Re: 4.1 to 4.2 disklabel woes

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:29:32PM -0700, Darrian Hale wrote: > Thanks for your help, > > See additional comments below. > > -Darrian > > > > Just edit your disklabel, using the 'm' command. > > Thanks, this worked. After booting from 4.2 ramdisk kernel, i ran > disklabel -E wd0 > I then modi

Re: 4.1 to 4.2 disklabel woes

Thanks for your help, See additional comments below. -Darrian On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:47:48AM -0700, Darrian Hale wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > First of all I want to thank anyone in advance for any help i receive.

Re: 4.1 to 4.2 disklabel woes

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:47:48AM -0700, Darrian Hale wrote: > Hello, > > First of all I want to thank anyone in advance for any help i receive. I am > having problems upgrading from OpenBSD 4.1 to 4.2. > > After putting the GENERIC 4.2 kernel in place, i get the following errors > for all par

Re: 4.1 Hacked? Some interesting hashes

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:34:18AM -0800, Manuel Ravasio wrote: Hey there, > Ok, I did understand THAT. > What I'm still missing is the relationship (if any) between a couple of > hashes and a possible breach in OBSD... Well, if the guy genuinely had an exploit and wanted to keep the mechanism

Re: 4.1 Hacked? Some interesting hashes

Didi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do you guys think of this? There's not enough data to say much one way or the other, really. Those hashes do not provide sufficient data to recreate the files they were made from, they're only checksums of a kind that's hard to fake. Then again, a general

Re: 4.1 Hacked? Some interesting hashes

On Feb 11, 2008 1:34 PM, Manuel Ravasio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I'm still missing is the relationship (if any) between a couple of > hashes and a possible breach in OBSD... Supposedly these are the hashes of tarball containing exploit code/binary for a security hole in OpenSSH shipped

Re: 4.1 Hacked? Some interesting hashes

make messes in the house. -Robert Heinlein - Original Message > From: Dogbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Manuel Ravasio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: misc@OpenBSD.org > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:37:45 PM > Subject: Re: 4.1 Hacked? S

Re: 4.1 Hacked? Some interesting hashes

http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Trolling On 2/11/08, Manuel Ravasio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please, forgive my ignorance, but I can't understand the meaning of your post. > Can you please explain, or point me to some useful link in order to > understand the issue? > > Thanks, > Manuel >

Re: 4.1 Hacked? Some interesting hashes

Please, forgive my ignorance, but I can't understand the meaning of your post. Can you please explain, or point me to some useful link in order to understand the issue? Thanks, Manuel -- Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human. At best he is a tolerable sub-human who has lear

Re: 4.1 Hacked? Some interesting hashes

On Feb 11, 2008 9:06 AM, Didi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SHA1(screwtheo.tar)=ad1bc1f05afa2cc3ccadb18fabb985394c02ce8d > MD5(screwtheo.tar)= cee67df76eaa0706e666cd5c0b8b711c > > OpenSSH exploit for linux > SHA1(screwtheo_linux.tar)=cb6816de43df87193050a497a83cd8f7ab721fbd > MD5(screwtheo_linux.tar

Re: 4.1 Hacked? Some interesting hashes

Didi a icrit : > Hey > > What do you guys think of this? > > >From http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/487824 : > <8--- > OpenBSD 4.1 sshd remote root exploit (on the default install!): > > SHA1(screwtheo.tar)=ad1bc1f05afa2cc3ccadb18fabb985394c02ce8d > MD5(screwtheo.tar)= cee67df76ea

Re: 4.1 fresh install dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state

> I have cut and pasted the output from ifconfig and dmesg below. > I do have a non tulip nic I might try tomorrow. Try a -current kernel. If it occurs, obtain a backtrace / kernel core dump and post it. Possibly file a PR if it is warranted. It might not get fixed quickly, so grab an xl(4)/fxp

Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:48:11 -0500, Aaron wrote: >... SNIP > >Is anyone using solid state drives yet? > CF is effectively IDE. Witness (a firewall here): # disklabel wd0 # Inside MBR partition 3: type A6 start 63 size 1000881 # /dev/rwd0c: type: ESDI disk: ESDI/IDE disk label: SanD

Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?

Jan Stary wrote: Hi all, last night, I installed 4.1 on the new ALIX.1C: http://www.pcengines.ch/alix1c.htm (see dmesg at bottom). The intended use of the box is a home router/firewall/NAT/DNS/DHCP for my home "network" of about four computers (heterogeneous). Everything works fine (as usual wi

Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?

