On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 01:02:42PM +0100, knitti wrote:
> swap encryption on OpenBSD is done different than what you
> advise. just use a sysctl for vm.swapencrypt.enable. Much less
> maintenance headaches.
>
> an yes, don't complain about being reminded that this is not a
> netbsd / linux suppor
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 01:02:42PM +0100, knitti wrote:
> Gilbert, Douglas,
>
> swap encryption on OpenBSD is done different than what you
> advise. just use a sysctl for vm.swapencrypt.enable. Much less
> maintenance headaches.
besides, since a few releases it has been enabled by default.
Gilbert, Douglas,
swap encryption on OpenBSD is done different than what you
advise. just use a sysctl for vm.swapencrypt.enable. Much less
maintenance headaches.
an yes, don't complain about being reminded that this is not a
netbsd / linux support list.
--knitti
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 05:59:21PM -0800, Jake Conk wrote:
>
> Anyways I don't want to get caught up in that but thanks for your help
> Gilbert, it solved my problem :) You wouldn't happen to know what is
> the equivalent to this for linux machines would you?
Here's my /etc/fstab entry from m
Jake Conk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ultimately it doesn't really matter but I love top posting because it
> goes with the flow of using email.
That is a discussion which has been beaten to death too many times to
matter. One of the better summaries of the pros and cons of various
posting an
Ultimately it doesn't really matter but I love top posting because it
goes with the flow of using email. Usually when people hit reply they
start toping at the top of the email, not the bottom just because
thats about how most of the world uses email and you can keep the
other email replies
Yeah as great as OpenBSD is for some reason there are tons of idiots
on this mailing list that like to get pissed off at you for stupid
things. For instance, I never knew there was a difference between top/
middle/and bottom posting! When I first joined this mailing list I got
flamed so hard
On Dec 7, 2007 4:56 PM, Antoine Jacoutot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
> > c'est hallucinant de voir que l'un des meilleur os
> > disponibles rassemble autant de connards pretentieux
> > qui ont rien d'autre a fouttre que d'emmerder les
> > gens qui tente
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
c'est hallucinant de voir que l'un des meilleur os
disponibles rassemble autant de connards pretentieux
qui ont rien d'autre a fouttre que d'emmerder les
gens qui tentent d'apporter de l'aide aux autres.
vous avez que ca a fouttre bande de cons.
Go a
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 04:28:27PM -0800, Greg Thomas wrote:
> So why bother posting that???
on my laptop i use screen. every machine i use
(netbsd, openbsd, debian..) has its console there,
so i can talk to each machine and each os from
one machine with ease. when i did post that line,
i thought
On Dec 7, 2007 4:08 PM, Gilbert Fernandes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 04:02:15PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> > > In my fstab I have :
> > >
> > > /dev/cgd0b noneswap sw 0 0
> >
> > and you are not running openbsd.
>
> the machine which is hosting mutt is no
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 04:02:15PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > In my fstab I have :
> >
> > /dev/cgd0b noneswap sw 0 0
>
> and you are not running openbsd.
the machine which is hosting mutt is not
my soekris is (openbsd 4.2)
the chmod should do the trick (1777)
--
unzip ; str
On 12/7/07, Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my fstab I have :
>
> /dev/cgd0b noneswap sw 0 0
and you are not running openbsd.
On Dec 7, 2007 5:06 PM, Jake Conk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I have it so that anyone can write to the directory when the
> computer starts up?
The answer to your question is in "man mount_mfs":
"If the -P file option is not used,
the owner and mode of the created mfs file syste
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:06:05PM -0800, Jake Conk wrote:
> Ok so I added that entry and it worked fine except for one problem and that
> is root only had permissions to write to that directory so some services
> did not start up properly. I then gave the /tmp directory 0777 with chmod
> and r
On Dec 7, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:57:47PM -0800, Jake Conk wrote:
I want to put my /tmp partition in RAM and I got the following
example
from the fstab's man page:
swap /tmp mfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=153600 0 0
The problem is that I don't want to
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:18:24PM +, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:57:47PM -0800, Jake Conk wrote:
>
> > I want to put my /tmp partition in RAM and I got the following example
> > from the fstab's man page:
> >
> > swap /tmp mfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=153600 0 0
> >
>
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:57:47PM -0800, Jake Conk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to put my /tmp partition in RAM and I got the following example
> from the fstab's man page:
>
> swap /tmp mfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=153600 0 0
>
> The problem is that I don't want to have any swap in RAM, only my /tm
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:57:47PM -0800, Jake Conk wrote:
> I want to put my /tmp partition in RAM and I got the following example
> from the fstab's man page:
>
> swap /tmp mfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=153600 0 0
>
> The problem is that I don't want to have any swap in RAM, only my /tmp
> partit
Hello,
I want to put my /tmp partition in RAM and I got the following example
from the fstab's man page:
swap /tmp mfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=153600 0 0
The problem is that I don't want to have any swap in RAM, only my /tmp
partition so I'm wondering if I simply remove the "swap" entry from
th
20 matches
Mail list logo
