Paolo Aglialoro [paol...@gmail.com] wrote: > Considering that OpenBSD is implementing fuse, cannot then ZFS be included > just like package/port (using fuse infrastructure as in linux) to > circumvent licence issues?
Yeah, if you want your filesystem to be some huge monster slow bloated piece of shit? ZFS needs to be in the kernel, and other than the April 1st joke, you won't see a ZFS commit message to the OpenBSD kernel. Tracking the WAPBL and Hammer integration in bitrig to OpenBSD is a remote possibility, much more than ZFS ever would be.