On Sep 21 09:49:20, Nick Holland wrote: > >http://www.pcengines.ch/alix1c.htm (see dmesg at bottom). > >The intended use of the box is a home router/firewall/NAT/DNS/DHCP > >for my home "network" of about four computers (heterogeneous). > >Firstly, swap (i don't really mind reinstalling). Install

Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?

Jan Stary wrote: I am concerned about the CF wearing off. As these articles are from 2005 - do these things still apply to newer CF cards, and should I therefore set up a mfs? What else should I do to make the CF card live longer (noatime comes to mind of course). Remote sysloging

Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?

Jan Stary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > last night, I installed 4.1 on the new ALIX.1C: > http://www.pcengines.ch/alix1c.htm (see dmesg at bottom). > The intended use of the box is a home router/firewall/NAT/DNS/DHCP > for my home "network" of about four computers (heterogeneous). I recently got a

Re: 4.1 on ALIX.1C - recommendations?

Jan Stary wrote: Hi all, last night, I installed 4.1 on the new ALIX.1C: http://www.pcengines.ch/alix1c.htm (see dmesg at bottom). The intended use of the box is a home router/firewall/NAT/DNS/DHCP for my home "network" of about four computers (heterogeneous). Everything works fine (as usual wi

Re: 4.1-stable 'make build' dies with 'out of memory' building perl

In I wrote: > I run -stable on an IBM/Lenovo T41p laptop with 512M memory and 2G swap. > I cvs-updated /usr/src on Aug 22 around 21:00 GMT. As usual, I followed > the instructions at http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html to rebuild... > but u

Re: 4.1-release packages with 4.1-stable system ?

Hi Ronnie, > Now i wonder if i still can use 4.1-release packages, from any mirror. Set up $PKG_PATH to point at your favo(u)rite mirror. Depending on your architecture, you get updated packages with `pkg_add -ui`. The answer, in short, is 'yes, but check for updates'. HTH... Nico

Re: 4.1 !

Hi, Karel Kulhavy has spoken, thus: > I wonder whether getting the graphics somehow and asking a local shop to burn > it on a hoodie for personal use would be fair use. I'm almost sure it would. if you would make a substitutional donation for not buying the hoodie, I would say so, too ;) Have a

Re: 4.1 !

On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:10:26AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: > It's in ! It looks very very very cool ;) > > Thanks Wim for such an incredibly speedy delivery ! In my last case Wim delivered very slowly. I wanted to buy an obsd hoodie as a christmas 2006 present. Wim assured me it shouldn't be

Re: 4.1 upgrade problem

For the archives: After a lot of head scratching, I discovered that symlinking /var/www to somewhere else using an absolute path causes problems such as what I was seeing during install. It is normal since the root location changes. Use relative symlinks.

Re: 4.1 install issue

After the install, everything working now. Summary disks: wd0 300GB sata wd1 40GB pata wd2 30GB pata wd2 is boot disk as wd0 is reserved for virtual tape drives and will be erased frequently. The bios on this Dell Dimension 2400 is stupid, so I just avoided it by installing GAG boot manager http:/

Re: 4.1 install issue

Don't forget to mess with your bios settings. If you set up your bios correctly, you don't have to fsck with anything. Remember, boys and girls, this is why the PC is such an advanced piece of 21st century technology. -- "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." --

Re: 4.1 install issue

Call me stupid and beat me with that cluebat until it's in little pieces! I finally realized that I caused all my problems by assuming the drive order during install. I am now installing again and before initializing the drives, dropped to the shell and confirmed the drive order. The SATA drive i

Re: 4.1 install issue

Well, the loader actually looks at hd0 and the system was able to boot with a modified fstab, but then disklabel shows info for incorrect drives and I am not able to mount the new drive. I will try boot -c and your suggestions and let you know what happens On 6/18/07, Marco S Hyman <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: 4.1 install issue

"Bruce Bauer" writes: > You nailed it down! > After boot>-s, examining the dmesg shows the SATA drive is wd0 and the > former wd0 is wd1 and the former wd1 is wd2. Now if my thinking is > correct, all I should have to do is edit fstab to reflect the changed > drive positions and the system sh

Re: 4.1 install issue

Here is new dmesg from working system: Thanks for your help! Bruce OpenBSD 4.1 (GENERIC) #1435: Sat Mar 10 19:07:45 MST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.80 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,

Re: 4.1 install issue

You nailed it down! After boot>-s, examining the dmesg shows the SATA drive is wd0 and the former wd0 is wd1 and the former wd1 is wd2. Now if my thinking is correct, all I should have to do is edit fstab to reflect the changed drive positions and the system should be happy. On 6/18/07, Stuart H

Re: 4.1 install issue

On 2007/06/18 11:53, Bruce Bauer wrote: > Anybody with a relavent cluebat is welcome to give me a whack. boot -s, look at disklabels and/or manually mount partitions and work out what's showing up where. Perhaps the SATA drive appears as wd0 and shunts the other drives along.

