Stuart Henderson писал(а) 2024-10-22 11:45:
On 2024-10-19, kasak wrote:
hello misc!
I know that apache has it's own module for cgi execution, but
unfortunately, it works only with mpm_prefork module.
There are two: mod_cgi (what you're talking about) and mod_cgid (uses a
seoarate
On 2024-10-19, kasak wrote:
> hello misc!
>
> I know that apache has it's own module for cgi execution, but
> unfortunately, it works only with mpm_prefork module.
There are two: mod_cgi (what you're talking about) and mod_cgid (uses a
seoarate daemon and works with a mul
hello misc!
I know that apache has it's own module for cgi execution, but
unfortunately, it works only with mpm_prefork module.
So, the question is: is it possible to forward requests to slowcgi?
I've tried this configuration ( basically this is a copy of similar
php-
> On Jul 16, 2024, at 05:16, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024-07-15, J Doe wrote:
>> I know in the past (before OpenBSD's httpd), the Apache package on
>> OpenBSD was packaged to run in a chroot. Does this still hold for
>> Apache 2.4.61 on OpenBSD 7.5 ?
>
On 2024-07-15, J Doe wrote:
> I know in the past (before OpenBSD's httpd), the Apache package on
> OpenBSD was packaged to run in a chroot. Does this still hold for
> Apache 2.4.61 on OpenBSD 7.5 ?
The version of Apache httpd (1.x) that used to be in the base OS (before
it was rep
Hi list,
I know in the past (before OpenBSD's httpd), the Apache package on
OpenBSD was packaged to run in a chroot. Does this still hold for
Apache 2.4.61 on OpenBSD 7.5 ?
Thanks,
- J
Hi Stuart,
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 23:20 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> On 2022-11-07, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm working on some patches/features for NSD. One of the new
> > features
> > uses some Apache 2.0 li
:
https://www.openbsd.org/policy.htmlhttps://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=HEAD
Some of the tools I depend on are licensed Apache/GPL, etc, but not in OpenBSD
base.
Hope that helps.
https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/src/share/misc/license.template?rev=HEAD
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at
Hi Jeroen,
On 2022-11-07, Jeroen Koekkoek wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm working on some patches/features for NSD. One of the new features
> uses some Apache 2.0 licensed code (for now).
>
> Sorry to ask this question, but just to verify:
>
> * OpenBSD-base cannot includ
Hi All,
I'm working on some patches/features for NSD. One of the new features
uses some Apache 2.0 licensed code (for now).
Sorry to ask this question, but just to verify:
* OpenBSD-base cannot include any software licensed under Apache 2.0.
* Software in the ports collection is allowed
reads library?
Have you tried searching the ports tree patch files for mention of the
function. You may find a real world example of a workaround.
Edgar
DETAILS:
I wanted to see if Apache Guacamole would compile on OpenBSD to server
as a remote desktop gateway.
It hasn't been too hard to get
t;
Have you tried searching the ports tree patch files for mention of the
function. You may find a real world example of a workaround.
Edgar
> DETAILS:
> I wanted to see if Apache Guacamole would compile on OpenBSD to server
> as a remote desktop gateway.
>
> It hasn't been
Hi,
Should this be on ports@? I'm not working on a port...
TL;DR:
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to work around not having
pthread_mutexattr_setpshared in the OpenBSD pthreads library?
DETAILS:
I wanted to see if Apache Guacamole would compile on OpenBSD to server
as a r
Hi,
Seems like Apache is not using the module, i.e. it treats as text, it needs to
run you php code. I think if you share some relevant parts of your
configuration and prove that you have the necessary tools installed and working
you will get better feedback.
Regards,
George
On July 11
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:40:42PM -0700, mansoor wrote:
> Hi,
> I hope you guys are doing great.
>
> I am using OpenBSD 6.4, apache-httpd-2.4.35, php version 5.6.
> I have disabled default httpd of OpenBSD, now apache2 is showing plain php
> code in browser it doesn't pro
but you don’t seem to even know that this would be the first start to solving
problems..
--
Tony
GPG-FP: 49CC8250 CDCF2183 6209C1AE 625677C1 F7783D5F
Threema: DN8PJX4Z
> On 11. Jul 2019, at 08:40, mansoor wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I hope you guys are doing great.
>
> I am using O
Hi,
I hope you guys are doing great.
