hOn Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 09:35:56AM +0300, Dimitrios Moustos wrote:
> Hello,
> I have not found any information in the man page or otherwise that conflicts
> with the bellow, it just does not seem like the following should be possible:
>
> # grep home /etc/fstab
> 424dc014a22db950.f /home ffs ro
On 2012-06-11, Dimitrios Moustos wrote:
> Hello,
> I have not found any information in the man page or otherwise that conflicts
> with the bellow, it just does not seem like the following should be possible:
>
> # grep home /etc/fstab
> 424dc014a22db950.f /home ffs ro,nodev,nosuid,noatime
> # mou
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:35:50AM +0800, z_axis wrote:
> I know wine port has been stopped. I wonder whether or not it is
> applicable to port wine to OpenBSD ?
> Wine works great on FreeBSD, why cannot it run on OpenBSD ?
Somebody has to resolve the issues in the code :)
Take it from ports in
Centro de Seguridad - BBVA net  Nos pusimos en contacto por correo
electrónico con usted hace poco para pedirle ayuda en la resolución de
un problema en su cuenta de BBVA. Su cuenta aún está limitada
temporalmente porque no hemos tenido noticias suyas. Queremos colaborar
con usted para normal
>On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:35:50AM +0800, z_axis wrote:
>> I know wine port has been stopped. I wonder whether or not it is
>> applicable to port wine to OpenBSD ?
>> Wine works great on FreeBSD, why cannot it run on OpenBSD ?
>
>Somebody has to resolve the issues in the code :)
>
>Take it from p
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 03:49:21PM +0200, Peter Laufenberg wrote:
> I personally don't care for WINE but would really like to know more more
> about virtualization options on OpenBSD hosts; VirtualBox is the only reason
> I need to keep some Debian hosts around (that and my secret crush on Larry
Jan Stary writes:
> On Jun 10 13:42:28, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> On 10/06/12(Sun) 12:51, Jan Stary wrote:
>> > I got this Mac Mini on my hands, and I would like to install
>> > current/macppc on it. According to
...
> I only have the minimac, not the other apple paraphernalia;
> in particular, I
On 2012-06-10 11:26, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
+ if (setsockopt(udp[i], IPPROTO_IPV6,
+ IPV6_HOPLIMIT,&on, sizeof(on))< 0) {
s/IPV6_HOPLIMIT/IPV6_RECVHOPLIMIT/
RFC 3542 for more info.
Simon
Recently I made the switch from ntp to openntpd. Seemingly random
memory write errors by the ntp daemon finally convinced me that ntp had
become too bloated for the reliability I desired.
So far, my experience with openntpd has been very good. But I missed
some of the status reporting ability of
Writing Prize 1,000,000 yen, ongoing now!
If you contribute articles, brilliant enouf, to the Guest Book below,
then,
you'll have chances to get about 100,000 to 800,000 yen as a total, as a
prize.
Guest Book
http://jbbs.livedoor.com/bbs/read.cgi/study/3729/1088236761
Why is this w
￥￥￥『万有サロン』書き込み大賞・総額100万円
この掲示板に優秀な書き込みをして、総額100万円の賞金をゲットしよう！
(*^^)v
万有サロン
http://jbbs.livedoor.jp/study/3729/
書き込み大賞の詳細
http://jbbs.livedoor.jp/bbs/read.cgi/study/3729/1069922074/78-
書き込み大賞の詳細(資料倉庫内)
http://www2.tba.t-com.ne.jp/a-z/omake/banyu/taisho.htm
また、
>On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Peter Laufenberg
>wrote:
>> Qemu seems like a good project given the flack it gets on wikipedia (very
>> Cartesian, I know), how well can it run on OpenBSD? what's holding it back?
>> which kernel improvements/patches will help? if all VM is counter-security,
> > > > I got this Mac Mini on my hands, and I would like to install
> > > > current/macppc on it. According to
> > > > http://www.openbsd.org/macppc.html#hardware
> > > > the following MicMini's are supported:
> > > >
> > > > Mac mini (PowerMac10,1)
> > > > Mac mini (Late 2005 (Po
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:16:28PM -0400, Simon Perreault wrote:
> On 2012-06-10 11:26, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> >+if (setsockopt(udp[i], IPPROTO_IPV6,
> >+IPV6_HOPLIMIT,&on, sizeof(on))< 0) {
>
> s/IPV6_HOPLIMIT/IPV6_RECVHO
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Peter Laufenberg
wrote:
>>On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Peter Laufenberg
wrote:
>>> Qemu seems like a good project given the flack it gets on wikipedia (very
Cartesian, I know), how well can it run on OpenBSD? what's holding it back?
which kernel improvements/p
> I understand that "hd" and "cd" are just devaliases; in my case,
>
> hd /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@0
> cd /pci@f400/ata-6@d/disk@1
>
> Does that mean that those device aliases are somehow mixed up?
Well, given the dmesg says...
> cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: ATAPI
314034
[IMAGE]
Taller de Manejo Óptimo de la Ventanilla Única de Comercio Exterior
18 de Junio, Cd. de México.
Un taller totalmente práctico guiado por un experto.
Optimice sus procesos y ahorre dinero con esta práctica herramienta!
¡Reciba la información completa, Inscríbase y Capacítese!
Por fav
Running 5.1-RELEASE.
According to ospf6d.conf(5):
*router-dead-time* /seconds/
Set the router dead time, a.k.a. neighbor inactivity timer. The
default value is 40 seconds; valid range is 2-2147483647 seconds.
When a neighbor has been inactive for
Hi Andrew
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 02:10:51PM -0700, Andrew Klettke wrote:
> Running 5.1-RELEASE.
>
> According to ospf6d.conf(5):
>
> *router-dead-time* /seconds/
> Set the router dead time, a.k.a. neighbor inactivity timer. The
> default value is 40 seconds;
Dear Mailing Listeners,
Let me know, please, whether it makes sense to modify disk geometry
for solid state disks? Which meaning have the default values of cylinders,
heads, and sectors for these devices? As an example, here are my sd1 data:
# fdisk sd1
Disk: sd1 geometry: 7783/255/63 [125
On 10 June 2012 16:53, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Jun 10 13:42:28, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> On 10/06/12(Sun) 12:51, Jan Stary wrote:
>> > I got this Mac Mini on my hands, and I would like to install
>> > current/macppc on it. According to
>> > http://www.openbsd.org/macppc.html#hardware
>> > the follo
On 06/11/12 19:25, Jens A. Griepentrog wrote:
> Dear Mailing Listeners,
>
> Let me know, please, whether it makes sense to modify disk geometry
> for solid state disks?
no
> Which meaning have the default values of cylinders,
> heads, and sectors for these devices?
roughly the exact same thing
Please Note, To Protect Your ANZ Online Account and Internet Banking.
Please "LOGIN" Now.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 06/11/12 19:25, Jens A. Griepentrog wrote:
> > Dear Mailing Listeners,
> >
> > Let me know, please, whether it makes sense to modify disk geometry
> > for solid state disks?
>
> no
>
> > Which meaning have the default values of cylinders,
>
>On 06/11/12 19:25, Jens A. Griepentrog wrote:
>> Let me know, please, whether it makes sense to modify disk geometry
>> for solid state disks?
>
>If you knew what physical block size your SSD worked with, you might --
>MIGHT -- see some benefit using that, but the 4k offsets seem to work
>just fin
25 matches
Mail list logo