Re: 4.1 install issue

On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Bruce Bauer wrote: > Nice conversation with myself here. > did some googling > tried: > boot>-c > disable pciide > pciide disabled > quit > system booted with the SATA hard drive attached but not recognized > This snippet from dmesg shows why: > "CMD Technology SiI3512 SATA" r

Re: 4.1 install issue

Nice conversation with myself here. did some googling tried: boot>-c disable pciide pciide disabled quit system booted with the SATA hard drive attached but not recognized This snippet from dmesg shows why: "CMD Technology SiI3512 SATA" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 6 function 0 not configured pciide(4) s

Re: 4.1 install issue

3rd install finished, booted up with no problem. Added SATA card back in, booted up with no problem. Connected SATA hard drive, get many problems with various mounts being busy Here is some hand copied console output with a SATA drive connected during boot: /dev/rwd0d: MARKING FILE SYSTEM CLEAN /

Re: 4.1 panic 4.0 ok -solved

Hi All, Regarding the issue I mentioned below, it is because I am using the Intel Motherboard. I have read some email before regarding the same problem, in those email, need to change the vparam.h (something) and to build the stable. I was able to run the OpenBSD 4.1 with the hardware now. Sorr

Re: 4.1 with network card issue -solved

Hi All, Regarding the issue I mentioned below, it is because I am using the Intel Motherboard. I have read some email before regarding the same problem, in those email, need to change the vparam.h (something) and to build the stable. I was able to run the OpenBSD 4.1 with the hardware now. Sorr

Re: 4.1 upgrade and squid

Bryan Irvine wrote: I've upgraded my firewall to 4.1 and all of the packages. Now squid fails to start with the new version. I get the following errors: 2007/05/21 16:22:32| aclParseAclLine: WARNING: empty ACL: acl BlockSites url_regex "/etc/squid/blocksites.txt" 2007/05/21 16:22:32| parseC

Re: 4.1 upgrade and squid

Bryan Irvine wrote: > I've upgraded my firewall to 4.1 and all of the packages. Now squid .. > > Any ideas what I need to change on the new version of squid? I ended up using /usr/local/share/examples/squid/squid.conf with a few minor modifications.

Re: 4.1 PXEboot fails to load via etherboot

Solved it. Etherboot cannot process files an integer multiple of 1432 bytes. pxeboot V4.1 is 36 * 1432 = 51552 bytes long. Added two bytes to V4.1 pxeboot and it (Etherboot) works fine. --John _ Windows Live Hotmail, with safe

Re: 4.1 changelog discrepency? - *Make sure pf(4) doesn't set 'flags S/SA' on stateless rules.

On 5/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a stateless rule on one of my boxes which was just upgraded from 4.0to 4.1. After the upgrade there were some odd issues that were reported and after looking into them I tracked the source of the issues down to a rule that was set no

Re: 4.1 changelog discrepency? - *Make sure pf(4) doesn't set 'flags S/SA' on stateless rules.

On Mon, 14 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have a stateless rule on one of my boxes which was just upgraded from 4.0to > 4.1. After the upgrade there were some odd issues that were reported and > after looking into them I tracked the source of the issues down to a rule > that was set not to

Re: 4.1 Packages Page

Djgoku he say: >> http://www.openbsd.org/4.1_packages/ Gets a 404 error. http://www.openbsd.org/4.0_packages/ Works fine. << This appears to be normal procedure when a new release comes out. Give it a few days, and it'll be fine. (He says, confidently.) Steve http://www.fivetrees.com

Re: 4.1 Packages Page

Hi there, > On 5/3/07, djgoku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.openbsd.org/4.1_packages/ > > Gets a 404 error. I Agree - Noticed this the oyther day. -- Best Regards Edd

Re: 4.1 Packages Page

No problems with cvsweb here. but packages page isn't available On 5/4/07, djgoku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/3/07, djgoku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.openbsd.org/4.1_packages/ > > Gets a 404 error. > > http://www.openbsd.org/4.0_packages/ > > Works fine. > > > > Link found o

Re: 4.1 Packages Page

On 5/3/07, djgoku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://www.openbsd.org/4.1_packages/ Gets a 404 error. http://www.openbsd.org/4.0_packages/ Works fine. Link found on: http://openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ Am also having issues with cvsweb. Anyone else?

