Thanks for the rapid response and proposal.
I'd wanted to test yesterday but had to postpone.
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 12:18 PM Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Here is a possible solution where a perfect match aborts the detection
> loop. Now this only works if the labels are in the right order ("in"
> befo
While diagnosing an unrelated matter, I find that 'bgpctl show rib'
has difficulty with the 'in' keyword. The 'out' counterpart works as
expected. Looking at bgpctl(8), the following should work (but
doesn't):
$ bgpctl show rib in neighbor $peer
ambiguous argument: in
valid commands/args:
invali
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Björn Ketelaars <
bjorn.ketela...@hydroxide.nl> wrote:
> It sounds like that your default inet route is overwritten after dhclient
> on vlan1 is issued.
That's not something I'd expect, given that the dhclient instances should
be in separate routing domains.
Dear list,
as my ISP is migrating to a new network setup, I'm forced to tinker with my
local setup. Unfortunately, I'm struggling to get two interfaces (vlan0,
vlan1) working simultaneously with DHCP.
Separately, they work fine. Together, vlan1 drops my internet connection
(vlan0); the latter won
Though I looked on a 5.3 system, rc.conf(8) suggests the following:
"It is advisable to leave rc.conf untouched, and instead create and edit a
new rc.conf.local file."
That's rather different from creating a copy. From a brief look at CVS,
it's the same for -current.
Regards,
Rogier
On Sun, Fe
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, mxb wrote:
> Tried to tag pkts on $int_if ? Eg
>
match in on $if_int from ($if_int:network) to $pbx_net tag PBX
>
Yes and that works. But shouldn't it already be covered by the 'PBX' tag in
ipsec.conf?
That's what I expected and what I'm trying to figure out.
Th
A kind soul (thank you) suggested I add the following to my ruleset:
pass quick on enc0 proto ipencap
Unfortunately, that does still not allow the inner outbound traffic to pass.
>From what I can tell, the original ruleset already let ipencap traffic pass
on enc0. I verified with tcpdump and
Dear list,
after re-installing a machine with 5.3 (i386), I wanted to tighten up the
filtering rules. To that end, I added a 'block log' rule near the top of my
rules. This appears to be unexpectedly effective.
I'm having trouble with my IPsec VPN to a VoIP PBX. Although my SAs come up
as expecte
Apologies for the delayed follow-up; I was unable to test over the weekend.
I plugged in both fibres this afternoon. With the diff, the hardware
appears to be correctly initialized. Both ports properly find their link.
Light testing today shows no surprises.
Any particular things I should test ad
Hi Jonathan,
thanks for the diff. Currently building a kernel with it and will report
back.
Regards,
Rogier
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:51:45PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > after installing
Dear list,
after installing a dual-port fibre NIC, it seems the card is recognized,
but fails to initalize. The card in question is an i350-F2. I've upgraded
to the latest snapshot to see if there's any improvement, but alas.
em0 at pci8 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I350 Fiber" rev 0x01: msiem0: Hard
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> I guess you missed the subsequent put back yesterday. :)
Guilty as charged.
> [...] com2 renumbers any other pci attached com ports from the likes of
puc.
I suppose for those running tools such as conserver, this would mean
changing the conf
Out of curiosity, after seeing the commit and subsequent backing out of
this change, what'd be the expected issues with enabling com2 that require
more thought?
Regards,
Rogier
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 02:06, Rogier Krieg
Dear list,
in an attempt to save on serial cabling for our machines, I'm trying
to see if IPMI Serial over Lan (SOL) works as advertised.
For our Dell boxes, things seem to work, but our SuperMicro boards
(X7SPA-HF and X8ST3-F) require extra work. The latter seem to insist
on using com2 (i.e. COM
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> accept for any relay via my.isp.smtpserver
iirc, smtpd.conf(5) mentions the host being in URL form, e.g.
smtp://my.isp.smtpserver
At least, it does for my Feb 17th snapshot.
Regards,
Rogier
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
> /etc/mail/smtpd.conf:12: error: invalid url: smtps+auth://mail.split-brain.de
The description of the relay parameter in smtpd.conf(5) is accurate.
It seems the examples section in smtpd.conf(5) is slightly outdated,
however.
