13 change.
2013/9/18 Riccardo Mottola
> Hi,
>
> I have updated to a current snapshot (13 sept to be precise). The system
> starts up, but most of the application which I had installed from ports
> crash with a "bad system call". wmaker,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:37:49AM -0500, patric conant wrote:
> http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
>
> It supposed to be open-er. I didn't find a license, thought it might be of
> mild interest.
bitrig (OpenBSD fork) has ongoing work to intergrate
hammer filesystem from DragonflyBSD. If t
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Riccardo Mottola
wrote:
> I have updated to a current snapshot (13 sept to be precise). The system
> starts up, but most of the application which I had installed from ports
> crash with a "bad system call". wmaker, svn
> I thought we had binary compatibility a
for sure !
>
> From: Jiri B
> Sent: Wed Sep 18 09:12:58 CEST 2013
> To: patric conant
> Subject: Re: OpenZFS announcement
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:37:49AM -0500, patric conant wrote:
> > http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
> >
> > It supp
Hi assume that OpenZFS will continue to be CDDL-licensed, and just start
incorporating the changes that were developed for Illumos and FreeBSD
(zpool version 5000, etc). Nothing new here.
Bernd
On 9/18/13 7:37 AM, patric conant wrote:
http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
It supposed to
On 2013-09-18, john slee wrote:
> On 17 September 2013 20:37, Jes wrote:
>
>> but if you want you can mount them in /etc/fstab. Simply read the
>> documentation about permissions and syntax. It's very easy.
>>
> For NFS the best way is mount them in /etc/fstab too.
>>
>
> /Why/ is it the best w
* Riccardo Mottola [2013-09-18 08:58:22 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> I have updated to a current snapshot (13 sept to be precise). The
> system starts up, but most of the application which I had installed
> from ports crash with a "bad system call". wmaker, svn
> I thought we had binary compatibility a
Hi,
Philip Guenther wrote:
That binary compatibility was quite incomplete and only considered
good enough for building the system and *NOT* for general or long-term
use. Since we now have post-time_t-change snapshots for all archs, I
removed the compat code. You should have followed the direct
Hi,
For a very long time now, and many releases I'm having this strange
issue with my pfsync device which runs on an em(4) Intel 82575EB
on one of the two firewalls. When I reboot it (usually to put a newer
snapshot) the pfsync device does not work.
The rest of the em devices (in/out) are work
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:20, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Philip Guenther wrote:
>> That binary compatibility was quite incomplete and only considered
>> good enough for building the system and *NOT* for general or long-term
>> use. Since we now have post-time_t-change snapshots for all arc
http://open-zfs.org/wiki/About_OpenZFS
Under 'Other' at the bottom:
"ZFS source code is copyright various contributors, and available under the
CDDL open-source license."
The second paragraph is amusing:
"OpenZFS is not associated with openzfs.org. Don't forget the dash in our
URS: open-zfs.org
Hi,
When using synproxy state, PF seems to set the TCP window size to zero in ACK
packets. This breaks some network configurations, is this normal/desired ?
With synproxy state, we have win 0 :
14:33:02.934065 0800 74: 37.161.129.131.45134 > 192.168.1.2.80: S
1330066024:1330066024(0) win 14600
Hi,
Ted Unangst wrote:
I suppose something did not upgrade properly? I will try to uprgade to
today's snapshot.
Yes, SQLite was just upgraded in base.
Exactly, I had a skew between updating bae and ports, I redid it all
today and I'm up and running again :)
Thanks to all.
R
Hi,
checking ACPI on my older thinkpad T600x I notice (running current
snapshot of today) I don't seem th have ACPI. I know that some older
Thinkpads did have APCI "disabled by bios to avoid interfering with
windows" (back then of course support was bad), so I read.
I read in dmesg (full dme
apm has priority over acpi.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 18:32, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> checking ACPI on my older thinkpad T600x I notice (running current
> snapshot of today) I don't seem th have ACPI. I know that some older
> Thinkpads did have APCI "disabled by bios to avoid interfering
Considering that OpenBSD is implementing fuse, cannot then ZFS be included
just like package/port (using fuse infrastructure as in linux) to
circumvent licence issues?
Il giorno 18/set/2013 16:09, "Kenneth Westerback"
ha scritto:
> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/About_OpenZFS
>
> Under 'Other' at the b
Of course it can. It depends on time, resources, which basically means
programmers who are interested in this.
It will happen when it happens. Asking won't help. Giving money would
help... :)
If enough people are interested, you can work with the openbsd foundation
to fund a programmer to work
Just out of curiosity, did we miss the 5.4 pre-order announcement
this time around or was I the only one who missed it?
Regardless, my order was placed about a week ago. Thanks for all
your efforts!
Cheers,
--patrick
On Thu, September 19, 2013 00:35, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, did we miss the 5.4 pre-order announcement
> this time around or was I the only one who missed it?
