thus Constantine A. Murenin spake:
I didn't know that Linux has such an ugly dmesgs. Please, resist from
posting them on this list, they hurt my screen. :)
they just mirror the (ugly) internals of Linux ;)
I didn't know that Linux has such an ugly dmesgs. Please, resist from
posting them on this list, they hurt my screen. :)
On 11/05/06, Timo Schoeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thus Robert spake:
> Timo Schoeler wrote:
>> thus Robert spake:
>>> Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Alexander Farber spake
* Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-12 06:35]:
> On Friday 12 May 2006 02:58, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > These are, uh, quite large operations, and if there's a way to reduce
> > IP address use by 3/4 without putting a bunch of customers in the same
> > subnet that's probably a good thing.
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Lars Hansson
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 12:26 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: FYI, 1and1 hosting fun (ip subnet zero)
On Friday 12 May 2006 02:58, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> These are, uh, quite large operations, an
On Friday 12 May 2006 02:58, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> These are, uh, quite large operations, and if there's a way to reduce
> IP address use by 3/4 without putting a bunch of customers in the same
> subnet that's probably a good thing.
Wouldnt that be what VLAN's are for?
---
Lars Hansson
Robert wrote:
> Alexander Farber wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I probably have a similar setup at strato.de and use Kili's trick:
>>
>>h754815:afarber {103} cat /etc/hostname.fxp0
>>inet 81.169.186.95 255.255.255.255 NONE
>>!route add 81.169.186.1 -link \$if: -interface
>>
>> See the explanati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Timo Schoeler wrote:
>
>
> IDE. puke. 'ExelStore'. wtf? i wouldn't give such hardware to my
> enemies. ;D
You're right with ExelStore ;)
Anyway, my server at strato is running fine for 2,5 years now. FreeBSD
5.2.1, 5.3, 6.0, 6.1 ;)
But I do have t
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 08:55:20PM +0200, Robert wrote:
> > I probably have a similar setup at strato.de and use Kili's trick:
[...]
> >!route add 81.169.186.1 -link \$if: -interface
[...]
> Using .0 netmask works, but won't allow traffic with other hosts in the
> same subnet. (Which shouldn't
thus Robert spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Robert spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Alexander Farber spake:
Do you see any kernel output at all? I believe one
should always see at least the boot> prompt -
unless the serial speed of the console doesn't match
Do you see the boot> prompt and h
Farrell
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: FYI, 1and1 hosting fun (ip subnet zero)
On 2006/05/11 13:28, Dan Farrell wrote:
> Geez network setups just shouldn't be that strained... I mean, what
> happened to hooking up a server with a /30 connection to the nearest
> router? Am I missing s
thus Robert spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Alexander Farber spake:
Do you see any kernel output at all? I believe one
should always see at least the boot> prompt -
unless the serial speed of the console doesn't match
Do you see the boot> prompt and have you tried "verbose"?
On 5/11/06, Robe
Comments to Strato:
I used Yaifo to install OpenBSD on STRATO.
And I used the Netmask 255.255.0.0.
I forgot to change Yaifo so I had to rename my installsets to *38.tgz. :))
Here`s a DMESG (Server is from an older offer):
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006
[EMAIL PROTE
Robert wrote:
> Alexander Farber wrote:
>> Do you see any kernel output at all? I believe one
>> should always see at least the boot> prompt -
>> unless the serial speed of the console doesn't match
>>
>> Do you see the boot> prompt and have you tried "verbose"?
>>
>
> The machine doesn't come up.
Timo Schoeler wrote:
> thus Alexander Farber spake:
>> Do you see any kernel output at all? I believe one
>> should always see at least the boot> prompt -
>> unless the serial speed of the console doesn't match
>>
>> Do you see the boot> prompt and have you tried "verbose"?
>>
>> On 5/11/06, Robert
> Geez network setups just shouldn't be that strained... I mean, what
> happened to hooking up a server with a /30 connection to the nearest
> router? Am I missing something?
>
> Dan Farrell
Depends on the fact if you may "wanna sniff" or not... :-)
Kind regards,
Sebastian
--
Don't buy anything
Alexander Farber wrote:
> Do you see any kernel output at all? I believe one
> should always see at least the boot> prompt -
> unless the serial speed of the console doesn't match
>
> Do you see the boot> prompt and have you tried "verbose"?
>
The machine doesn't come up. No boot prompt.
stty is
(keeping cross-post of original poster because I
don't have a better idea)
Todd T. Fries dixit:
>The problem is that 1and1 hosting choses to have any root servers
>setup with `ip subnet zero'. That's a fancy way of stating that they
>expect systems to setup IP's with netmasks of 255.255.255.255
thus Alexander Farber spake:
Do you see any kernel output at all? I believe one
should always see at least the boot> prompt -
unless the serial speed of the console doesn't match
Do you see the boot> prompt and have you tried "verbose"?
On 5/11/06, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexander F
Do you see any kernel output at all? I believe one
should always see at least the boot> prompt -
unless the serial speed of the console doesn't match
Do you see the boot> prompt and have you tried "verbose"?
On 5/11/06, Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexander Farber wrote:
>h754815:afar
On 2006/05/11 13:28, Dan Farrell wrote:
> Geez network setups just shouldn't be that strained... I mean, what
> happened to hooking up a server with a /30 connection to the nearest
> router? Am I missing something?
These are, uh, quite large operations, and if there's a way to reduce
IP address u
Alexander Farber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I probably have a similar setup at strato.de and use Kili's trick:
>
>h754815:afarber {103} cat /etc/hostname.fxp0
>inet 81.169.186.95 255.255.255.255 NONE
>!route add 81.169.186.1 -link \$if: -interface
>
> See the explanation at http://www.dettu
Hello,
I probably have a similar setup at strato.de and use Kili's trick:
h754815:afarber {103} cat /etc/hostname.fxp0
inet 81.169.186.95 255.255.255.255 NONE
!route add 81.169.186.1 -link \$if: -interface
See the explanation at http://www.dettus.net/
Regards
Alex
PS: I wonder if any
ECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 11:02 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: FYI, 1and1 hosting fun (ip subnet zero)
*cut*
Once I set up a Serve rat a very moronic and clueless Hoster (Strato)
wich
used/uses the same Setup.
Depends on their Network you may wann
*cut*
Once I set up a Serve rat a very moronic and clueless Hoster (Strato) wich
used/uses the same Setup.
Depends on their Network you may wanna try 255.255.0.0 or 255.255.255.0. :)
fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:00:aa:77:cc:22
groups: egress
media: Ethernet autosele
I've been told that this is in the archives, but I couldn't find it, so I
re-invented it and am presenting it here for anyone else who may find
themselves in a similarly frustrating situation.
The problem is that 1and1 hosting choses to have any root servers
setup with `ip subnet zero'. That's a
25 matches
Mail list logo