The format for
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Martijn van Duren
wrote:
> Jan Stary schreef op zo 30-12-2012 om 12:24 [+0100]:
>> On Dec 30 10:43:00, m.vandu...@jonker.nl wrote:
>> > I'm migrating my data from an ext3 partition [...]
> That is correct. And I mounted it mount_ext2fs /dev/wd0i /mnt.
Why would
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
> Please don't panic.
Naturally, this happens on a day one forgets to bring a towel.
Cheers,
Rogier
Here, it took a few iterations of properly reading the rtadvd.conf(5)
manual, but the various Mac devices over here (OS X v10.6+, iOS v5+)
properly get addresses and DNS servers assigned.
My setup:
Addresses here are assigned over rtadvd(8); DNS information over
DHCPv6. With the recent patch to rt
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Ray Zorthin wrote:
> 2) Do we need to use iked(8) instead of isakmpd(8)?
Instead, you may want to look at npppd and using the L2TP variant
natively available on your iPad. At least, that's how I have an iOS
device connect (v5.1.1 currently, but worked for several
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 21:02, Kostas Zorbadelos wrote:
> The only remaining question is PERC H200 support.
mpii(4) should cover the Dell PERC H200.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:38, T. Valent wrote:
> [dmassage] It's not part of the official OpenBSD or the ports tree.
Are you sure it's not in sysutils/dmassage?
It would seem you're trying to build your own stripped-down kernel.
Doing that sort of thing is typically a "you break it, you get to
Lest I'm mistaken, both serve DNS data, but in different roles.
nsd is for serving authoritative zones, not for resolver work.
unbound is a resolver.
Regards,
Rogier
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 20:11, wrote:
> But again, I insist in my first question: how I get that
> dhclient respect my resolv.conf and do not touch it?
If you insist on dhclient not touching resolv.conf and do not want to
edit the in-base dhclient-script, you can use the 'script' parameter
descr
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 11:54, David Steiner wrote:
> can the upgrade process via bsd.rd be automated?
Yes, see e.g. Yaifo. The link came by earlier this week on the list.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/yaifo/files/yaifo/4.8/yaifo-4.8.tgz/download
Regards,
Rogier
In short: if I'd like to get a RAID5/6 supporting mfi(4) card, what
current LSI/other models would I be looking for? Would that be models
with the LSISAS2108 chip?
The mfi(4) manual states the Dell PERC H700 to be a supported mfi(4)
card. From the Dell documentation, it seems that card holds an
LS
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 01:10, emigrant wrote:
> ipfm dont work well in openbsd 4.6/4.7/4.8, too much changes in pf?(yes, i
> use pf), any ideas what can i do? go back to 4.5? :)
People here are unlikely to recommend going back in OpenBSD versions.
>From the first Google hit on IPFM [1], I get
2010/6/19 Jean-Frangois SIMON :
> # bash /etc/netstart
As others have pointed at, you'll want /bin/sh instead for this case.
When in doubt what to use, review the top line in the script you're
about to execute and use the shell listed there.
> WARNING: /etc/hostname.re0 is insecure, fixing perm
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 17:58, Chris Smith wrote:
> Ran across these Supermicro boxes:
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5015/SYS-5015A-PHF.cfm
If I'm not mistaken it's a system that turned up on the list earlier,
including 4.7 dmesg.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=12707857161
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 22:25, Price, Joe wrote:
> In summary, it sounds like Henning may have fixed it from this post:
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=124955744915786&w=2
>From the message you quoted and seeing r1.655.4.1, it seems the fixes
you refer to made it into 4.6-stable. You may want
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 14:31, jean-francois wrote:
> Is there some basic configuration I missed to do ?
As a quick check, did you start both smbd and nmbd components (ps ax
is your friend here) and did you place the necessary lines in
/etc/rc.local as per the message you received upon install? If
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 06:00, PP;Q Q P(P8P?P8QP8P=
wrote:
> from the network point of view, packets will come from the same MAC an
> IP address (because of CARP), so ... if BACKUP will "just continue to
> maintain a session, established by MASTER", nobody will even know, 1
> sec is nothing in
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 17:26, PP;Q Q P(P8P?P8QP8P=
wrote:
> no, I want routes exactly to carp.
That sounds odd. Routes are something different than what particular
host responds to frames directed to a specific hardware address.
