On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Peter Laufenberg <open...@laufenberg.ch> wrote: >>On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Peter Laufenberg <open...@laufenberg.ch> wrote: >>> Qemu seems like a good project given the flack it gets on wikipedia (very Cartesian, I know), how well can it run on OpenBSD? what's holding it back? which kernel improvements/patches will help? if all VM is counter-security, why? Where do we come from and is there life after death? I demand to know. >> >>Qemu is fine on OpenBSD, but slow, because for some time already it's >>without KVM in OpenBSD. Probably one of the reasons for www.bitrig.org > > I see. Lofty goals with a questionable fork rationale. Maybe removing doc references to floppies and tapes would improve the "modernity" perception.
they also removed code makefiles really arent set up for mass edits. it's hard to do static checks > > >From Jiri: >>Why don't you first search archives? > > - digressions into exotic sports cars? > - marketing plugs? > - out of date? > > -- p