Re: 4.1-stable build fails for sparc64

On Monday, April 30, 2007 at 11:45:05 +0200, Maurice Janssen wrote: >Hi, > >I'm trying to build a release(8) of 4.1-stable for a couple of >architectures. I installed 4.1-release from the CD on i386, sparc and >sparc64. I untarred the srs.tar.gz from the CD on an NFS server (also >running 4.1-rel

Re: 4.1-stable compile fails

Using the the mirror anoncvs.usa.openbsd.org fixed the problem. Thanks.

Re: 4.1-stable compile fails

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:41:32AM -0500, Sean Malloy wrote: > I have been getting exactly the same error trying to track 4.1 STABLE > and 4.0 STABLE on my amd64 machine. I have tried several different > mirrors with no luck. I don't know how to fix the problem, but you are > not alone. > -- > Sea

Re: 4.1-stable compile fails

> I have been getting exactly the same error trying to track > 4.1 STABLE and 4.0 STABLE on my amd64 machine. I have tried > several different mirrors with no luck. I don't know how to > fix the problem, but you are not alone. I have been pointed to a thread on -tech: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-t

Re: 4.1-stable compile fails

On 5/3/07, Jason Haag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Did a "cvs up -rOPENBSD_4_1" against rt.fm, started a build and got the error below. Anyone else seeing this or did I mess up my source tree? editor.c does not exist in the reference directory, but the Makefile refers to it. Re-running a "cvs up

Re: 4.1-stable compile fails

Some people mailed about it as "4.1 disklable compile issues" -- Daniel > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Jason Haag > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 5:16 PM > To: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: 4.1-stable compile fails > > Did a "cvs u

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Wed, 02 May 2007 02:54:51 -0500, Joerg Zinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: does this work with a standard kernel build from GENERIC or GENERIC.MP, too? Or did i need to get a snapshot respectively built an own kernel and uncomment the acpi lines in GENERIC(.MP)? I believe this works with

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Wed, 2 May 2007 10:21:10 +0200 Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:54:51AM +0200, Joerg Zinke wrote: > | > $ config -ef bsd.rd > | > OpenBSD 4.1-current (RAMDISK_CD) #298: Sun Apr 29 14:18:55 MDT > 2007 | > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAM

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:54:51AM +0200, Joerg Zinke wrote: | > $ config -ef bsd.rd | > OpenBSD 4.1-current (RAMDISK_CD) #298: Sun Apr 29 14:18:55 MDT 2007 | > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD | > Enter 'help' for information | > ukc> find acpi | > 216 acpi0 at mainb

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 1 May 2007 20:59:31 +0200 Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:27:38PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: > | On Tue, 01 May 2007 13:15:04 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: | > | >On Tue, 1 May 2007, Aaron Hsu wrote: > | > > | >>On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 01 May 2007 18:54:02 -0500, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:17:20AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: Good luck ! You *are* going to need it... Actually, I had great luck. This was ridiculously easy. I am in the process of documenting my efforts

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:17:20AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 05:38:17PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: > | On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:20:35 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > | >Huh? How is the OP supposed to get an install if the cd41.iso isn't > | >working? > |

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 05:38:17PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: | On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:20:35 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | >Huh? How is the OP supposed to get an install if the cd41.iso isn't | >working? | | If someone will point me to some instructions on how to build a custom |

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:20:35 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Huh? How is the OP supposed to get an install if the cd41.iso isn't working? If someone will point me to some instructions on how to build a custom boot CD I can use an emulator on OS X to build an ISO, burn it usi

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 1 May 2007, Joachim Schipper wrote: > Not that I know anything about macs, but wouldn't starting boot from an > official cdXY.iso and then using that to load the kernel off a different > CD work just fine? Unless I am mistaken, boot doesn't require the CD to > be present after it's started

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:20:35PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > Huh? How is the OP supposed to get an install if the cd41.iso isn't working? To get around this problem, I installed using 4.0 and threw bsd.rd from 4.1 onto a CDR. After installing 4.0, I copied the bsd.rd from the CDR to /bsd. Th