If I understand the rest of your description correctly, you want
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 14:34, nixlists wrote:
> spamd is great, but I need to filter other traffic. I still wonder how
> people manage to download and convert blocklists for loading into pf
If I understand your question and read the spamd-setup(8) man page
correctly, you may want to try your luck
Would the following be an improvement for the documentation? Feel free
to flame my mdoc(7) skills or lack thereof.
Regards,
Rogier
### Eclipse Workspace Patch 1.0
#P man5
Index: core.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/core.5,v
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 00:03, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Making again the test on 4.6 Now I have "bioctl: BIOCCREATERAID: Invalid
> argument" however on a another machine. Am I wrong in any point ?
The kernel complains about invalid metadata, so that may well stop you
from rebuilding your 4.4-softra
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 19:47, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Seems appropriate in the latest man, but did not appear in my man page. The -R
> is'nt available in version 4.4 ? any way to proceed ?
As far as I know, softraid didn't support rebuilds in 4.4; it was
added later. Judging from the man page dif
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 17:51, Jean-Francois wrote:
> Sorry for the so many questions but still manual may not always
> answer to them.
Did you read bioctl(8) and did you try the -R option that man page
mentions? It would seem appropriate for your question.
> How do we make the device become onl
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 15:27, Matthias Pfeifer wrote:
> [...] Then the second:
> this gives me a " cannot create /dev/tun0: Device busy "
If I'm not mistaken, you need separate tun(4) devices per qemu
instance. The reason for that lies in the device being ready for
simultaneous use only by a s
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 07:32, Steve Williams
wrote:
> I have downloaded the current cvs code and compiled it. It exhibits the
> same problem, missing em0.
It seems to nicely detect the hardware, just not liking its EEPROM
contents and stopping initialisation there. While you should take a
develo
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 20:11, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> I'm updating OBSD 4.5-stable to OBSD to 4.6-stable and have a doubt when
> updating ports using this [1] procedure.
The instructions you linked describe how to go from 4.6-release to
4.6-stable, not what you are trying to accomplish (unless y
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 00:14, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> This fixes it. I need to come up with a way to get this in the tree
> without breaking IBM T21.
Indeed it does. Where I originally noticed the problem very quickly
after system startup, it now seems to have disappeared. I still see
acpidump
While trying out a Dell Latitude E6400, I notice sluggish keyboard
behaviour. This occurs both in 4.5 as well as the Oct. 2 snapshot
(-current). In each case, I use the amd64 snapshots. The issues
disappear when disabling ACPI via UKC.
What I see is the following: some keypresses being 'missed',
o
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 01:56, Andrej Elizarov wrote:
> I found this example:
>
> mkdir /var/www/music
> mkdir -p /var/www/var/www
> cd /var/www/var/www
> ln -s /var/www/music music
>
> But in this case all mp3s must be inside ServerRoot. Not good.
You're essentially offering web content. Arguabl
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 22:27, Urban Hillebrand wrote:
> My aploogies for being unclear. Those hosts are all on different
> locations and nets, even belong to different companies.
You could try using tools such as cfengine and/or puppet (both are in
ports) to have them pull in their configuration
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 16:35, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> While trying to get a test Catalyst rig running on my 4.4 machine, I
> am getting bitten by the chroot(2) feature.
While chroot(2) seems to be the issue, the following two things seem
to make it work as desired.
Make /var/www/var
While trying to get a test Catalyst rig running on my 4.4 machine, I
am getting bitten by the chroot(2) feature. Running the following
configuration snippet works fine with httpd_flags="-u" but yields the
following httpd error while using chroot.
The machine is a vanilla 4.4-release amd64 box, run
Dear list,
While reading the manual I am having difficulty figuring out what the
appropriate hostname.if(5) entries should be for the following
(attempted) network setup:
+ Desired subnet: 172.24.10.0/24
+ HP ProCurve 2900-24G; providing (tagged) VLAN 10 on a physical port
+ bnx0 physical parent i
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 21:08, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should be in rc.conf.local?
If I'm not mistaken [1], you will only see a change in
/etc/rc.conf.local if you select 'no' for starting sshd by default.
