>On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Peter Laufenberg <open...@laufenberg.ch> >wrote: >> Qemu seems like a good project given the flack it gets on wikipedia (very >> Cartesian, I know), how well can it run on OpenBSD? what's holding it back? >> which kernel improvements/patches will help? if all VM is counter-security, >> why? Where do we come from and is there life after death? I demand to know. > >Qemu is fine on OpenBSD, but slow, because for some time already it's >without KVM in OpenBSD. Probably one of the reasons for www.bitrig.org
I see. Lofty goals with a questionable fork rationale. Maybe removing doc references to floppies and tapes would improve the "modernity" perception. >From Jiri: >Why don't you first search archives? - digressions into exotic sports cars? - marketing plugs? - out of date? -- p