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 1 May 2007, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:20:35PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > | > | >One quite involved method I can think of: if you have parallels, you > | > | >could use that to build a ACPI enabled release (see release(8), remove > | > | >"disable" from the acpi l

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:20:35PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Paul de Weerd wrote: > > > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:27:38PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: > > | On Tue, 01 May 2007 13:15:04 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > | > > | >On Tue, 1 May 2007, Aaron

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:20:35PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: | > | >One quite involved method I can think of: if you have parallels, you | > | >could use that to build a ACPI enabled release (see release(8), remove | > | >"disable" from the acpi line for GENERIC and RAMDISK_CD). *SNIP* | Huh? H

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 1 May 2007, Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:27:38PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: > | On Tue, 01 May 2007 13:15:04 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > | >On Tue, 1 May 2007, Aaron Hsu wrote: > | > > | >>On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:35:33 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:27:38PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: | On Tue, 01 May 2007 13:15:04 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | >On Tue, 1 May 2007, Aaron Hsu wrote: | > | >>On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:35:33 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | >>wrote: | | [...] | | >>> The UKC prom

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:56:30PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: | On Tue, 01 May 2007 13:51:26 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | >It's probably better to just follow the steps in release(8) instead | >of trying to cut corners. With the modified GENERIC and RAMDISK_CD | >conf files, of

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 01 May 2007 13:51:26 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's probably better to just follow the steps in release(8) instead of trying to cut corners. With the modified GENERIC and RAMDISK_CD conf files, of course. Is it possible to edit some boot file, say /etc/boot.conf i

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 1 May 2007, Aaron Hsu wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2007 13:15:04 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Aaron Hsu wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:35:33 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > [...] > > > > > The UKC prompt is sti

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 01 May 2007 13:15:04 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 1 May 2007, Aaron Hsu wrote: On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:35:33 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The UKC prompt is still not working, you'll need an ACPI enabled > bsd.rd. I do not hav

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 1 May 2007, Aaron Hsu wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:35:33 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Paul de Weerd wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:35:52PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: > > > | The threads regarding the Macbook Pro and ACPI support a

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:35:33 -0500, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 1 May 2007, Paul de Weerd wrote: On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:35:52PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: | The threads regarding the Macbook Pro and ACPI support all seem to | indicate that they can successfully boot to th

Re: 4.1 i386, server freezing... ( was: Yet, another thread about running out of static map entries.)

Hi, On Thu, 26.04.2007 at 12:53:26 -0400, STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Try decreasing the amount of ram. what changes in OpenBSD are required to use really much RAM (>> 4GB), then? Please... Best, --Toni++

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Tue, 1 May 2007, Paul de Weerd wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:35:52PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: > | The threads regarding the Macbook Pro and ACPI support all seem to > | indicate that they can successfully boot to the install prompt once they > | enable ACPI through the UKC c

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

Hi Aaron, On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:35:52PM -0500, Aaron Hsu wrote: | The threads regarding the Macbook Pro and ACPI support all seem to | indicate that they can successfully boot to the install prompt once they | enable ACPI through the UKC config prompt, which may or may not be usable | until a

Re: 4.1, patch 003, need help with the application instructions.

On 4/30/07, Allie Daneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can someone help out with how to properly build and install spamd as per patch 003 ? Usually the application instructions are a bit more informative,Thanks ;) Apply by doing: cd /usr/src patch -p0 < 003_spamd.patch Then buil

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:17:34 -0500, Ben Calvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Aaron Hsu wrote: I am wondering what problems I am going to run into with the 4.1- RELEASE and a Macbook Pro. Right now I have tried to boot up the latest snapshot on my Core Duo Macb

Re: 4.1 and Macbook Pro

search the archives under 'macbook pro' and 'acpi' On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Aaron Hsu wrote: Hello all, I am wondering what problems I am going to run into with the 4.1- RELEASE and a Macbook Pro. Right now I have tried to boot up the latest snapshot on my Core Duo Macbook Pro and it

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

On 4/27/07, Jonathan Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well ignoring all the when before I would just like to say thanks for another OpenBSD release which I have just received, early as always. I for one will always buy the CD/T-shirt/anything else useful'ish I can afford. It'll go on my test ser

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

Well ignoring all the when before I would just like to say thanks for another OpenBSD release which I have just received, early as always. I for one will always buy the CD/T-shirt/anything else useful'ish I can afford. It'll go on my test server this weekend. thanks again, Jon On Mon, 2007-04-

Re: 4.1 i386, server freezing... ( was: Yet, another thread about running out of static map entries.)