To the OP:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:28 AM, elflord woods <[EMAIL PROT
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 09:58, my mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so i can use ldap with bdb backends in OpenBSD 4.4 eh?
Take a look at the port's Makefile [1] which apparently will be in
4.4-release. Excerpt below to save you the searching. If you intended
your remark as sarcasm, it's more likel
If I'm not mistaken, there has already been a thread [1] on this,
including an explanation
[2] of the various considerations involved.
1. MARC.info - OpenBSD-misc - Thread 'BSD Documentation License?'
http://marc.info/?t=12061249355&r=1&w=2
2. MARC.info - OpenBSD-misc - Nick Holland - 'Re: BS
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is the device you expect to provide disks, the only obvious
> candidate I see, it is not currently supported in the RAMDISK_CD
> kernel if at all.
>From a quick glance at pciide(4), I suppose it should work
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Khalid Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running openbsd 4.0 and apache 1.3 . I've loads of virtual hosts on
> apache and I'm now running apache from rc.conf.local with:
> httpd_flads "-u -DSSL" .
That probably is a typo and in your rc.conf.local it would rea
In hopes of preventing your ending up singed and blackened around the edges...
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:18 PM, macintoshzoom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How to HIDE "OpenBSD" as user-agent?
>
> For security reasons it is sometimes interesting to hide GLOBALLLY th
> O.S. you are running on [...
he mpi driver
also support bioctl? If not, I know
what sort of equipment to avoid on a bunch of new servers.
Thanks in advance,
Rogier Krieger
References:
1. NYCBSDCon 2006 - Marco Peereboom - "Bio and Sensors in OpenBSD"
http://www.openbsd.org/papers/bio.pdf
2. OpenBSD CVSweb - /sr
On Feb 16, 2008 8:59 AM, Matthieu Herrb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2008 5:31 PM, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Upon 'make build', the directory lib/fontconfig errors out on not
> > being able to find freetype-config.
>
> yo
On 10/23/07, Boris Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's always better to don't run a demon if you don't have to. :)
That sort of remark has often started endless debates. :)
For me, trusting rdate to provide time or using ntpd for it is pretty
much the same, but feel free to disagree. The
On 10/23/07, Chris Kuethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rdate provides a single valuable service: the ability to poll a device
> to see what time it thinks it is (ie. probing the health of my time servers).
Good point; I should probably add that to my monitoring setup.
Thanks for the suggestion,
On 10/23/07, Boris Goldberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't really need ntpd on all systems. One (timeserver) runs ntpd,
> and others use rdate, called from cron (once a day is usually enough).
While your suggestion would work, it would also entail more work
without adding benefit. Upon
On 7/10/07, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If my clients (MIT KfW, SecureCRT) attempt GSSAPI authentication,
[...] OpenSSH does not obtain any AFS token, forcing me to run
afslog manually.
Or put such a command in /etc/ssh/sshrc, as hinted at in sshd(8). This
seems to work i
As someone kind made me realise in an off-list reply, I should have
included my sshd_config on the machine in question. I should further
note that it is a 3.9-stable machine (although I did not spot changes
relating to the OpenSSH behaviour regarding GSSAPI for the versions
included with 4.0/4.1).
Dear list,
While fiddling around to move my home directories onto AFS, I notice a
bit of interesting behaviour. At a first glance, everything seems just
fine. When logging in through the Krb5 mechanism (as defined in
login.conf), OpenSSH nicely obtains an AFS token for me. Use case:
Windows SSH c
On 6/4/07, Edgars Makra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With one such non passable smtp server admin we tested it via phone. He
said that promt is very slow (as it should be), then he got 451 Temp
error. After 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes he retried, nothing :(
If you tried connecting by manually perfor
On 5/28/07, Woodchuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder if this setup will allow you to do dhcp. Probably during
boot, (before it takes effect, when the rules in /etc/rc are active),
but afterwards, not.
Typically, dhclient(8) uses the bpf(4) devices and is not troubled by
PF's ruleset. If I
On an older piece of hardware (PII-300) running 4.0-release running
local storage at my parents', I experience FFS-related panics when
writing files to the secondary HDD [wd1] (connected to a separate SATA
controller [pciide1]).