I am using OpenBSD 6.4, apache-httpd-2.4.35, php version 5.6.
I have disabled default httpd of OpenBSD, now apache2 is showing plain php
code in browser it doesn't process php at all.
I couldn't find solution to this problem on stackOverflow (or
Hi,
Am 01.11.2018 um 11:40 schrieb Tony Boston:
You should definitely try the relayd(8) route here.
that would be forwarding it to the ip like
match request quick header "Host" value "*some.tld" forward to
but that wouldnt solve something like
RewriteRule ^(.*)http://some.tld/someotherdi
You should definitely try the relayd(8) route here.
> On 1. Nov 2018, at 11:32, Markus Rosjat wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to do like a proxy rewrite like with Apache
> rewrite mod?
>
> RewriteRule ^(.*) http://some.tld/$1 [L,P]
>
Hi all,
I was wondering if it is possible to do like a proxy rewrite like with
Apache rewrite mod?
RewriteRule ^(.*) http://some.tld/$1 [L,P]
So here the P Flag should preserver the original domain in the url and
just proxy the request to the other location (not on the same machine
problem were TLS-asselerated machine response is incomplete.
> I was able to reproduce this on OpenBSD 5.9, 6.0 and 6.1. Test on 5.8 is
> about to be.
>
> Following env I have:
>
> relay1: relayd machine
> web1: apache 2.2.31 serving the request
> client1: requester
>
&g
Hey,
I investigate a problem were TLS-asselerated machine response is incomplete.
I was able to reproduce this on OpenBSD 5.9, 6.0 and 6.1. Test on 5.8 is about
to be.
Following env I have:
relay1: relayd machine
web1: apache 2.2.31 serving the request
client1: requester
relay1 is configured
Apache.
hope this helps,
Bogdan
On Sunday, May 15, 2016 7:15 PM, Chris Bennett
wrote:
I've had to think about it, but since everything I've written is in
mod_perl, I'm going to have to switch over to Apache 2.
Very little perl is written or tested for Apache 1 now,
I've had to think about it, but since everything I've written is in
mod_perl, I'm going to have to switch over to Apache 2.
Very little perl is written or tested for Apache 1 now, so I'm going to
change over to Apache 2.
Thanks for the heads up a while back. It gave me a ch
On 5/9/16 4:26 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2016 15:03:30 -0600, Jeff Ross
wrote:
Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=146186762111571&w=2
Hmm--I went through all of the ports@ messages looking for a removal
announce
On 5/9/16 4:25 PM, Fred wrote:
On 05/09/16 22:58, Jeff Ross wrote:
On 5/9/16 3:21 PM, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
try pkg_add
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/apache-httpd-2.4.20p1.tgz
That's apache 2.4, I want the 1.3.9 version that is, as my subject
On 5/9/16 4:30 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2016-05-09, Jeff Ross wrote:
Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current and it seems the
package is no longer available.
Correct.
Options:
- (preferred) migrate your configuration to a maintained http
server version.
I need
On 2016-05-09, Jeff Ross wrote:
> Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current and it seems the
> package is no longer available.
Correct.
Options:
- (preferred) migrate your configuration to a maintained http
server version.
- install 5.9 release.
- checkout an old version
On 05/09/16 22:58, Jeff Ross wrote:
On 5/9/16 3:21 PM, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
try pkg_add
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/apache-httpd-2.4.20p1.tgz
That's apache 2.4, I want the 1.3.9 version that is, as my subject line
says, apache-httpd-openbsd.
On Mon, 9 May 2016 15:03:30 -0600, Jeff Ross
wrote:
> Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports-cvs&m=146186762111571&w=2
On 5/9/16 3:21 PM, arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
try pkg_add
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/apache-httpd-2.4.20p1.tgz
That's apache 2.4, I want the 1.3.9 version that is, as my subject line
says, apache-httpd-openbsd.
Jeff
try pkg_add
http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/apache-httpd-2.4.20p1.tgz
Hi all,
Trying to install apache-httpd-openbsd in -current and it seems the
package is no longer available. I cvs uped my src and ports and built
the system from source but when I try to install apache-httpd-openbsd
from ports I'm getting the "reading plist|Error: unknown fragment
I did and haven't had any problems.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 11:40 PM, Dan Farrell wrote:
>
> Except that you state it as something people should include as part of
> their proper configuration.