It was silent. See undeadly.
>
> Regardless, my order was placed about a week ago. Thanks for all
> your efforts!
* hru...@gmail.com [2013-09-16 21:33]:
> It confirms that it supposes: A=B if hash(A)=hash(B).
which is fine even with a relatively poor hash like md5 when the size
is also checked.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
Secur
Riccardo Mottola libero.it> writes:
> apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
> acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
boot -c and disable apm
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * hru...@gmail.com [2013-09-16 21:33]:
> > It confirms that it supposes: A=B if hash(A)=hash(B).
>
> which is fine even with a relatively poor hash like md5 when the size
> is also checked.
A=B because parts of the file in the server coincide with parts of the
file in th
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 09:25:55PM +, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > * hru...@gmail.com [2013-09-16 21:33]:
> > > It confirms that it supposes: A=B if hash(A)=hash(B).
> >
> > which is fine even with a relatively poor hash like md5 when the size
> > is also checked.
>
What was the probability?
Rodrigo.
Eric Furman wrote:
> Troll, the question has been answered.
> You are an entertaining troll, though.
> It is highly amusing seeing someone make themselves look so silly.
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013, at 11:28 AM, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Marc Espie wrote:
> >
Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
Fuck off
/Alexander
On 09/18/13 23:59, hru...@gmail.com wrote:
What was the probability?
Rodrigo.
Eric Furman wrote:
Troll, the question has been answered.
You are an entertaining troll, though.
It is highly amusing seeing someo
So if one has a 5.3 release system running, but finds a desired package in
say 5.1, will pkg_add work on this, assuming I adjust the PKG_PATH to point
to a 5.1 package folder? Or will doing this cause other instabilities?
Thanks,
Richard
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 06:16:20PM -0400, Richard Thornton wrote:
> So if one has a 5.3 release system running, but finds a desired package in
> say 5.1, will pkg_add work on this, assuming I adjust the PKG_PATH to point
> to a 5.1 package folder? Or will doing this cause other instabilities?
The
Ok, thanks for the help.
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE
network.
From: Marc EspieSent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 6:24 PMTo: Richard
ThorntonReply To: espie@nerim.netCc: OpenBSD general usage listSubject:
Re: general ports question
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> Suppose you are limited to length 1 strings of [a-z], then you have
> 29 possible strings.
>
> Still. If you select one of those strings and calculates its SHA-1
> hash value. When you try any of the other 28 strings (or any other
> string of any lengh
Jiri B [ji...@devio.us] wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:37:49AM -0500, patric conant wrote:
> > http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/Announcement
> >
> > It supposed to be open-er. I didn't find a license, thought it might be of
> > mild interest.
>
> bitrig (OpenBSD fork) has ongoing work to intergr
Alexander Hall wrote:
> Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
>
> > Fuck off
The most brilliant answers of the experts:
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:18:03 +0200
From: Marc Espie
To: hru...@gmail.com
Cc: t...@servasoftware.com, misc@openbsd.org
Subject
Paolo Aglialoro [paol...@gmail.com] wrote:
> Considering that OpenBSD is implementing fuse, cannot then ZFS be included
> just like package/port (using fuse infrastructure as in linux) to
> circumvent licence issues?
Yeah, if you want your filesystem to be some huge monster slow bloated
piece of s
hru...@gmail.com writes:
> Alexander Hall wrote:
>
>> Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
>>
>> > Fuck off
>
> The most brilliant answers of the experts:
[...]
Those people, that you qualify as experts, have spent hours reading and
answering your mails. I bet you're prett
I've just came on this:
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/pipermail/linux-il/2013-September/010649.html
Just a short quote of it:
"Hi, today we've made the first release of OSv, a new operating system
for running applications on virtual machines. OSv is free software,
released under the BSD license.
Interesting. I just used Xfce for a bit on a new Ubuntu box from a vendor
here today, I didn't check the version. It sure has come a lng way
from when I last used it around 1999. I may try it out on my home desktop,
seems a lot more responsive than KDE and Gnome.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:
Joe Gidi [j...@entropicblur.com] wrote:
> Support for the RdRand instruction was added to i386 and amd64 a year ago
> (see http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=134808609318790&w=2 ), but recent
> events have called its trustworthiness into question:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RdRand
> https://p
2013/9/19
> Alexander Hall wrote:
> > Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
> >
> > > Fuck off
>
> The most brilliant answers of the experts:
>
An old quote which fits nicely here:
A book is a mirror: if an ape looks into it an apostle is hardly likely to
look out. We have
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:01:13 +0200, Janne Johansson wrote:
>2013/9/19
>
>> Alexander Hall wrote:
>> > Marc already anwered all your questions. Let me quote it.
>> >
>> > > Fuck off
>>
>> The most brilliant answers of the experts:
>>
>
>An old quote which fits nicely here:
>
>A book is a mirror:
38 matches
Mail list logo