Since I lacked a console cable, I copied the trace and ps informatio
On 4/7/07, Merp.com Volunteer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I used the directions from eclectica here:
http://www.eclectica.ca/howto/openbsd-software-raid-howto.php
To be blunt: you are using old (3.7) instructions that are not from
the OpenBSD project, that involve compiling your own kernel (see
On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect their
licence.
That said, there are more ways than one to protect one's licence. It
hardly seems unreasonable to privately co
On 3/23/07, carlopmart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My problem is wih pf rules. If I put on pf.conf "pass all", all works ok.
Then the easiest debugging feature is doing a tcpdump on pflog0 for
blocked packets. Assuming (without your pf.conf, it's hard to guess)
you use a default block, add a log
On 3/23/07, carlopmart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do I need to open additional ports or protocols??
Not so much additional ports or protocols, but are you sure you
enabled X11 forwarding?
A few suggestions for things to check:
+ in /etc/ssh/sshd_config, did you enable 'X11Forwarding' ?
+ for t
. Being a spamd user myself, I use the following exception
list for Gmail's mail server pool:
64.233.162.192/28
64.233.170/24
64.233.182.192/28
Sincerely,
Rogier Krieger
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 23, 2007 6:39
On 2/21/07, Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 10:22, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> Personally, I'm having trouble using login-ldap with my local(host)
> LDAP server using SSL.
ftl2# more /etc/openldap/ldap.conf
TLS_CACERT /etc/ssl/c
On 2/21/07, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PMFJI, but could you clarify that? Requiring local accounts totally
defeats the purpose of an LDAP server.
Yes, it does. In fact, it is clearly documented in the login-ldap port
materials.
You may get around said local accounts requirement i
On 2/20/07, Jimmy Mdkeld | Loopia AB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rogier Krieger wrote:
> End user connections are what the submission port (589) is for.
# grep submission /etc/services
submission 587/tcp
submission 587/udp
As I ment to say, port 587 ;)
Apparently, it is ti
On 2/20/07, J Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was under the impression that spamd was supposed to "politely" defer
connections from unknown/greylisted hosts.
Given the '451' response in the SMTP conversation, it is a relatively
polite and benign way to defer connections. I doubt a sending MT
On 2/12/07, Artyom Goryainov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp from {!$me, !$mynet} to $ext_if port 80
You will probably want to see the PF FAQ [1] on this, specifically the
section on Lists and Macros. It tells you why you should use tables
for this purpose. The l
On 1/24/07, Jonathan Eifrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
tftpd[]: oack: Permission denied
That may have something to do with *file* permissions. Quoting tftpd(8):
"The use of tftp(1) does not require an account or password on the remote
system. Due to the lack of authentication information,
On 1/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We would then like to access that data from our
mainframe via ODBC to retreive the records.
Since it's not really clear to me what you intend to so, I am assuming
the following:
+ Your mainframe runs a Windows platform
+ Your OpenBSD machi
Just a quick guess.
On 11/30/06, Brendan Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can't install php5-core-5.1.4p1-hardened because of conflicts
(php5-core-5.1.4p1)
Try to delete the conflicting package (php5-core) first. You already
seem to have it installed, blocking the installation for your
diff
On 11/2/06, Josh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Following the man release page [...]
Could you elaborate on what branch (-release, -stable, -current) and
version you're trying to build 4.0 on? And of course: which 4.0 branch
are you trying to build?
If it's not working, try the regular binary upgr
This *really* is something you should have looked up in the archives.
Browse those for more information. The archive is your friend.
On 10/16/06, Jay Jesus Amorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does openbsd 4.0 supports intel ac'97 modem and intel ipw2200 on laptop?
In short: don't expect Winmodem
On 10/13/06, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for pointing me to bioctl - I was unaware about that - but I
don't offhand see how I could eg. collect SMART status on the drives
hanging off such a card.
IIRC, you cannot collect the SMART status on individual drives.
Personally, I do
On 10/13/06, Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] whether I should stick with RAIDframe [...] or if I should go for
hardware RAID instead [...]
Personally, I find using hardware RAID a lot easier. You can stick
with GENERIC kernels and have fewer problems on installing/upgrading.
For m
On one of my older P2 machines (running 3.9-stable), I seem to have a
very persistent fsck error: "BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS". Regardless
of whether or not I choose to salvage these, I keep getting the error
below.