>
> Really? They should give Ted Unangst's account access to procmap?
>
>
> Dan
>
Except that you state it as something people should include as part of
their proper configuration.
Really? They should give Ted Unangst's account access to procmap?
Dan
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:19 PM, bruce wrote:
> I didn't, that's direct from the man page for doas.conf
>
> > On February 1,
I didn't, that's direct from the man page for doas.conf
> On February 1, 2016 at 12:16 AM Bernd Schoeller wrote:
>
>
> On 30/01/16 21:10, bruce wrote:
> > I've been working on this for several weeks now.
> > Results with instructions can be seen here:
> > http://tonyevil.zapto.org/serendipity/
>
On 30/01/16 21:10, bruce wrote:
I've been working on this for several weeks now.
Results with instructions can be seen here:
http://tonyevil.zapto.org/serendipity/
Any feedback welcome.
httpd is too new for this to be well documented, so here is my small
contribution.
Beyond the usual problems
I've been working on this for several weeks now.
Results with instructions can be seen here:
http://tonyevil.zapto.org/serendipity/
Any feedback welcome.
httpd is too new for this to be well documented, so here is my small
contribution.
hot packages have this, but if you're on 5.8, the diff to the port is
> the best option.
>
>
Thanks Stuart. I am on the 5.8 release. Just pulled down the ports tree
from -stable and did a `make update` in `ports/www/apache2-httpd`.
(The diff seems to have been applied in -stable.) Apache is now running
fine with mod_cgid.
I appreciate the quick help.
On 2016-01-03, Lawrence Wieser wrote:
> Claudio Jeker diehard.n-r-g.com> writes:
>
>> You may try to build your own version with adding --enable-cgi in the
>> Makefile configure flags. It seems that even configure tells that
>> --enable-cgi is the default it seems it is not. Go figure...
>>
>> A
Claudio Jeker diehard.n-r-g.com> writes:
> You may try to build your own version with adding --enable-cgi in the
> Makefile configure flags. It seems that even configure tells that
> --enable-cgi is the default it seems it is not. Go figure...
>
> Also mod_cgid.so should be built but seems to be
Hi Claudio,
On Fri 23/10/2015 22:47, Claudio Jeker wrote:
[...]
> You may try to build your own version with adding --enable-cgi in the
> Makefile configure flags. It seems that even configure tells that
> --enable-cgi is the default it seems it is not. Go figure...
>
> Also mod_cgid.so should be
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 07:20:43PM +0200, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
> Dear misc@ reader,
>
> I've just upgraded my home server to 5.8, so I switched to apache 2.4
> (from 2.2); the problem is that my git server no longer works and the
> root cause seems to be that ht
> On 22 Feb 2015, at 20:23, Romain FABBRI
> wrote:
>
> I've managed to configure the new httpd server to use as a replacement for
> apache. (With is really great. Thanks to Reyk !)
>
> I'm strugling to make my drupal site work, because of the clean url
: sven falempin [mailto:sven.falem...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : dimanche 22 février 2015 19:08
à : Romain FABBRI
Cc : misc
Objet : Re: Emulate apache mod_rewrite feature with new httpd
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Romain FABBRI
mailto:romain.fab...@alienconsulting.net>>
wrote:
I've
dimanche 22 février 2015 19:08
> *Ã :* Romain FABBRI
> *Cc :* misc
> *Objet :* Re: Emulate apache mod_rewrite feature with new httpd
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Romain FABBRI <
> romain.fab...@alienconsulting.net> wrote:
>
> I&#x
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Romain FABBRI <
romain.fab...@alienconsulting.net> wrote:
> I've managed to configure the new httpd server to use as a replacement for
> apache. (With is really great. Thanks to Reyk !)
>
> I'm strugling to make my drupal site wo
I've managed to configure the new httpd server to use as a replacement for
apache. (With is really great. Thanks to Reyk !)
I'm strugling to make my drupal site work, because of the clean url module.
I used to have the following apache mod_rewrite configuration :
RewriteEngine on
R
t;developer attention" caveat applies as with
> >apache)
>
> This might be a reasonable choice, especially if the CMS you're looking
> at already documents how to use it with nginx.