On Thursday 26 April 2007 11:31:54 Private Joker wrote: > OK, after setting MAX_KMAPENT to 4000, the server only > lasts about 25 hours before a weird freeze -- which is > less than before. This weird freeze still answer to > ping, and consoles changes, but I can't log in, and > everything else sto

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

frantisek holop wrote: Ok. You need to stop pissing off the developers. They've already said, wait till May 1st. It's done. It's not open to discussion. Move on. Accept the fact that some people know more about running a project on a limited budget and limited resources. We DON'T want LESS time

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

Well, just to let you know OpenBSD has come a long way over the years. Take a look at what you got if you were using it in it's beginning, ftp://mirror.iawnet.sandia.gov/pub/OpenBSD/2.0/ diana

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

Paul de Weerd wrote: On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:36:36AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: | > Release day is May 1. | | ok, ok, keep the steam down. nothing really happened, | i was just looking at this from a diff angle. | | i simply did not make the connection that i am not | supposed to use m

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, frantisek holop wrote: > > and all you others: so is it not a punishment that you > have the cds and still can't use them? hypocrites, all of you! Last time I looked, there were packages on the cd too... -- [100~Plax]sb16i0A2172656B63616820636420726568746F6E

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

On 4/24/07, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ok, ok, keep the steam down. nothing really happened, i was just looking at this from a diff angle. i simply did not make the connection that i am not supposed to use my cds before may 1. put a big sticker "bits inside valid only from may

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

frantisek holop wrote: i simply did not make the connection that i am not supposed to use my cds before may 1. put a big sticker "bits inside valid only from may 1" on the case or something :P Why? It's pretty obvious that the official release date is May 1 and you cant expect to download anyth

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:36:36AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: | > Release day is May 1. | | ok, ok, keep the steam down. nothing really happened, | i was just looking at this from a diff angle. | | i simply did not make the connection that i am not | supposed to use my cds before may 1. | |

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:38:32PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > > hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:21PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > > > > today my openbsd package arived (thanks wim) and i know that > > > > it's not released yet, but i was wondering if it was possible > > > > to mak

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > frantisek holop > Sent: 24 April 2007 12:16 AM > To: OpenBSD > Subject: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites > > hi there, > > today my openbsd package arived (thanks wim) and i know that > it's not released ye

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

> On 4/23/07, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:21PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > > > > today my openbsd package arived (thanks wim) and i know that > > > > it's not released yet, but i was wondering if it was possible > > > > to make the packages

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

> hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:21PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > > > today my openbsd package arived (thanks wim) and i know that > > > it's not released yet, but i was wondering if it was possible > > > to make the packages available on the ftp servers. the base > > > system is not ther

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

On 4/23/07, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:21PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > > today my openbsd package arived (thanks wim) and i know that > > it's not released yet, but i was wondering if it was possible > > to make the packages available on th

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 06:58:15PM -0400, Nick Holland said that > frantisek holop wrote: > > hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:21PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > >> > today my openbsd package arived (thanks wim) and i know that > >> > it's not released yet, but i was wondering if it was p

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:37:52AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:21PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > > > today my openbsd package arived (thanks wim) and i know that > > > it's not released yet, but i was wondering if it was possible > > > to make the packages

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

On 4/23/07, frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:21PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > > today my openbsd package arived (thanks wim) and i know that > > it's not released yet, but i was wondering if it was possible > > to make the packages available on th

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:27:21PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that >> > today my openbsd package arived (thanks wim) and i know that >> > it's not released yet, but i was wondering if it was possible >> > to make the packages available on the ftp servers. the base >> >

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

hmm, on Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:47:02PM -0500, Matthew R. Dempsky said that > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:37:52AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > > i can't think of any serious reason, could you help out a bit? > > 4.1 isn't released yet. i am not asking for 4.1, i am asking for packages compiled

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:37:52AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > i can't think of any serious reason, could you help out a bit? > > getting dangerously close to whining, i really think you are > punishing pre-orderers here. the faq says prefer binary packages. > i'd really like to. What part o

Re: 4.1 packages on the ftp sites

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:37:52AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > i can't think of any serious reason, could you help out a bit? 4.1 isn't released yet.

  1   2   >