The error occurs on an unmounted file system. After choosing to
salvage, seems to
On 10/4/06, G 0kita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I notice mount_null was dropped as of OpenBSD 3.8, can someone tell
me first of all why this was done [...]
Various comments to the likes of 'turd polishing' can be found in the
misc@ archives. IIRC, the developers gave up on this piece of
function
On 10/3/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] note that at least OpenBSD can authenticate
directly against LDAP, using sysutils/login_ldap.
Personally, I suspect the OP has a specific interest in implementing
NIS. Through NIS, OpenBSD can obtain the information it would
otherwis
On 9/30/06, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"The PayPal service may not be used solely for the purpose of transferring
money from one individual to another without an underlying transaction for the
sale of goods or services."
It's a payment model to allow a twice-yearly (update of) rel
On 9/15/06, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] mostly I'm looking for a cluestick about bioctl.
AFAIK, this has to do with bugs in the 3.9 bioctl that were fixed in
-current a while ago. The following two threads came up in the
archives:
LSI MegaRaid non-hotspare
http://marc.thea
Dear list,
As a side effect of using login_ldap from ports, I encounter trouble
using skeyinit and lock for regular users. This appears to be caused
by the permission I put in place on /etc/login.conf (0600) to shield
off login_ldap's bindpw attribute.
Unsurprisingly, lifting these restrictions
On 8/29/06, Steffen Wendzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I currently own 3 home directories. one on each of my workstations and one
on my laptop but I want to have the same data in all 3 folders.
Trying out Unison (available for wintel, BSD and Linux) is still on my
to-do list. I've seen it menti
On 8/23/06, Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/23/06, Nico Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Set up another, non-production, box with 3.9 and build -stable on that.
Seems a slightly cumbersome way to deal with security issues which may
be urgent, but perhaps that's just me?
Buil
On 8/10/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keep a few sanity checks (e.g. no more than X recipients for a message
> or no more than 100 messages a minute)
This also helps against compromised boxes - i.e., it limits the damage.
So it's generally a good idea to have some limit.
On 8/10/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that at least Postfix has an independent greylisting implementation
True and these implementations may even be quite nice. I never felt
much of a need to try it out after having setup spamd.
Both are likely to work with STARTTLS; s
On 8/10/06, Will H. Backman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because I require TLS and SMTP-AUTH for relaying purposes, I'm in a
bind. My real problem is getting Exchange to do SMTP-TLS on a different
port, so this is really a non-openbsd issue.
Perhaps you'd benefit from a solution of shielding your
On 8/10/06, Will H. Backman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that spamd and TLS on port 25 don't get along?
Given a mail server (or MUA) that is configured to require TLS on a
port it connects to, it will likely have a problem with any other end
not offering TLS capability. T
From the behaviour you describe, your design takes an effort at
tearing down just about the nicest part of SMTP: its resilience
against network outages.
On 8/9/06, openbsd misc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the smtp proxy should not be allowed to queue a message, else the
size of the ramdisk woul
On 8/8/06, Tito Mari Francis Escaqo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to replace root with another username as superuser?
Sure, just change its password entry. That said, I wouldn't recommend
wasting your time on this.
This could make the system very secure because when it comes to
B
On 8/5/06, Felix Kronlage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think, silent by default with -v for more informations seems more
appropiate too.
Would you care to elaborate why you want the default behaviour (notify
on a changed timeout) altered?
The proposed patch by the OP doesn't cause changes for
On 7/31/06, R. Tyler Ballance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeeez, talk about an overreaction to the suggestion. [...] It's not that far
fetched of an idea
Given the times that this question popped up in the archives, Mickey's
reaction isn't too surprising. From the past discussions, I gather
that
On 7/29/06, J Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess that squelches plans for a SATA HDD as well :(
If by that you mean you expect OpenBSD to not support SATA HDDs, I can
happily assure you you're wrong. OpenBSD supports various SATA
controllers (such as your SiI 3112, the SiI 3114, etc.). I
On 7/24/06, Xavier Mertens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's still running 3.5 (ok, ok, don't shoot, it's an old one but upgrades are
not easy).
As another poster already mentioned: upgrades are an easy and well
documented process. Do your specific circumstances (e.g. problems to
physically acce
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