>
We already got some of the most common CMS / web things working. But
I'm int
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:41:26PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-12-29, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> > Given the current state of development in OpenBSD, I'm now wondering
> > what the best way forward is for me:
> >
> > a) Install apache-httpd-openbsd from
I'll answer to this one, but I'll start with a big thanks to all who
responded - some interesting points were made!
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:41:26PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> apache-httpd-openbsd is a dead-end, it's not actively developed, ssl
> support is poor, thir
On 2014-12-29, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> Given the current state of development in OpenBSD, I'm now wondering
> what the best way forward is for me:
>
> a) Install apache-httpd-openbsd from ports and keep my configuration
>basically as is
>Advantage: Less work to get ev
rock wrote:
b) Migrate to nginx
This seems to be the least interesting option - not only do I have to
migrate now, but once more in the future, as nginx is also on the way
out (so, the same "developer attention" caveat applies as with
apache)
nginx hasn't disappeared entirely. It&#x
emga...@gmx.net (T. Ribbrock), 2015.12.29 (Mon) 14:30 (CET):
> Hi all,
>
> I'm finally getting round to updating my home server (gets a fresh 5.6
> install).
>
> Of course, there were a lot of changes over the past versions, one of
> them being the whole apache ->
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 14:30, T. Ribbrock wrote:
>
> b) Migrate to nginx
> This seems to be the least interesting option - not only do I have to
> migrate now, but once more in the future, as nginx is also on the way
> out (so, the same "developer attention" caveat
Hi Thomas,
On 29 December 2014 at 05:30, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm finally getting round to updating my home server (gets a fresh 5.6
> install).
>
> Of course, there were a lot of changes over the past versions, one of
> them being the whole apache ->
AM, T. Ribbrock wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm finally getting round to updating my home server (gets a fresh 5.6
> install).
>
> Of course, there were a lot of changes over the past versions, one of
> them being the whole apache -> nginx -> httpd migration. My web
Hi all,
I'm finally getting round to updating my home server (gets a fresh 5.6
install).
Of course, there were a lot of changes over the past versions, one of
them being the whole apache -> nginx -> httpd migration. My webserver
has a CMS running which requires PHP and MySQL, plus a f
place your existing Perl installation."..snip..
This is not something I want. I want to use OS's Perl distribution with tools
that work directly with standard distribution.
May be it is time to consider the possibility to convert Perl/Apache/mod_perl
scripts to Erlang Yaws/Mochiweb/WebMa
o play with fcgi before
updating, nginx and lighttpd support it natively, and apache via a
module - it isn't something new, it has been around for years, it's
pretty much the only standard way to handle cgi-like scripting in a
non-forking webserver. Config methods differ, but scripts should be
Hi,
thanks for input.
is the new httpd daemon ready for production?
For example is it safe to migrate Perl scripts from Apache 1.3/mod_perl1.3 to
httpd/FastCGI?
Are Perl scripts in FastCGI evaluated in same manner like in mod_perl, or
everytime a script is invoked by the server the Perl
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:24:24AM +, Bogdan Andu wrote:
> 4) will httpd be able to support Perl script processing without the need to
> talk to an external (FasCGI) daemon?
Just my 2c about the new httpd daemon. It's brand new in 5.6, and is
shaping up to be an awesome and simple server. I
On 2014-11-06 09.24.24 +, Bogdan Andu wrote:
> 3) what would be the performance of running Perl scripts through
> FastCGI+httpd, compared to Apache1.3/mod_perl1.3 compared to
> nginx/Nginx perl module?
You need to run these benchmarks yourself, on your scripts and data.
-Mike
[demime 1.01d r
w.
> Removed Apache from base (replaced by nginx(8)).??
There's no confusion. Search archives and/or check undeadly.org.
j.
Hi,
There are some confusing info about which won the base-webserver in OpenBSD:
In 5.6 it seems to be nginx 1.6.0 (http://www.openbsd.org/plus56.html) :
Unhooked httpd(8) from build: use of nginx(8) is encouraged now.
Removed Apache from base (replaced by nginx(8)).Â
and
In current (http
On 06/02/2014 01:10 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2014-06-02, consultor wrote:
>> Hello list
>>
>> Could somebody please tell me if i should be worry for:
>>
>> 185.4.227.194 - - [01/Jun/2014:08:32:14 -0700] "GET
>> http://24x7-allrequestsallowed.com/?PHPSESSID=1rxsxtj500143SVM%5CRH%40%40BZPU
>
On 2014-06-02, consultor wrote:
> Hello list
>
> Could somebody please tell me if i should be worry for:
>
> 185.4.227.194 - - [01/Jun/2014:08:32:14 -0700] "GET
> http://24x7-allrequestsallowed.com/?PHPSESSID=1rxsxtj500143SVM%5CRH%40%40BZPU
> HTTP/1.1" 200 1723
>
> The answer was 200. Running 5.5
Hello list
Could somebody please tell me if i should be worry for:
185.4.227.194 - - [01/Jun/2014:08:32:14 -0700] "GET
http://24x7-allrequestsallowed.com/?PHPSESSID=1rxsxtj500143SVM%5CRH%40%40BZPU
HTTP/1.1" 200 1723
The answer was 200. Running 5.5 Release.
Thanks all.
francisco.
Em 21-01-2014 23:48, David Sticht escreveu:
> Ted,
>
> Thank you so much for responding. I understand all of the words you
> used. However, this definitely goes beyond what I have done yet. I will
> need for the apache server to instigate the request. I imagine I would
Ted,
Thank you so much for responding. I understand all of the words you
used. However, this definitely goes beyond what I have done yet. I will need
for the apache server to instigate the request. I imagine I would want a vast
majority of the scripting to be run via CGI as normal
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 14:25, David Sticht wrote:
> Understanding the risks I am wanting to either allow the www user right to
> open tty or change the user running the apache daemon. I am developing a
> suite of intranet tools with perl to perform some network diagnostics.
> Does an
www user right to
> open tty or change the user running the apache daemon. I am developing a
> suite of intranet tools with perl to perform some network diagnostics. Does
> anybody have a suggestion to move me in the right direction?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
Understanding the risks I am wanting to either allow the www user right to open
tty or change the user running the apache daemon. I am developing a suite of
intranet tools with perl to perform some network diagnostics. Does anybody have
a suggestion to move me in the right direction?
Sent from
ing the ISO file looks like ~40 MByte, but the reality
>> is 4 GBytes. What could the problem be?
storing file sizes in insufficiently sized data types..
httpd in base was patched to allow larger files to be sent, but that
didn't extend to directory listings.
>> Or I should use
On 10/15/2013 11:43 AM, obsd, cgi wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/9SJOrhq.png
In the directory listing the ISO file looks like ~40 MByte, but the reality
is 4 GBytes. What could the problem be? Or I should use nginx since apache
will be obsolete? :)
Thanks!
More a known design limitation than a
http://i.imgur.com/9SJOrhq.png
In the directory listing the ISO file looks like ~40 MByte, but the reality
is 4 GBytes. What could the problem be? Or I should use nginx since apache
will be obsolete? :)
Thanks!
ttempt to look for the answer of this issue as I'd
> thought). The link was at
> http://philihp.com/blog/2008/connecting-to-mysql-with-php-in-apache-on-openbsd/
> (2008? Certainly I must not have googled as well as I thought!),
> and referred to a permanent (al
I was
upgrading my system from OpenBSD 4.x to 5.0. I'm not sure if it was
on this mailing list or not, but this seems like the most appropriate
place to bring it up.
I had relied on several services via Apache that utilize PHP & MySQL
in a fairly standard configuration. Unfortunately, whe
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Tito Mari Francis Escaño
wrote:
> Good day,
> On a recent project, I was trying to build Apache Cocoon 2.1.12 from
> source. I have already successfully installed JRE and JDK 1.7 and already
> ran Tomcat 7.x on it, with the objective of building and ru
Good day,
On a recent project, I was trying to build Apache Cocoon 2.1.12 from
source. I have already successfully installed JRE and JDK 1.7 and already
ran Tomcat 7.x on it, with the objective of building and running Apache
Cocoon on it, currently without success.
The message I get is as follows
Sorry, had some guests over the weekend, and I was unable to continue
with the thread for a bit. I hope you guys are willing to catch up
where you left off, I still haven't been able to get apache+php+mysql
working again on my server since the 4.9-5.0 upgrade, and I really need
my wiki and
you, etc.
It's like the message you are getting - something is up with the mysql
extension in your install.
Check the ini files, etc.
You are using the base Apache and PHP is working - you need to look at
the mysql extension and find out why it is not enabled or not loading.
Okay, now I've got the phpinfo output. Nothing is jumpin' out at me,
if y'all care to take a look at it I've got it available at
bismaninfo.hopto.org/debug.php for a limited time here.
Nope, I caught the PHP upgrade instructions and I believe they've been
carried out
correctly. :(
On 05/23/13 11:44, Damon Getsman wrote:
Bryan, after doing that it appears that it's not even getting executed.
I put the script into a web accessible file called debug.php, loaded
it in my browser and saw a blank page. Viewing the source is
showing the original , leading me to believe that it i
IIRC 4.9-5.0 was a little ugly, maybe you missed the PHP upgrade
instructions here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade50.html#Pkgup
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Damon Getsman wrote:
> Bryan, after doing that it appears that it's not even getting executed.
> I put the script into a web acce
And, um, wrapping the snippet in the appropriate
didn't seem to help matters at all, either. :(
Bryan, after doing that it appears that it's not even getting executed.
I put the script into a web accessible file called debug.php, loaded
it in my browser and saw a blank page. Viewing the source is
showing the original , leading me to believe that it is
not even handing it off to the appropria
Richard:
Not sure if I'm using the base apache or 2.2. Here's what
httpd -V is showing me:
Wed May 22 17:50
contract:~$ httpd -V
Server version: Apache/1.3.29 (Unix)
Server's Module Magic Number: 19990320:15
Server compiled with
-D EAPI
-D HAVE_MMAP
-D HAVE_SHMGET
-D USE_
lling.
My primary server was a 4.9 installation, and it was running
apache, with PHP and MySQL integrated for the purpose of serving a
mediawiki, a gallery2 installation, and a few other utilities that I
have had up for myself and some friends. Unfortunately, ever since I've
made the leap f
ation, and it was running
apache, with PHP and MySQL integrated for the purpose of serving a
mediawiki, a gallery2 installation, and a few other utilities that I
have had up for myself and some friends. Unfortunately, ever since I've
made the leap from 4.9 to 5.0, I've been unable to get
good place for start http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq10.html#httpdchroot
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:07 AM, wrote:
> I want to avoid using Apache 2.x for my server and want a chroot but where
> users can have their own webpages. It doesn't need to be automated I'm
> happy to edi
I want to avoid using Apache 2.x for my server and want a chroot but where
users can have their own webpages. It doesn't need to be automated I'm
happy to edit httpd.conf to add each virtual server. I'd also like php to
run as that user, can I run php via cgi on Apache 1.3?
___
> From: Stuart
> Henderson
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Friday, April 5,
> 2013 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: default apache consumes memory
>
> Sounds like a
> memory leak (allocated memory not getting freed), I would
> think the most
> likely pl
.
Thank you
for the link,
Bogdan
From: Stuart
Henderson
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Friday, April 5,
2013 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: default apache consumes memory
Sounds like a
memory leak (allocated memory not getting freed), I would
think the most
likely place
might hide (but not fix)
the problem.
On 2013-04-05, Bogdan Andu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an OpenBSD box running default apache server� that its sole
> task is to present data, nothing more, nothing less.
>
> The logic of the
> applications is handled by an app. layer that n
Hello,
I have an OpenBSD box running default apache server that its sole
task is to present data, nothing more, nothing less.
The logic of the
applications is handled by an app. layer that never exceeds 40 Mbytes RAM and
handles concurently all the connections (tcp based) from apache children
80
> received-on $int_if nat-to $int_if
>
>
> W dniu 01.03.2013 06:07, Matt Morrow pisze:
> > I have pf running on an openbsd box handling port forwarding. All ports
> > seem to forward ok except for port 80.
> >
> > Apache is running on a slackware box. I can ac
$int_if proto tcp from $int_if:network to any port 80
received-on $int_if nat-to $int_if
W dniu 01.03.2013 06:07, Matt Morrow pisze:
> I have pf running on an openbsd box handling port forwarding. All ports
> seem to forward ok except for port 80.
>
> Apache is running on a slackwar
mple, I have ssh on 6699 and I can access that both internally and
> externally.
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Andy Bradford
> wrote:
>
> > Thus said Matt Morrow on Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:07:30 -0600:
> >
> > > Apache is running on a slackware box. I can ac
1 - 100 of 1142 matches
Mail list logo
